The Impact of Bikesharing
White Paper on the Social, Environmental,
and Economic Effects of Bikesharing
Courtney Gardner & Tucker Gaegauf
A2B Bikeshare
July 17, 2014
contact@a2bbikeshare.com
Abstract:
This white paper analyzes different aspects of bikesharing to understand
both the direct and indirect benefits of bikesharing systems in US
communities. This report will highlight the various social, environmental,
and economic effects of bikeshare systems. The social impact of
bikesharing demonstrates increased connectivity of a community, positive
health and exercise benefits, increased livability, and a way to increase
transportation accessibility for low income users. The environmental effect
of bikesharing demonstrates that bicycling is the most efficient mode of
transit and that bikesharing reduces our dependency on cars and fossil
fuels. The economic impact demonstrates that bikesharing generates
individual gas and parking savings while stimulating local retail and
commerce in a community. Bikesharing overall provides far-reaching
benefits for a community and shows itself to be well worth the initial costs.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction to the Impact of Bikesharing..........................................................1
2. The Social Impact of Bikesharing......................................................................2
3. The Environmental Impact of Bikesharing.........................................................7
4. The Economic Impact of Bikesharing................................................................9
5. Concluding Remarks.......................................................................................13
A2B Bikeshare, 1
1. Introduction to the Impact of Bikesharing
Traffic congestion, dependency on the car,
and public transit connectivity (i.e. the “last
mile” problem) are problems that many
communities are currently facing. Universities
and expansive corporate campuses also face
transportation challenges which are not
easily solved through busing or cars. In the
search for solutions to these issues, those
interested in a sustainable transportation
solution are increasingly turning to bikesharing and improved bicycle infrastructure
as solutions to these growing issues in
communities, universities, and corporate
campuses alike. Data and study analysis on
the benefits of bikesharing has been largely
limited, though the current data available
builds a strong case that bikesharing has a
significant and positive social, environmental,
and economic impact on communities,
universities, and corporate campuses that
implement a bikeshare.
Bikeshare system have experienced great
popularity when implemented. New York
City’s CitiBike system has passed the
10,000,000 ride benchmark according to
official CitiBike data, Capital Bikeshare has
sold over 450,000 24 hour memberships alltime according to official program data, and
even the new bikeshare in Indianapolis has
exceeded ridership expectations according to
the Indianapolis communications director
Marc Lotter.1 This kind of bicycle usage
means that bikesharing does get people on
bikes and as a result increases bicycle
ridership. Some of the data used in this white
paper come from the effects of general
bicycling, not bikeshare itself, but because
bikesharing increases bicycle ridership, much
1
of the data available on the impact of
bicycling is highly relevant and interconnected to the impact of bikesharing.
As the next three sections of this white paper
will elaborate on, research either strongly
suggests or securely demonstrates that
b ik e s h a rin g e x h ib it s p o s it iv e s o c i a l ,
environmental, and economic effects. The
social impact of bikesharing examines the
transit connectivity benefits of bikeshare,
health & exercise benefits from increased
bicycling, increased vibrancy and livability of
an area, and the potential to making more
equitable transit for those who are
disadvantaged. The environmental impact of
bikesharing examines the evidence that
bicycling is the most efficient mode of transit
fuel-wise, reduces carbon emissions
significantly, and reduces dependency on the
car/fossil fuels. The economic impact of
bikesharing examines the evidence that
bicycling and bikesharing saves individuals
money, stimulates local commerce, and that
bicycle infrastructure and bikesharing provide
a positive return on investment. Through a
comprehensive understanding of the different
social, environmental, and economic impacts
of bikesharing, one can better appreciate the
power of bikesharing and its far reaching
effects.
Tuohy, John (July 2014) “Indianapolis bike-share program exceeds expectations” The Indianapolis Star.
A2B Bikeshare, 2
2.
Social Impact of Bikesharing
The major social impacts of bikesharing can
be sorted by the increased connectivity,
social capital, and health benefits that a
system offers. Bikesharing offers increased
transportation options and greater community
connectivity at a macro-level and provides
simpler and quicker commutes for residents,
students, and employees alike.
Increased Connectivity
interact with your community from a bike or
on foot than it is from a car or bus, which
makes bikesharing a natural solution to
increasing the connectivity of a community,
university, or corporate campus. As explained
in the economic effects section, bikesharing
stimulates local commerce in large part due
to the ease of checking out a storefront on
foot or bike than from a car, an effect of
increased connectivity.
Bikesharing has been introduced as a shortterm bike rental network to offer one-way and
public transportation, ideal for dense,
concentrated city centers, large universities
and large corporate campuses. It’s easier to
In a 2011 rider survey done by Capital
Bikeshare (Washington D.C.), 70% of riders
reported they last used bikeshare because
they saw it as the quickest and easiest way
to get to their destination.2 Among large scale
2
LDA Consulting (June, 2012) “Capital Bikeshare 2011 Member Survey Report” p. ii.
A2B Bikeshare, 3
bikeshare systems, it is quite common for
bicycle fleets to be collocated with public
transit, which 4/9 medium to large operators
did in 2011.3 6/9 of the medium to large
operators integrated transit and bikesharing
maps into their systems.4 As bikesharing
technology continues to develop, it will further
connect with different forms of public
transportation. This shows that bikeshare
operators want their systems to be wellconnected and well-integrated within a
community, university, or corporate campus.
For universities, connectivity can be an issue.
Bikesharing offers universities housing,
sustainability, and transportation benefits.
Building a dormitory or additional housing
farther away from campus becomes more
feasible with a bikeshare system. It can give
officials in charge of transportation a new,
cost-effective way to transport students
across campus, especially ideal for 0.5-2 mile
distances. This allows universities to more
effectively expand into territories that may
have been inaccessible for distance reasons.
Health & Exercise Benefits
Bikeshare offers a simple way to incorporate
moderate exercise into a user’s daily routine.
Users involved in many systems self-report
health benefits and increased aerobic
capacity since joining their local bikeshare
system. 57% of Capital Bikeshare members
indicated that they joined the bikeshare
through a desire for increased exercise, as
indicated by Capital Bikeshare’s 2013
Member’s survey.5 According to Denver BCycle’s 2013 annual report, users burned
16,812,729 calories, equivalent to over
30,000 Big Macs. These two facts suggest
that bikesharing either inspires or aids
members to make active lifestyle choices
regularly.
While studies of Capital Bikeshare and
Boulder Bikeshare show that the average
bikeshare rider consistently rides between
0.5 and 2 miles each time, research shows
that there is a significant relationship
between the modes of transit used in
commuting to work and amount of time a
person engages in recreational physical
activity outside of their commute.6 Frequency
and average length of trips suggests that
Capital Bikeshare members use bikeshare to
help them reach their recommended level of
physical activity.
According to the On Bike Share website, the
employee health and productivity benefits
make bikesharing something to consider.
Here were the employee benefits cited by On
Bike Share: 7
• Healthy employees take 9 times fewer sick
days than workers with poor health.
• The healthiest employees were nearly 3
times more productive than those with
poorer health.
• Fit workers made 60% fewer errors on jobs
involving concentration and short-term
memory.
3
Shaheen et. al (July 2012) “Public Bikesharing in North America: Early Operator and User Understanding” p. 35.
4
Ibid, p. 36.
5
LDA Consulting (May 2013) “Capital Bikeshare 2013 Member Survey Report” p. iii.
6
Terzano, K. & Morckel, V.C (2011) "Walk or Bike to a Healthier Life: Commuting Behavior and Recreational Physical
Activity" George Washington University. p. 492-496.
7
On Bike Share (2012) “Bike Share for Corporations”.
A2B Bikeshare, 4
• Vigorous exercise improved mental
alertness and productivity for four to five
hours afterwards.
These benefits can be hard to quantify, but
employers and corporate campuses have
great incentive in investing in bikeshare
systems. With improvements in technology,
it’s becoming very cost efficient for
corporations to host a robust bikeshare
system. For more information, check out A2B
Bikeshare’s Technology White Paper.
Highly difficult to measure but perhaps one of
the most important health benefits of
bicycling is the happiness and entertainment
factor. 76% of Capital Bikeshare members
responded that the simple enjoyment of
biking was a motivation for using the
bikeshare system.8 In the same survey, the
most common non-work trips were taken for
social and entertainment purposes.9 The
exercise and simple enjoyment induced from
a bikeshare ride may contribute to increased
happiness along with increased health.
There is great evidence that investing in
bicycling infrastructure and as an extension
bikesharing provides communities great
returns. According to an analysis of the costs
and benefits of the bicycle investment project
in Portland, OR by Gotschi, the promotion of
bicycling has shown great potential to
increase overall physical activity, and by
8
LDA Consulting (May, 2013) 2013 Capital Bikeshare Member Survey Report, p. iii.
9
LDA Consulting (May, 2013) 2013 Capital Bikeshare Member Survey Report, p. v.
A2B Bikeshare, 5
analyzing health care cost savings, has
demonstrated that by 2040, Portland, OR is
projected to save between $388 to $594
million with its bicycling investments.10 Just
the immediate healthcare costs alone can
justify the investment in bicycling. It should
come as little surprise, then, that healthcare
companies are one of the most common
bikeshare sponsors. Bikesharing is an
ingenious way to combine the need for more
effective commuter options while promoting
physical activity and exercise.
Bikesharing Makes Areas More Vibrant
and Livable
Bikesharing can change the very dynamic of
a living or working space. Cities that rate
highly in livability are often also highly cyclefriendly. Internationally, cities that rate highly
in livability (e.g. Vienna, Copenhagen, Zurich,
and Munich) often had robust bicycle
infrastructure and bikeshare systems. The
four examples provided above rate in the top
10 of many livability measurement studies
and invest heavily in bicycling, be it a
bikeshare system to further augment bicycle
ridership or investing heavily in bicycle
infrastructure. Not only does bikesharing
make a community more livable, but it can
also make a university or corporate campus
more livable and workable, as demonstrated
by the positive health and connectivity effects
of bikesharing at these institutions.
Bikesharing can also offers tourists an
alternative way to navigate a city, which can
both reduce congestion caused by tourism
and give tourists a novel, potentially more
enjoyable mode of sightseeing transportation.
According to Capital Bikeshare data from
January, 2012, the 6th most common oneway trip was tourists sightseeing Washington
D.C. from the Smithsonian station back to the
Smithsonian station, with 3,586 of such trips
lasting an average of 2 hours, 48 minutes,
meaning tourists take advantage of
bikesharing and experience a community in a
new way.11 Bikesharing allows individuals to
experience a community, university, or
corporate campus in a more connected and
intimate way, which consequently makes
them more vibrant and livable.
Offers More Equitable Transportation to
Lower Income Areas
One of the biggest issues to date with
bikesharing is that low-income neighborhoods are generally situated in the outskirts
of city centers or away from downtown areas
and have less access and opportunity to take
advantage of bikesharing. In these areas,
residents tend to lack cars and access to
affordable and efficient transit options.
Bikesharing has yet to reach those who could
use it most. Operators counteract this
problem in conjunction with community
wishes to subsidize memberships for low
income earners, thus providing an inclusive
pricing structure. Some non-profits, like
Hubway Bikeshare (Boston, MA) that run
bikeshare systems have started to research
and implement pilot programs of subsidized
10
Gotschi, Thomas (2011) “Costs and Benefits of Bicycling Investments in Portland, Oregon” Journal of Physical
Activity and Health, Human Kinetics Inc.
11
Alpert, David (January 2012): “Capital Bikeshare data already yields interesting facts” Greater Greater Washington.
Retrieved 27 May 2014.
A2B Bikeshare, 6
memberships while implementing stations in
low-revenue areas to increase access and
equity of ridership. Hubway bikeshare offers
a membership for $5 annually for interested
people on public assistance.12 Capital
Bikeshare has partnered with local non-profit,
Job Access Reverse Commute, to offer a
limited number of free memberships, free
bicycle safety information, and a free helmet.
Awards are based on income level thresholds
and are intended to increase the diversity of
ridership.13 As bikesharing technology
develops through more flexible station sizes
and placement, greater accessibility will be
achieved.
12
Boston Bikes Subsidized Hubway Memberships Page, http://www.bostonbikes.org/programs/subsidized-hubwaymemberships/ Retrieved 17 July 2014.
13
Capital Bikesharing Pricing Website, https://www.capitalbikeshare.com/pricing
A2B Bikeshare, 7
3.
Environmental Impact of Bikesharing
B i k e s h a r i n g o ff e r s a t r a n s portation solution that emits an
absolute minimal amount of CO2
into the atmosphere, reduces our
dependency on fossil fuels, and
offers people a practical alternative
mode of transit. As part of the
alternative energy initiative,
bikesharing is quickly becoming a
desirable option to improve upon
solving our current pollution and
car dependency problems.
Minimal Carbon Emission
The bicycle is currently the most
energy-efficient vehicle commonly
used, measured to be even more efficient
than walking, 14 which makes bikesharing a
effective solution in cutting down carbon
emissions and other harmful pollutants.
Increased use of bikeshare solves first- and
last-mile problems that plagues public transit
coverage and replaces short one-way fuelbased trips. Above is a chart that shows how
many pounds of CO2 each mode of
transportation emits per passenger-mile.
Bikesharing has shown an immediate impact
in avoiding fuel usage and carbon emissions.
In 2013, Denver B-Cycle users spared the
atmosphere 1,028,836 pounds of CO2
emissions and rode about 560,424 miles.15 A
member survey demonstrated that 43% of BCycle rides replaced car trips, resulting in a
15,868 gallon decrease in gasoline
consumption, avoiding 312,121 pounds of
carbon emissions and saving about $55,000
in gas.16
Investing in bicycling returns large savings for
a community. According to an analysis of the
costs and benefits of the bicycle investment
project in Portland, OR by Gotschi, the
promotion of bicycling has shown great
potential for savings on fuel costs. By 2040,
Portland, OR is projected to save between
$143 to $218 million with its bicycling
investments, showing that bicycling (and by
extension bikeshare) can have a tremendous
impact on the environment. The reduction of
carbon emissions significantly impacts air
quality and is a prudent solution to modern
pollution and global climate change
problems.
14
Ghanta, Praveen (May 2010) “Fuel Efficiency: Modes of Transportation Ranked by MPG” True Cost Blog.
15
Denver B-Cycle (2013) “Denver Bike Sharing 2013 Annual Report”
16
Denver B-Cycle (2013) “Denver Bike Sharing 2013 Annual Report”
A2B Bikeshare, 8
Reduces Car and Fossil Fuel Dependency
Bikesharing reduces rush hour traffic, the
need for parking downtown, and congestion
caused by an overabundance of motorists at
peak hours. Residents in a community with a
bikeshare system find bikesharing to be an
effective alternative commuting option, an
ideal supplement to the car. As the graph on
the next page shows, over half of Nice Ride
member respondents drove less often
because of bikesharing, a pattern that can
reduce our dependency on the car, reduce
congestion, and make commutes within
dense urban areas easier.
This shows that carbon emission offset
estimates from bikeshare systems are likely
accurate if trips are not “induced” by the
presence of bikeshare, but are taken as
alternatives based on an existing array of
transportation options. 40% of trips in urban
areas are 2 miles or less, but 90% of those
trips are taken by car.17 Replacing those rides
with a bike would greatly reduce congestion
and pollution caused by standstill traffic.
Users in all cities with bikesharing indicated a
reduction in driving as a result of bikesharing.
The data shows that bikesharing does reduce
the need to drive, and that people will use the
bikes instead of their cars. The Twin Cities
survey reported 53% of individuals
decreasing their driving as a result of
bikesharing.18 The 10,000+ respondents that
answered bikeshare surveys from the twin
cities, Washington D.C., Montreal, and
Toronto reported 40% of individuals (about
4,000 people) driving less often, showing this
effect takes place in many urban settings.
Bikesharing can free up space on the roads
for motorists that actually need to drive to
their destinations. This carbon emission
offset contributes to greener and healthier
communities by reducing the amount of
particles in the atmosphere that cause global
climate change and contributes to the
alternative energy revolution by decreasing
dependency on fossil fuel energy sources.
The reduction in fossil fuel dependency also
applies to universities and corporate
campuses. Bikesharing can reduce a small
amount of rides at universities that may have
been taken by bus or car, and a bikeshare at
a corporate headquarters can allow
employees to travel around campus or out on
the town easier.
Public endorsement and implementation of
bikesharing changes car culture and the
mentality that streets are made for cars only.
As biking becomes more visible through the
presence of a bikesharing system, motorists
become more aware of bikers, whether on
bikeshare bikes or not. Therefore, cities with
bikesharing systems become friendlier for all
cyclists.19 The visibility of bikesharing acts as
advocacy for urban cyclists in the community.
With this in mind, we recommend implementing bikeshare systems with highly visible
stations and well-branded bikeshare bikes to
increase awareness around the presence of
cycling and importance of motorists’ awareness of cyclists.
17
Sierra Club “Pedaling to Prosperity” p. 1.
18
Ibid, p. 85.
19
Blumenauer, Earl (May, 2013) “Why New York City will love bike share” New York Daily News.
A2B Bikeshare, 9
4.
Economic Impact of Bikesharing
Bikesharing offers economic benefits on both
macro and personal levels. On an intuitive
level, it makes sense that bicycles have a
positive economic effect. It’s easier to check
out storefronts on a bicycle than from a car.
Driving a bicycle uses far less power than a
car, thus remains a far more affordable option
for individuals than a car could ever be. In
addition to the commerce and personal
savings generated, bicycling and bikeshare
also provide communities, universities, and
corporate campuses with a return on
investment. It’s easy to imagine, then, that
studies have confirmed these intuitions about
bicycling’s positive economic effects on a
community-level.
Personal Savings from Less Driving
Bikesharing offers individuals a price efficient
alternative to the car in denser areas.
According to the AAA (American Automobile
Association), the average American spends
an average of $9,122/year operating a car in
a g i v e n y e a r a t a b o u t $ 0 . 6 0 / m i l e .20
Bikesharing annual memberships come at a
much lower price, costing usually less than
$100 for an individual. Of all 2011 Boulder BCycle members, nearly 40% saved money on
gasoline and more than 20% reported they
saved money on parking.21 On average,
Capital Bikeshare members that own a car
have saved $800 per year on personal travel
costs. Additionally, 60% of riders said they
have used a taxi less often since joining
bikeshare.22 Bikesharing makes it easier to
be less dependent on car and taxi
transportation options.
The cost efficiency of bikeshare compared to distance that
can be travelled (Cincinnati Bikeshare Feasibility Study).
20
American Automobile Association (2013) “Cost of Owning and Operating Vehicle in U.S. Increases Nearly Two
Percent According to AAA’s 2013 ‘Your Driving Costs’ Study”
21
Boulder B-Cycle (2011) Boulder B-Cycle 2011 Annual Report, p. 8.
22
LDA Consulting (May, 2013) 2013 Capital Bikeshare Member Survey Report, p. ii.
A2B Bikeshare, 10
Bikesharing also offers individuals more
public transportation options for short and
medium distance commutes. Sometimes the
increased connectivity and transportation
options offered by a bikeshare are so great
that people sell their cars. Of the 5% of
Capital Bikeshare members who sold their
vehicle since becoming a member, 81% of
them indicated the bikeshare as a factor in
their decision.23 Even if such an extreme
effect is not seen in all communities, by
eliminating these small trips, bikeshare riders
can decrease their transportation costs and
dependence on expensive fossil fuel-based
transit options.
Bikesharing Stimulates Local Commerce
Bikesharing has shown to contribute to the
economic vibrancy of city centers and
downtown commercial districts. Riders create
more foot traffic and are more likely to get off
their bikes and enter local businesses in
concentrated commercial areas than
motorists because of issues with space and
parking. 85% of Capital Bikeshare users
stated that they were more likely to patronize
a store that was near or next to a bikeshare
station.24 This highlights an opportunity for
communities to get local businesses involved
in corporate sponsorships and becoming
station hosts. Bikesharing represents an
investment in downtown districts that can be
used to create local partnerships and gain
initial community support to start a
bikesharing program.
23
LDA Consulting (May, 2013) 2013 Capital Bikeshare Member Survey Report, p. ii.
24
LDA Consulting (May, 2013) 2013 Capital Bikeshare Member Survey Report, p. 45.
A2B Bikeshare, 11
Increased bicycling and better bicycle
infrastructure has been shown to increase
the local retail and commercial demand in
New York City. When New York City created
protected bike lanes on 8th and 9th Avenue,
there was a 49% increase in retail sales,
compared to a 3% increase borough wide.25
The easier it is for consumers to step into a
store, the more often they will do it, which
makes bikesharing an easy way to increase
community retail activity and bring vibrancy to
commercial centers.
25
Another study that reaffirms the effects of
bicycling stimulating local commerce was an
analysis on the the Bloor-Danforth corridor in
Toronto, a commercial zone that has ideal
attributes for a bikeshare lane. The main
findings were that only 10% of patrons drive
to the Bloor Annex neighborhood to shop,
and that patrons arriving by foot and bicycle
visit the most often and spend the most
money per month.26 Reallocating on-street
parking space into a bike lane or using it for a
bikeshare station significantly increase
commercial activity, reduce traffic accidents,
and increases bicycle ridership.27
New York City DOT (2012): “Measuring the Street: New Metrics for the 21st Century Streets”
26
The Clean Air Partnership (February 2009) “Bike Lanes, On-Street Parking and Business A Study of Bloor Street in
Toronto’s Annex Neighbourhood”.
27
The Clean Air Partnership (February 2009) “Bike Lanes, On-Street Parking and Business A Study of Bloor Street in
Toronto’s Annex Neighbourhood”.
A2B Bikeshare, 12
Bicycling and Bikeshare Provides a
Return on Investment
Bikesharing is currently the lowest cost-permile public transport option, making it the
best option for public transportation in
c o n c e n t r a t e d c o m m u n i t y s e t t i n g s .28
According to the Sierra Club, bicycling saved
Americans about $4.6 billion in 2012.29 For
$60 million – the cost of a single mile of
urban highway – Portland, OR was able to
implement a city-wide bicycle network.30
Portland’s investment in bicycling has a
positive return on investment, even by the
most conservative of measures, as analyzed
by Gotschi’s bicycling investment report.31
Portland’s investment has also been
recognized by the League of American
Bicyclists, earning the highest possible
platinum rating, an exclusive rating that only
three other communities can claim.
28
With developments in bikesharing
technology, bikesharing is becoming
financially profitable. Fourth generation
bikeshare is breaking the kiosk barrier, which
has been the main factor in costs remaining
high. A2B Bikeshare’s Technology White
Paper in detail how the technology from
different vendors is reducing the capital and
operational costs that have plagued
bikesharing in the past.
Kisner, Corinne (2011) “Integrating Bike Share Programs into a Sustainable Transportation Option” NLC p. 2.
29
American Automobile Association (2013) “Cost of Owning and Operating Vehicle in U.S. Increases Nearly Two
Percent According to AAA’s 2013 ‘Your Driving Costs’ Study”
30
31
Sierra Club “Pedaling to Prosperity” p. 1.
Gotschi, Thomas (2011) “Costs and Benefits of Bicycling Investments in Portland, Oregon” Journal of Physical
Activity and Health, Human Kinetics Inc.
A2B Bikeshare, 13
5.
Concluding Remarks
It is clear from independent studies and
bikeshare annual report data that bikesharing
provides numerous benefits at the
community, university, corporate and
individual level. Bikesharing fits well into a
healthy and connected lifestyle. In
conjunction with other community initiatives,
bikesharing increases quality of life and is
part of an active lifestyle. Bikesharing helps
people decrease the dependence on fossil
fuels by offering convenient and quick
transportation infrastructure alternatives.
Additionally, communities can see decreased
CO2 emissions and the issues that are
caused by these emissions. Increased
environmental quality of city and suburban
communities are part of an alternative energy
revolution. Finally, bikesharing increases foot
traffic and thus the economic vibrancy of
downtown commercial districts while saving
individuals money.
Using the evidence presented in this white
paper, it is our recommendation that
communities, universities, and corporate
campuses look into implementing a
bikeshare system for their community to
counter problems with traffic congestion,
dependency on the car, and public transit
connectivity while impacting the community in
positive social, environmental, and economic
ways.
A2B Bikeshare, 14
Bibliography
• A2B Bikeshare Official Website: https://www.a2bbikeshare.com/ Retrieved 16 July 2014.
• Alpert, David (January 2012): “Capital Bikeshare data already yields interesting facts” Greater
Greater Washington. Retrieved 27 May 2014.
• Alta Planning + Design (September 2012): "Cincinnati Bike Share Feasibility Study"
• Blumenauer, Earl (May, 2013) “Why New York City will love bike share” New York Daily News.
• Boston Bikes Subsidized Hubway Memberships Page, http://www.bostonbikes.org/programs/
subsidized-hubway-memberships/ Retrieved 17 July 2014.
• Buck, Darren / Buehler, Ralph (November 2011): “Bike Lanes and Other Determinants of
Capital Bikeshare Trips”.
• Capital Bikeshare Dashboard Main Metrics, http://cabidashboard.ddot.dc.gov/
CaBiDashboard/, Retrieved 27 May 2014.
• Gaegauf, Tucker (July 2014) “Bikeshare Funding White Paper: A Guide to the Different
Bikeshare Business Models and Funding Process” A2B Bikeshare Website.
• Gaegauf, Tucker (July 2014) “Bikeshare Implementation White Paper - A How-to Guide to
Planning and Installing a Bikeshare System” A2B Bikeshare Website.
• Gaegauf, Tucker (June 2014) “Bikeshare Technology White Paper – A Comparative Guide to
the Different Technologies Offered by Bikesharing Vendors” A2B Bikeshare Website.
• Ghanta, Praveen (May 2010) “Fuel Efficiency: Modes of Transportation Ranked by MPG” True
Cost Blog.
• Gotschi, Thomas (2011) “Costs and Benefits of Bicycling Investments in Portland, Oregon”
Journal of Physical Activity and Health, Human Kinetics Inc.
• Kisner, Corinne (2011) “Integrating Bike Share Programs into a Sustainable Transportation
Option” NLC.
• LDA Consulting (June, 2012) “Capital Bikeshare 2011 Member Survey Report”
• LDA Consulting (May 2013) “Capital Bikeshare 2013 Member Survey Report” p. iii.
A2B Bikeshare, 15
• On Bike Share (2012) “Bike Share for Corporations”
• Shaheen, Susan / Martin, Elliot / Cohen, Adam / Finson, Rachel (July, 2012) “Public
Bikesharing in North America: Early Operator and User Understanding” Mineta Transportation
Institute, San José State University.
• Sierra Club “Pedaling to Prosperity” p. 1.
• Terzano, K. & Morckel, V.C (2011) "Walk or Bike to a Healthier Life: Commuting Behavior and
Recreational Physical Activity" George Washington University. p. 492-496.
• The Clean Air Partnership (February 2009) “Bike Lanes, On-Street Parking and Business A
Study of Bloor Street in Toronto’s Annex Neighbourhood”
• Tuohy, John (July 2014) “Indianapolis bike-share program exceeds expectations” The
Indianapolis Star.