Recognition of the best interests and the right to family life of children separated from an imprisoned parent in Europe has evolved significantly since the 1989 UNCRC. Yet the evolution of policy initiatives to protect the best interests...
moreRecognition of the best interests and the right to family life of children separated from an imprisoned parent in Europe has evolved significantly since the 1989 UNCRC. Yet the evolution of policy initiatives to protect the best interests and safeguard the right to family life of this group of children based on the principles inherent in this convention and others has failed to keep pace. Why is the transposition of their rights to family life and well-being
lagging or absent with respect to policymaking on national and European Union levels? The crucial role of issue framing in policymaking has been well documented; the way issues are
framed has impact. In this theoretical discussion, based on a literature review, the author proposes a constructivist analytical framework combining theories of issue framing,
agenda-setting and lobbying to address the dynamics of policy processes and discursive interactions among policy entrepreneurs, political actors and publics for children affected
by parental incarceration, and to advance some hypotheses concerning those factors which
could be impeding policy interactions for affected children at national and EU levels. This
framework, to be developed over the next five years as part of research that the author is
undertaking at Maastricht University, will enhance understanding of the ways in which
framing dynamics play a role in the more intricate, fragmented policymaking environment
of EU institutions, and might shed light on the ways in which policies on behalf of this
group of children could be further promoted in future.
