John Perkins: Economic Hit Man Summary of Confessions of an Economic Hit Man About John Perkins: Author of Confessions of an Economic Hit Man
John Perkins: Economic Hit Man Summary of Confessions of an Economic Hit Man About John Perkins: Author of Confessions of an Economic Hit Man
John Perkins: Economic Hit Man Summary of Confessions of an Economic Hit Man About John Perkins: Author of Confessions of an Economic Hit Man
John Perkins: Economic Hit Man
Summary of Confessions of an Economic Hit Man
About John Perkins: Author of Confessions of an Economic Hit Man
About John Perkins
JOHN PERKINS was recruited by the National Security Agency during his last year at Boston University's School of
Business Administration, 1968. He spent the next three years in the Peace Corps in South America and then in 1971
joined the international consulting firm of Chas. T. Main, a Boston-based company of 2000 employees that kept a
very low profile. As Chief Economist and Director of Economics and Regional Planning at MAIN, his primary job was
to convince Less Developed Countries (LDCs) around the world to accept multibillion dollar loans for infrastructure
projects and to see to it that most of this money ended up at MAIN, Bechtel, Halliburton, Brown and Root, and other
U.S. engineering/construction companies. The loans left the recipient countries wallowing in debt and highly
vulnerable to outside political and commercial interests.
Perkins resigned his position at MAIN in 1981. He founded and became CEO of Independent Power Systems,
pioneering technologies that promoted the use of "waste" power plant heat in hydroponic greenhouses and other
cogeneration applications. In 1990, he sold IPS and founded a nonprofit organization, Dream Change Coalition,
which works closely with Amazonian and other indigenous people to help preserve their environments and cultures.
John began writing Confessions of an Economic Hit Man several times during the past two decades. He was
persuaded to stop by lucrative business offers that were contingent on his silence. "Now," he says, "we have entered
the new millennium. Nine-eleven happened. My daughter has grown up and left home. The time has come. . ."
John Perkins was for many years one of the world's top economists. He worked directly with
the heads of the World Bank, IMF, and other global financial institutions. He quit this work in
the 1980s because morally and ethically, he felt it was wrong to play such a key role in creating
world empire at the expense of the less advantaged around the world.
After being persuaded and even bribed not to write a book about his experiences, Perkins
states, "When 9/11 struck, I had a change of heart." The book, Confessions of an Economic
Hitman, spent many weeks on amazon.com's bestseller list and has been widely acclaimed.
Below is a summary of this landmark book and ideas on how you can help to build a brighter
future for us all.
Note: For an excellent, engaging two-minute video summary of Perkins' story, click here.
General Overview
Confessions of an Economic Hit Man is John Perkins' fast-paced autobiography, which reveals
his career as an economist for an international consulting firm. Perkins says he was actually an
"Economic Hit Man." His job was to convince countries that are strategically important to the
United States to accept enormous loans for infrastructure development and to make sure
that the lucrative projects were contracted to U.S. corporations.
Perkins takes the reader through his career and explains how he created economic projections
for countries to accept billions of dollars in loans they surely couldn't afford. He shares his
battle with his conscience over these actions and offers advice for how Americans can work to
end these practices which have directly resulted in terrorist attacks and animosity towards the
United States.
What Is An Economic Hit Man?
Perkins defines economic hit men as "highly paid professionals who cheat countries around
the globe out of trillions of dollars. They funnel money from the World Bank, the U.S. Agency
for International Development (USAID), and other foreign ‘aid' organizations into the coffers
of huge corporations and the pockets of a few wealthy families who control the planet's
natural resources.
Their tools include fraudulent financial reports, rigged elections, payoffs, extortion, sex, and
murder. They play a game as old as empire, but one that has taken on new and terrifying
dimensions during this time of globalization."
In Perkins' case, he was hired as an economist for the international consulting firm of Chas. T.
Main, Inc. (MAIN). He was told in confidential meetings with "special consultant" to the
company Claudine Martin that he had two primary objectives:
1. He was supposed to justify huge loans for countries. These loans would be for major
engineering and construction projects, which were to be carried out by MAIN and other U.S.
companies such as Bechtel, Halliburton, Stone & Webster and Brown & Root.
2. He was supposed to help bankrupt the countries that received these loans after the U.S.
companies involved had been paid. This would make sure that these countries would remain in
debt to their creditors and would then be easy targets when the U.S. needed favors such as
military bases, UN votes and access to natural resources like oil.
Perkins' job was to produce economic growth projections that would make the case for a
variety of major projects. If the U.S. decided to lend a country money, Perkins would compare
the economic benefits of different projects such as power plants or telecommunications
systems. He would then produce reports that showed the economic growth the country would
experience due to these projects. These economic growth projections needed to be high
enough to justify the loans. Otherwise, the loans would be denied.
The gross national product (GNP) was always the most important factor in these economic
projections. The project expected to increase the GNP the most would be chosen. In the cases
where there was only one project under consideration, it needed to be shown that the project
would greatly benefit the GNP. Luckily for the economic hit man, GNP figures can be quite
deceptive. "For instance, the growth of GNP may result even when it profits only one person,
such as an individual who owns a utility company, while the majority of the population is
burdened with debt."
All of these projects were meant to make huge profits for the contractors. The U.S. engineering
and construction companies involved would be assured of great wealth. At the same time, a
few wealthy families and influential leaders in the receiving countries would become very
happy and very rich thanks to these loans. The leaders of these countries would also have
bolstered political power because they were credited with bringing industrial parks, power
plants and airports to their people.
The problem is that these countries simply cannot handle the debt of these loans and their
poorest citizens are deprived of health, education and other social services for several
decades as these countries struggle economically to overcome their huge debts. Meanwhile,
the huge American media conglomerates portray these projects as favors being provided by the
United States. American citizens in general have no trouble believing these messages, and in
fact are led to perceive that these actions are unselfish acts of international goodwill.
Ultimately, due to the large debts, the U.S. is able to draw on these countries for political,
economic and military favors whenever desired. And of course, the U.S. corporations involved
with the expensive projects become extremely wealthy.
The U.S. Government's Role
Economic hit men [EHM] don't actually work for a United States government organization such
as the Central Intelligence Agency. The risk with such a direct association is obvious. For
example, if an EHM was working to put a country in debt to the U.S. with the main reason being
for favorable military and political positions against the Soviet Union, the Soviet Union would
be quite likely to take military action against the U.S. if that EHM were found to be working for
the U.S. government. In the 1960s, America found a way to use economic hitmen without
directly implicating Washington.
It was during the 1960s that we saw the empowerment of international corporations and
multinational organizations such as the World Bank. This allowed for governments,
corporations and multinational organizations to form mutually beneficial relationships. United
States intelligence agencies were able to use these relationships to their advantage.
Government organizations such as the National Security Agency (NSA) were now able to screen
for potential economic hitmen (as they did with Perkins) and then have them hired by
international corporations such as MAIN.
"These economic hitmen would never be paid by the government; instead, they would draw
their salaries from the private sector. As a result, their dirty work, if exposed, would be
chalked up to corporate greed rather than to government policy. In addition, the corporations
that hired them, although paid by government agencies and their multinational banking
counterparts (with taxpayer money), would be insulated from congressional oversight and
public scrutiny, shielded by a growing body of legal initiatives, including trademark,
international trade, and Freedom of Information laws."
Perkins' Story of Being Recruited as an Economic Hit Man
Perkins married a former college classmate in 1967. A good friend of her father's, referred to as
"Uncle Frank", was a top-echelon executive at the NSA. Uncle Frank immediately took a liking to
Perkins and informed him that a job with the NSA would make him eligible for draft deferment,
meaning he could avoid fighting in the Vietnam War.
After extensive interviews with the NSA, Perkins was offered a job, but declined it to instead
join the Peace Corps. Surprisingly, Uncle Frank supported this decision, largely because it meant
that Perkins would have the opportunity to go to Ecuador and live with the indigenous people
of the Amazon region.
It was with the Peace Corps in Ecuador when a vice president of Chas. T. Main, Inc. approached
Perkins about working for MAIN. The man explained that he sometimes acted as an NSA liaison,
which made this job opportunity a perfect fit for Perkins, who had intended on accepting the
NSA job when his Peace Corps tour was over.
Upon returning to the U.S., Perkins was hired as an economist for MAIN. He was told that
MAIN's primary business was engineering, but that their biggest client, the World Bank, had
insisted that the company keep economists employed in order to produce the "critical
economic forecasts used to determine the feasibility and magnitude of engineering projects."
Shortly after being hired, Perkins was trained confidentially by Claudine Martin, a special
consultant to MAIN. It was Martin who explained to Perkins what his real job was. It was Martin
who explained that he was now an "Economic Hit Man" and that once he accepted this job, he
could never leave it.
Indonesia
Perkins' first assignment took him took to Indonesia. Indonesia was an oil-rich country and had
been described as "the most heavily populated piece of real estate on the planet." Perkins' job
was to produce very optimistic economic forecasts for the country, showing that by building
new power plants and distribution lines, the country's economy would explode. These
projections would allow USAID and international banks to justify huge loans for the country,
which would then be paid to U.S. corporations to build the projects.
In 1971, Indonesia had become even more important to the U.S. in its battle against
Communism. Potential withdrawl from Vietnam had the U.S. worried about a domino effect of
one country after another falling under Communist rule. Indonesia was viewed as the key. If
the U.S. could gain control of Indonesia (with the debts that would incur thanks to the loans
for these huge projects), they believed it would help ensure American dominance in
Southeast Asia.
While spending three months in Indonesia to conduct interviews and study the economic
potential for the country, Perkins was exposed to the drastic discrepancy between the wealthy
and the extremely poor in Indonesia. While there were certainly signs of a striving economy
with first-class hotels and mansions, Perkins also personally saw the tragic side of Indonesia
where women and children bathed in wretched, sewer-filled water and beggars packed the
streets. He also met some of the country's native citizens and learned of their resentment of
American greed and extravagance in the face of their starving children.
These close encounters with the Indonesians created a struggle of conscience for Perkins. He
wondered if American capitalism was really the answer for the people of Indonesia. He
wondered if the population as a whole would really benefit from the infrastructures the U.S.
wanted to build in Indonesia, or would it only be a wealthy few who became even wealthier
while the rest of the country became more entrenched in poverty and became even more anti-
American?
While conducting his studies in Indonesia, Perkins was encouraged by his superiors to create
strong forecasts for economic growth. He was told that growth rates of 17 percent per annum
were expected. Also providing economic forecasts for MAIN was an older employee named
Howard Parker. Parker told Perkins not to be pressured by his superiors, he told him not to buy
into the game, not to create unrealistic projections. He told Perkins that the electrification
project could not create economic growth rates of more than 7-9 percent.
Conversations with Parker led to more conscience battles for Perkins. Ultimately, he told
himself that the decision wasn't really his to make, it would be up to his bosses and they could
simply choose between his high economic forecast and Parker's lower forecast. When the final
projections were presented to the executives at MAIN, Perkins' figures pleased his bosses
with 17-20 percent growth rate projections while Parker's forecast came in at eight percent.
Parker was promptly fired and Perkins was promoted to Chief Economist at MAIN and
received a nice raise.
Panama
In 1972, Perkins was sent to Panama to close the deal on MAIN's master development plan with
the country. "This plan would create a justification for World Bank, Inter-American
Development Bank, and USAID investment of billions of dollars in the energy, transportation,
and agricultural sectors of this tiny and very crucial country. It was, of course, a subterfuge, a
means of making Panama forever indebted and thereby returning to its puppet status."
Again, Perkins experienced the enormous differences between the wealthy and the poor.
However, in Panama, the differences were most extreme in one area, the Canal Zone. In the
Canal Zone, Americans lived in beautiful homes and enjoyed golf courses and first class
shopping. Just outside of the Canal Zone, Panamanians lived in wooden shacks and among
overflowing sewage. These harsh differences created high levels of animosity between the
Americans living in the Canal Zone and the natives of Panama. It was not uncommon to see
graffiti messages demanding that the U.S. leave Panama.
On his trip, Perkins met with Panama's president and charismatic leader, Omar Torrijos. Perkins
was very impressed with Torrijos and became friends with the leader. Torrijos was well aware
of the EHM practices and knew fully how the game was played. He knew that he could become
a very wealthy man by cooperating with the U.S. companies that wanted to build their projects
in his country, but he worried about Panama losing its independence and not taking care of its
many citizens living in poverty.
Torrijos made a peculiar deal with Perkins and MAIN. He wanted Panama to take back control
of the Panama Canal and in doing so he wanted to build a more efficient canal, a sea-level one
without locks that would allow for bigger ships. The Japanese, the Canal's biggest clients, would
be interested in financing this construction, which would anger Bechtel Group, Inc. Bechtel was
a company closely connected to Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford and George H.W. Bush.
Omar Torrijos was concerned that these actions might send the wrong signals internationally.
He wanted to make sure that Panama was recognized as an independent country and was not
dictated by Russia, China or Cuba. He did not want Panama to be perceived as against the
United States. Instead, he wanted it known that they were simply protecting the rights of the
poor.
Torrijos did want to invest in huge advancement projects in electricity, transportation and
communications for Panama, but he wanted to make certain that these projects benefited his
entire country, including those living in extreme poverty. To do so would require huge amounts
of money from the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank. Torrijos worried
that his commitment to taking back the Canal would anger the top people at Bechtel so much
that it would make it nearly impossible to achieve his plans for these projects.
So, Torrijos made a deal with Perkins and MAIN. He told Perkins that if he could secure the
financing for these projects, MAIN could have all the work they wanted on this master
development plan. Perkins agreed to the deal and would do Torrijos' bidding.
Saudi Arabia
In response to the power of the international oil companies, which collaborated to hold down
petroleum prices, a group of oil-producing countries formed OPEC in the 1960s. The huge
impact OPEC was capable of became evident to the world with the 1973 oil embargo. This
embargo was a result of the United States' support of Israel when Egypt and Syria launched
attacks on the country.
As the U.S. provided Israel with more financial aid, Saudi Arabia and other Arab oil producing
countries imposed a total embargo on oil shipments to the U.S. While the embargo was short-
lived, its impact was huge as Saudi oil prices jumped from $1.39 per barrel on January 1, 1970
to $8.32 on January 1, 1974.
As a result, Wall Street and Washington became obsessed with protecting American oil supplies
and the U.S. was forced to recognize Saudi Arabia's importance to its economy. "For Saudi
Arabia, the additional oil income resulting from the price hikes was a mixed blessing." Suddenly,
the country's conservative religious beliefs were being replaced with a sense of materialism.
Washington recognized this movement and negotiated with Saudi Arabia for assurance that
there would never again be an oil embargo from the country. The result of these negotiations
was the United States-Saudi Arabian Joint Economic Commission, known as JECOR. The
unprecedented agreement was the opposite of the norm, where countries had to borrow
from the U.S. until it could never get out of that debt. Instead, this agreement relied on Saudi
Arabia's own money to hire American firms to build up the country.
The U.S. wanted Saudi Arabia to guarantee to maintain oil supplies at prices that would be
acceptable to the U.S. and its allies. Due to Saudi Arabia's vast petroleum supplies, this
guarantee would protect the U.S. even if other countries threatened oil embargos.
In exchange for the guarantee, the U.S. offered the House of Saud a commitment to provide
complete political and military support (this would guarantee that the royal family would
continue to rule in Saudi Arabia). The condition would be that the Saudis buy U.S. government
securities with their petrodollars and that the interest earned on these securities would be used
to pay U.S. companies to convert Saudi Arabia into a modern industrial power.
Perkins was brought in as an adviser in the early stages of these negotiations. His job was "to
develop forecasts of what might happen in Saudi Arabia if vast amounts of money were
invested in its infrastructure, and to map out scenarios for spending that money." He was told
that not only would this job result in huge profits for MAIN, but that it was also a matter of
national security.
This job was different for Perkins as the final objective was not to burden Saudi Arabia with
debts it could never repay, but instead to "assure that a large portion of petrodollars found
their way back to the United States." Basically, MAIN and other U.S. corporations needed to
convince Saudi Arabia of the importance and benefits of transforming their country to a more
modern nation. This would ultimately make Saudi Arabia more dependent on U.S. corporations
and make U.S. corporations extremely wealthy.
For his part, Perkins convinced a key player within the House of Saud, a man he calls Prince W.,
that these projects would benefit his country as well as him personally. Perkins was able to
eventually persuade Prince W. by arranging for a beautiful prostitute to live with him. By
arranging for the prostitute to live with Prince W., Perkins was able to gain his trust and
eventually convinced him of the value of the deal. The entire package was finally approved by
the royal family of Saudi Arabia and MAIN was rewarded with one of the first highly lucrative
contracts, which was actually administered by the U.S. Department of the Treasury.
"The deal between the United States and Saudi Arabia transformed the kingdom practically
overnight." It also marked the beginning of an ongoing relationship between the House of
Saud, the bin Laden family and the Bush family, which benefited greatly from a financial
standpoint thanks to the deal.
Struggling with His Conscience
Perkins saw his career take off as he was promoted again and became the youngest partner in
the history of MAIN. He would go on to head major projects all over the world while taking
home a huge salary. However, Perkins could not stop struggling with his conscience over the
negative outcomes he believed he was causing as an EHM. In 1978 and 1979, the consequences
of EHM empire building became clear to Perkins by what he saw happen in Iran.
While the U.S. had supported the shah, the results had led to class wars and passionate
animosity towards the "corporatocracy" being implemented in Iran. Perkins had seen this
hostility first-hand in several of the countries where he had helped to create similar situations
with his EHM practices. Citizens of these countries hated U.S. policy and blamed it for their
corrupt leaders and despotic government. In Iran, the situation escalated and led to the shah
fleeing the country for his own safety and Iranians storming the U.S. Embassy and taking 52
hostages.
It was then that Perkins fully realized that "the United States is a nation laboring to deny the
truth about its imperialist role in the world" and he became overwhelmed with guilt over his
role in this global movement. Perkins sank into a depression and quit his job at MAIN in 1980.
The Impact of the Economic Hit man Continues
Perkins would continue to be haunted by the impact of economic hitmen even as he started his
own company (a company that committed to producing environmentally friendly electricity),
did special consulting for MAIN and other corporations, and became involved with nonprofit
organizations and their efforts to work with and help indigenous people in Latin America.
In 1981, Perkins became deeply disturbed by the death of his friend and the leader of Panama,
Omar Torrijos. Perkins believes that his friend Torrijos' death in a plane crash was a CIA
assassination because of his positions on the Panama Canal (Torrijos had achieved his goal of
taking back the Canal) and his unwillingness to cooperate with American corporations.
Torrijos was replaced by Manuel Noriega, who "became a symbol of corruption and
decadence." Eventually, in 1989, the United States attacked Panama. The reigns of power were
returned to the pre-Torrijos oligarchy, which had served as U.S. puppets from the time when
Panama was torn from Columbia until Torrijos took over.
Perkins also watched closely throughout the ‘80s and ‘90s as the U.S. tried to get Iraq and
Saddam Hussein to buy into the EHM scenario as Saudi Arabia had done before. Hussein
refused and when he invaded Kuwait, the U.S. wasted little time and attacked Iraq. The
economic hitmen failed again in their efforts following the invasion of Iraq and in 2003, the U.S.
invaded Iraq once again.
Perkins began to write Confessions of an Economic Hit Man on several occasions, but stopped
due to bribes or threats. But after 9/11, Perkins knew he could no longer wait and felt he had to
expose these practices and the devastating consequences they create.
What to Do Now
Perkins now spends his life trying to educate people about the role of the economic hit man
and how we can end their practices and achieve more global peace and prosperity by
transforming our institutions. He believes "we have convinced ourselves that all economic
growth benefits humankind, and that the greater the growth, the more widespread the
benefits." We must realize that the American capitalism we are trying to push on other
countries may not be what's best for the rest of the world.
We can't just blame this movement on a conspiracy. "The empire depends on the efficacy of big
banks, corporations, and governments – the corporatocracy. This corporatocracy is ourselves –
we make it happen – which, of course, is why most of us find it difficult to stand up and oppose
it. We cannot bring ourselves to bite the hand of the master who feeds us."
Perkins offers several ways to help stop "the corporatocracy and to end this insane and self-
destructive march to global empire."
ï‚· Read between the lines of each and every media report and help others do the same. The
majority of our media outlets – newspapers, magazines, publishing houses, television stations,
radio stations, etc. – are owned by huge international corporations and these corporations
aren't afraid to manipulate the news they deliver. Always seek the truth and encourage others
to do the same.
ï‚· Cut back on oil consumption and shopping. When you are shopping, be very aware of the
products you buy and the companies you're supporting.
ï‚· Downsize your personal possessions, including your home, your car and your office.
ï‚· Protest against unfair free trade agreements.
ï‚· Protest against companies that exploit desperate people in sweatshops.
ï‚· Protest against companies that pillage the environment.
ï‚· Look for ways to educate others about what is going on in the world. This can be done by
writing letters and emails to friends, newspapers, school boards and local organizations.
ï‚· And finally, ask yourself the following questions:
Why have I allowed myself to be sucked into a system that I know is unbalanced?
What will I do to help our children, and all children everywhere, to fulfill the dream of our
Founding Fathers, the dream of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness?
What course will I take to end starvation, and make sure there is never again a day like
September 11th?
How can I help our children understand that people who live gluttonous, unbalanced lives
should be pitied but never, ever emulated, even if those people present themselves, through
the media they control, as cultural icons and try to convince us that penthouses and yachts
bring happiness?
What changes will I commit to making in my attitudes and perceptions?
What forums will I use to teach others and to learn more on my own?
These are the essential questions of our time.
Quotes from Confessions of an Economic Hitman
Prologue
Quito, Ecuador's capital, stretches across a volcanic valley high in the Andes, at an altitude of nine thousand feet.
Residents of this city, which was founded long before Columbus arrived in the Americas, are accustomed to seeing
snow on the surrounding peaks, despite the fact that they live just a few miles south of the equator. The city of Shell,
a frontier outpost and military base hacked out of Ecuador's Amazon jungle to service the oil company whose name it
bears, is nearly eight thousand feet lower than Quito. A steaming city, it is inhabited mostly by soldiers, oil workers,
and the indigenous people from the Shuar and Kichwa tribes who work for them as prostitutes and laborers.
To journey from one city to the other, you must travel a road that is both tortuous and breathtaking. Local people will
tell you that during the trip you experience all four seasons in a single day. Although I have driven this road many
times, I never tire of the spectacular scenery. Sheer cliffs, punctuated by cascading waterfalls and brilliant
bromeliads, rise up one side. On the other side, the earth drops abruptly into a deep abyss where the Pastaza River,
a headwater of the Amazon, snakes its way down the Andes. The Pastaza carries water from the glaciers of
Cotopaxi, one of the world's highest active volcanoes and a deity in the time of the Incas, to the Atlantic Ocean over
three thousand miles away.
In 2003, I departed Quito in a Subaru Outback and headed for Shell on a mission that was like no other I had ever
accepted. I was hoping to end a war I had helped create. As is the case with so many things we EHMs must take
responsibility for, it is a war that is virtually unknown anywhere outside the country where it is fought. I was on my
way to meet with the Shuars, the Kichwas, and their neighbors the Achuars, the Zaparos, and the Shiwiars—tribes
determined to prevent our oil companies from destroying their homes, families, and lands, even if it means they must
die in the process. For them, this is a war about the survival of their children and cultures, while for us it is about
power, money, and natural resources. It is one part of the struggle for world domination and the dream of a few
greedy men, global empire.
That is what we EHMs do best: we build a global empire. We are an elite group of men and women who utilize
international financial organizations to foment conditions that make other nations subservient to the corporatocracy
running our biggest corporations, our government, and our banks. Like our counterparts in the Mafia, EHMs provide
favors. These take the form of loans to develop infrastructure—electric generating plants, highways, ports, airports, or
industrial parks. A condition of such loans is that engineering and construction companies from our own country must
build all these projects. In essence, most of the money never leaves the United States; it is simply transferred from
banking offices in Washington to engineering offices in New York, Houston, or San Francisco.
Despite the fact that the money is returned almost immediately to corporations that are members of the
corporatocracy (the creditor), the recipient country is required to pay it all back, principal plus interest. If an EHM is
completely successful, the loans are so large that the debtor is forced to default on its payments after a few years.
When this happens, then like the Mafia we demand our pound of flesh. This often includes one or more of the
following: control over United Nations votes, the installation of military bases, or access to precious resources such
as oil or the Panama Canal. Of course, the debtor still owes us the money—and another country is added to our
global empire.
Driving from Quito toward Shell on this sunny day in 2003, I thought back thirty-five years to the first time I arrived in
this part of the world. I had read that although Ecuador is only about the size of Nevada, it has more than thirty active
volcanoes, over 15 percent of the world's bird species, and thousands of as-yet-unclassified plants, and that it is a
land of diverse cultures where nearly as many people speak ancient indigenous languages as speak Spanish. I found
it fascinating and certainly exotic; yet, the words that kept coming to mind back then were pure, untouched, and
innocent. Much has changed in thirty-five years.
At the time of my first visit in 1968, Texaco had only just discovered petroleum in Ecuador's Amazon region. Today,
oil accounts for nearly half the country's exports. A trans-Andean pipeline built shortly after my first visit has since
leaked over a half million barrels of oil into the fragile rain forest—more than twice the amount spilled by the Exxon
Valdez. Today, a new $1.3 billion, three hundred-mile pipeline constructed by an EHM-organized consortium
promises to make Ecuador one of the world's top ten suppliers of oil to the United States. Vast areas of rain forest
have fallen, macaws and jaguars have all but vanished, three Ecuadorian indigenous cultures have been driven to
the verge of collapse, and pristine rivers have been transformed into flaming cesspools.
During this same period, the indigenous cultures began fighting back. For instance, on May 7, 2003, a group of
American lawyers representing more than thirty thousand indigenous Ecuadorian people filed a $1 billion lawsuit
against ChevronTexaco Corp. The suit asserts that between 1971 and 1992 the oil giant dumped into open holes and
rivers over four million gallons per day of toxic wastewater contaminated with oil, heavy metals, and carcinogens, and
that the company left behind nearly 350 uncovered waste pits that continue to kill both people and animals.
Outside the window of my Outback, great clouds of mist rolled in from the forests and up the Pastaza's canyons.
Sweat soaked my shirt, and my stomach began to churn, but not just from the intense tropical heat and the
serpentine twists in the road. Knowing the part I had played in destroying this beautiful country was once again taking
its toll. Because of my fellow EHMs and me, Ecuador is in far worse shape today than she was before we introduced
her to the miracles of modern economics, banking, and engineering. Since 1970, during this period known
euphemistically as the Oil Boom, the official poverty level grew from 50 to 70 percent, under- or unemployment
increased from 15 to 70 percent, and public debt increased from $240 million to $16 billion. Meanwhile, the share of
national resources allocated to the poorest segments of the population declined from 20 to 6 percent.
Unfortunately, Ecuador is not the exception. Nearly every country we EHMs have brought under the global empire's
umbrella has suffered a similar fate. Third world debt has grown to more than $2.5 trillion, and the cost of servicing
it—over $375 billion per year as of 2004—is more than all third world spending on health and education, and twenty
times what developing countries receive annually in foreign aid. Over half the people in the world survive on less than
two dollars per day, which is roughly the same amount they received in the early 1970s. Meanwhile, the top 1 percent
of third world households accounts for 70 to 90 percent of all private financial wealth and real estate ownership in
their country; the actual percentage depends on the specific country.
The Subaru slowed as it meandered through the streets of the beautiful resort town of Banos, famous for the hot
baths created by underground volcanic rivers that flow from the highly active Mount Tungurahgua. Children ran along
beside us, waving and trying to sell us gum and cookies. Then we left Banos behind. The spectacular scenery ended
abruptly as the Subaru sped out of paradise and into a modern vision of Dante's Inferno A gigantic monster reared up
from the river, a mammoth gray wall. Its dripping concrete was totally out of place, completely unnatural and
incompatible with the landscape. Of course, seeing it there should not have surprised me. I knew all along that it
would be waiting in ambush. I had encountered it many times before and in the past had praised it as a symbol of
EHM accomplishments. Even so, it made my skin crawl.
That hideous, incongruous wall is a dam that blocks the rushing Pastaza River, diverts its waters through huge
tunnels bored into the mountain, and converts the energy to electricity. This is the 156- megawatt Agoyan
hydroelectric project. It fuels the industries that make a handful of Ecuadorian families wealthy, and it has been the
source of untold suffering for the farmers and indigenous people who live along the river. This hydroelectric plant is
just one of many projects developed through my efforts and those of other EHMs. Such projects are the reason
Ecuador is now a member of the global empire, and the reason why the Shuars and Kichwas and their neighbors
threaten war against our oil companies.
Because of EHM projects, Ecuador is awash in foreign debt and must devote an inordinate share of its national
budget to paying this off, instead of using its capital to help the millions of its citizens officially classified as
dangerously impoverished. The only way Ecuador can buy down its foreign obligations is by selling its rain forests to
the oil companies. Indeed, one of the reasons the EHMs set their sights on Ecuador in the first place was because
the sea of oil beneath its Amazon region is believed to rival the oil fields of the Middle East. The global empire
demands its pound of flesh in the form of oil concessions.
These demands became especially urgent after September 11, 2001, when Washington feared that Middle Eastern
supplies might cease. On top of that, Venezuela, our third-largest oil supplier, had recently elected a populist
president, Hugo Chavez, who took a strong stand against what he referred to as U.S. imperialism; he threatened to
cut off oil sales to the United States. The EHMs had failed in Iraq and Venezuela, but we had succeeded in Ecuador;
now we would milk it for all it is worth.
Ecuador is typical of countries around the world that EHMs have brought into the economic-political fold. For every
$100 of crude taken out of the Ecuadorian rain forests, the oil companies receive $75. Of the remaining $25, three-
quarters must go to paying off the foreign debt. Most of the remainder covers military and other government
expenses—which leaves about $2.50 for health, education, and programs aimed at helping the poor. Thus, out of
every $100 worth of oil torn from the Amazon, less than $3 goes to the people who need the money most, those
whose lives have been so adversely impacted by the dams, the drilling, and the pipelines, and who are dying from
lack of edible food and potable water.
All of those people—millions in Ecuador, billions around the planet—are potential terrorists. Not because they believe
in communism or anarchism or are intrinsically evil, but simply because they are desperate. Looking at this dam, I
wondered—as I have so often in so many places around the world—when these people would take action, like the
Americans against England in the 1770s or Latin Americans against Spain in the early 1800s.
The subtlety of this modern empire building puts the Roman centurions, the Spanish conquistadors, and the
eighteenth- and nineteenth-century European colonial powers to shame. We EHMs are crafty; we learned from
history. Today we do not carry swords. We do not wear armor or clothes that set us apart. In countries like Ecuador,
Nigeria, and Indonesia, we dress like local schoolteachers and shop owners. In Washington and Paris, we look like
government bureaucrats and bankers. We appear humble, normal. We visit project sites and stroll through
impoverished villages. We profess altruism, talk with local papers about the wonderful humanitarian things we are
doing. We cover the conference tables of government committees with our spreadsheets and financial projections,
and we lecture at the Harvard Business School about the miracles of macroeconomics. We are on the record, in the
open. Or so we portray ourselves and so are we accepted. It is how the system works. We seldom resort to anything
illegal because the system itself is built on subterfuge, and the system is by definition legitimate.
However—and this is a very large caveat—if we fail, an even more sinister breed steps in, ones we EHMs refer to as
the jackals, men who trace their heritage directly to those earlier empires. The jackals are always there, lurking in the
shadows. When they emerge, heads of state are overthrown or die in violent "accidents." And if by chance the jackals
fail, as they failed in Afghanistan and Iraq, then the old models resurface. When the jackals fail, young Americans are
sent in to kill and to die.
As I passed the monster, that hulking mammoth wall of gray concrete rising from the river, I was very conscious of
the sweat that soaked my clothes and of the tightening in my intestines. I headed on down into the jungle to meet with
the indigenous people who are determined to fight to the last man in order to stop this empire I helped create, and I
was overwhelmed with feelings of guilt. How, I asked myself, did a nice kid from rural New Hampshire ever get into
such a dirty business?
Copyright 2006 John Perkins
Chapters
Table of Contents of Confessions of an Economic Hitman
PART I: 1963-71
1: An Economic Hit Man Is Born
2: "In for Life"
3: Indonesia: Lessons for an EHM
4: Saving a Country from Communism
5: Selling My Soul
PART II: 1972-74
6: My Role as Inquisitor
7: Civilization on Trial
8: Jesus - Seen Differently
9: Opportunity of a Lifetime
10: Panama: the President and Hero
11: Pirates in the Canal Zone
12: Soldiers and Prostitutes
13: Conversations with the General
14: Meeting the Novelist Graham Greene
PART III: 1974 - 81
15: Entering a New and Sinister Period in Economic History
16: The Saudi Arabian Money-laundering Affair
17: Financing Osama Bin Laden
18: Panama Canal Treaty Negotiations
19: Iran's King of Kings
20: Confessions of a Tortured Man
21: The Fall of a King
22: Colombia: Keystone to Latin America
23: American Democracy Vs. Global Empire
24: Ecuador's President Battles Big Oil
25: I Quit
Part IV: 1982 - Present
26: Ecuador: Presidential death - CIA Assassination?
27: Panama: Another Presidential death - CIA Assassination?
28: My Own Energy Company, Enron, and G. W. Bush
29: A New Breed of EHM
30: U.S. Invades Panama
31: Venezuela: Another EHM Failure
32: Ecuador Revisited
Epilogue
Chapter Summaries
Chapter 1- An Economic Hit Man Is Born
Perkins begins his novel with a few pages describing his family and childhood in rural New
Hampshire. He makes a point to mention that his family was middle class but they had very
little spending money for extravagant purchases. His parents taught at a prestigious all boy high
school, which he attended at no cost. He vividly recalls feeling like he didn't fit in with his
wealthy classmates, which helped to construct a psychological framework that, later in life, led
to his seduction into the underworld of dirty global politics. While growing up, he remembers
constantly being reminded by his parents of social class placement and structure. They stressed
attending a "good" university and staying away from questionable lower class, and largely poor,
people. Once at university, Middlebury in rural Vermont, Perkins went through something of a
rebellious phase. He rejected his parents incessant harping on class and achieving success in
life. He defiantly dropped out of school, giving up a full academic scholarship, in order to attend
Boston University. While living in Boston he became friends with his later wife, Ann. As a couple
barely out of school in the late sixties, John was fearful that he would be drafted and sent to
Vietnam. Ann set up an interview with an official from the National Security Agency for him
because those working for the NSA were exempt from the draft. Through a series of events and
interviews John was in line to receive a position as an economist within the Agency, however,
life was about to take a radical turn for the newly married couple. On a whim John attended a
seminar at Boston University focused on the topic of volunteering for the Peace Corps. John
had always dreamed of living with native peoples and coming to understand their cultural
practices so, after receiving some positive advice, he and Ann packed up and moved to Ecuador
to live with a native tribe. While living in Ecuador, serving as a Peace Corps volunteer, a man
from a private consulting firm came to visit John and Ann, which marked the beginning of
John's association with the world of political domination through economic control. The
consulting firm worked for the World Bank primarily. They submitted their analyses and
opinions of whether foreign governments should be granted huge loans by the World Bank to
fund development projects. The firm kept a very low profile. In fact, they were registered
officially as an engineering firm but at that time they were beginning to take on economists to
provide the World Bank with statistical information gathered on each project the bank was
considering funding. The agent from MAIN International Consulting Firm praised John and Ann's
efforts in the Central American jungle nation of Ecuador. He also requested that John analyze
the local political, social, and economic environment and report back to the NSA with his
observations. Perkins did so loyally. Upon the completion of their time with the Peace Corps
John was offered a job as an economist at MAIN International. Soon after being hired Perkins
came to realize that, although he was hired as an economist, his real job was much closer to
that of a secret, or double, agent.
Chapter 2- In For Life
After accepting the position and beginning his daily work at MAIN International Perkins began
to wonder what it was the MAIN International was in the business of doing. He observed the
way the company worked and was structured but he was unsure as to what the goal of the
corporation was as a whole. He remarks that there is an obvious gender bias with many women
working at the level of secretary but almost none in the executive ranks. The public library was
where Perkins spends most of his days researching his first assignment, the Indonesian island of
Java, as well as a possible future assignment, Kuwait. He studied the history of the countries
from economic and political perspectives. One day while studying up on the format of common
economic forecasts an attractive woman, Claudine, approaches Perkins. She explains to him
that she holds a very prestigious position within the corporation and she was to be his tutor, of
sorts, in actual position. She goes on to inform Perkins that he was handpicked to be an
Economic Hit Man. What that meant, essentially, was that Perkins was to make economic
predictions for the prospect of a country that may be granted a huge loan from the World Bank.
The linchpin being that Perkins was to always produce statistics that favored the loan being
granted and showed increased economic prosperity for the country as a direct result of
whatever the loan was to fund. Basically, on the long term if Perkins could be depended on to
produce the desired reports and statistics the loan would be funded by the World Bank. The
money from the loans went directly to international firms, like MAIN International, Bechtel, and
Halliburton, amongst others. The contractors were paid off and the country to which the loan
was granted would be left with a huge debt burden for many decades to come. The debt that
was owed would be used by the United States government to spread the American global
agenda. Because of the huge debt the leaders of such countries would submit to supporting US
military ventures, and providing political support. Claudine goes onto explain the history of
using economic power as a means of control and submission by the American government.
There is a brief foray into the 1951 ouster of the democratically elected leader of Iran,
Mohammed Mossadegh. This event marks the first occasion the American government
abandoned the typical pressure tactic of applying military might to affect the outcome of a
foreign dilemma, and instead opted for the more subtle techniques of bribery and threats. Then
she informs Perkins that he has a limited amount of time to decide whether or not he will
accept the position for which he was hired. She promises a very rewarding future for him in his
family but makes explicitly clear that once he accepts the job he is "in for life". Perkins is, at
first, hesitant that his actions will not produce a positive result for all affected by his work. He
concludes that he can do more good by working from the inside and that he was certainly the
exception to the rule in his profession. He was not going to be seduced by money, power, and
sex, although he had already been seduced quite completely by Claudine in the Boston Public
Library.
Chapter 3- Indonesia Lessons For An EHM
This chapter is basically an extremely brief overview of the history of political dominance in the
island nation of Indonesia. Perkins describes the long history of imperial domination by the
Dutch who leaders saw Indonesia as the crown jewel in their empire because of its spices and
rich fabrics. Early in the 20th century the Dutch finally gave up control over the islands of
Indonesia, which began a brief period of independence. A coup in 1965 resulted in Communist
forces aligned with the Chinese taking control. American fear of growing Communist powers
throughout the world prompted the US government to take action in Indonesia. They came up
with a program for providing electric power to Indonesia which would ultimately lead to an
ongoing American presence in the region. John's first assignment was to take assessment of the
proposed electrification plan. Before setting off, Perkins met Claudine for a private dinner in her
apartment. Once there she warned him to never speak of their meetings or that fact that they
had ever even met because she would deny it all. He also noted that, in fact, his relationship
with Claudine was completely separate from MAIN International and untraceable as all their
meetings had occurred in her apartment. Looking back in reflection Perkins sees that his
relationship with Claudine was one the major factors of his break up with his wife Ann.
Chapter 4- Saving A Country From Communism
The ideas and tales surrounding the ancient island nation of Indonesia enchanted John Perkins.
He could not wait to experience first-hand the exotic spices and women in elaborate colorful
costumes. When he did arrive, however, he was confronted with a very different reality. The
stuff of the stories was present but it was coupled with astounding poverty and filth. He
mentions black rivers and cardboard housing for a large segment of the Indonesian population
of Jakarta. The group of engineers and economists from MAIN International were all escorted
to a posh dinner in the penthouse of the nicest hotel in Jakarta, where they were to live for
three months while carrying out their mission. Charlie Illingworth, the project manager, is
described as a war connoisseur. He collected memorabilia and read book after book
documenting accounts from all kinds of wars throughout history. He explains that the mission is
to provide electricity to Java, the most populous place in the world. Of course there was also a
mission behind the mission which was to keep Communism out of the island nation and provide
all the electricity related infrastructure required for oil extraction, production, and exportation.
American corporations would be funded to provide the design and labor for the entire project,
which would bring many westerners to the nation and it would also help to build a relationship
between the Indonesian government and the American businessmen. America would then
doubly benefit by obtaining oil from newly efficient Indonesian producers. Perkins, although on
board with the mission, had trouble sleeping because he understood that his colleagues and his
goals were selfish and greedy. He could see that electricity and the promotion of capitalism
would not benefit the majority of Indonesian. It would make a few men at the top of the
population pyramid rich and force everyone else deeper into debt, despair, and poverty.
Chapter 5- Selling My Soul
The group of eleven men spent about one week in the capital city of Jakarta before Charlie
made the decision to move the group to a smaller city in order to escape the constant
distractions of the metropolis of Jakarta. The men visited the embassy and got all the necessary
paperwork for their stay in Indonesia in order. Then they were moved to Bandung, into a Dutch
colonial style villa. They were given a full staff of various servants in the villa and they each had
an off road vehicle with a private driver and translator at their disposal. Charlie explained that
the first few weeks were for gathering data, then the economic projection for growth would be
made, which would allow the engineers to design and build the necessary components of an
electrical system that would supply the power to the region. Charlie stressed over and over
again the importance of favorable economic forecasts, which made John understand his critical
nature to the project as a whole. One of the men on the team was an older gentleman that was
the chief load forecaster for the New England Electric System. Howard Parker is described as a
bitter old man who never was able to reach his own career goals. He and John had a
conversation about the plausibility of such a rosy economic forecast. The conversation upsets
Perkins because Howard accuses him of being in it for the money and cooking the numbers for
the benefit of a few. After much internal deliberation, Perkins comes to the conclusion that
even if he held the company line and made predictions that were designed to please his
employers rather than accurately predict the economic growth of the region, it would be no
problem because Howard would make accurate predictions and the company would prefer his
because of his seniority and rank. John Perkins slept well thinking he had solved his own
dilemma. The next morning however, Howard Parker is struck ill with a severe amoebic attack
and is forced to return to the United States.
Chapter 6- My Role as Inquisitor
Perkins meets the son of the caretaker of the estate that the group from MAIN are staying in in
Bandung. His name is Rasmon and he is a student of economics at the local university. John
assumes Rasy, as his friends call him, is going to ask him for a job eventually. Rasy teaches John
Bahasa Indonesia, which is a local Indonesian dialect that is simple and easy for foreigners to
pick up quickly. The men spend a lot of time together going on different trips to gather data.
Rasy decides one day to show Perkins the true Indonesia, the real city around them. John
remembers the night that he spent carousing with Rasy and his friends to be one of the most
enjoyable evenings during his stay in Indonesia. After a few weeks in Indonesia, Perkins takes
note that all of his meetings are planned ahead of time and the statistics and information he
seeks is presented to him in an oddly impersonal manner. He comments that all the officials he
set up meetings with would simply hand him a folder with data in it and that they would always
refer to him as an American interrogator in the local dialect. A feeling that the data he collected
was contrived by some higher government official, or perhaps someone holding a high position
within an international corporation, was one he could not shake.
Chapter 7- Civilization on Trial
Rasy invites Perkins to be his guest at a traditional Indonesian puppet show, called a dalang.
Perkins notes the beauty of the night at the outdoor setting of the show. He speaks of the food
which is passed around for everyone to enjoy. When the show starts, it is described as a feat of
true talent. Only one person operates all the puppets and does all of their voices. There is a
classic section of the performance which features Indonesian folk tales and historic traditions
and legends. Then the show took an unexpected turn. The characters of Richard Nixon, Uncle
Sam, and other world leaders took the stage. A map of the Middle East and Far East dropped
down as a back drop. The American president proceeded to take various countries off the map
and toss them into the garbage while shouting anti-Muslim epithets. Perkins grew
uncomfortable, but Rasy assured him that his presence at the show was acceptable and he was
perfectly safe. That type of political show for the public was commonplace and the ideas
presented in the performance were well known and accepted. After the show Perkins enjoyed
talking and carousing once again with Rasy and his friends. He was surprised at the general level
of knowledge of world affairs and international issues by common people in Indonesia. Perkins
is urged to read certain philosophic offerings by well known American writers in order to
increase his knowledge of the mindset of those in charge of American politics and foreign
affairs. Rasy and his friends put forward the notion that the next big conflict in the world will be
between Muslims and Christians because the West and the Christians have imperial goals and
the only group big and strong enough to take them on is the Muslims. A few days after the
memorable and thought provoking evening the local Indonesian politician featured in the
dalang, who stood up for the Indonesian culture and all oppressed peoples throughout the
world in the puppet show, was struck and killed by a hit and run driver.
Chapter 8- Jesus, Seen Differently
The night spent at the dalang affected Perkins in the days to come. He thought about the
performance and the response of the crowd. He considered the role of the United States
government in foreign countries and the role of American corporations in all levels of
government, foreign and domestic. He wondered whether any aide given to foreign countries
was done with the goal of altruism and generosity. All around him he saw corruption, greed,
and despair. Eventually, he came to the conclusion that the men he worked for truly believed
they were exporting freedom and economic growth to struggling people around the world.
Interestingly enough he comments that those countries that enjoy international power and
those whose citizens live in general ease are the same countries with the highest rates of
suicide, violet crime, drug abuse, divorce, and crime. The wealthiest societies are also the least
happy societies throughout history and all over the world. Perkins ponders whether the framers
of the Constitution would have supported what has become of their governmental experiment.
On his last night in Indonesia Perkins had a vivid dream of Jesus. Christ stood in front of him in
his dream as a man with curly black hair and a dark complexion. This Jesus heaved a car axle up
onto his shoulder and has a tire rim as a metallic halo. He said to Perkins, " If I were to come
now, you would see me differently....because the world has changed."
Chapter 9- The Opportunity of a Lifetime
Upon returning to Boston, John Perkins was summoned to the President of MAIN International.
Perkins was intimidated by this figure, Bruno Zambotti. He was worried about the end result of
their meeting. Bruno immediately told Perkins that Howard Parker had been fired due to his
lack of ability to accurately assess economic growth in any region, specifically Indonesia. Parker
had predicted a growth of only about seven or eight percent a year, which displeased many
people at MAIN headquarters. His low forecast made it less likely that analysts from the World
Bank would give their stamp of approval, which would detrimentally affect the possibility of a
loan being granted to the Indonesian government. Thus, Parker was fired and Perkins was
promoted to Chief Economist. After leaving the MAIN office building Perkins was eager to share
the news of his promotion with Claudine. He called, only to receive no response. He went to her
apartment and a young couple answered the door. They told him that they did not know any
person by the name of Claudine, and no forwarding address by the previous tenant was left.
Perkins was stunned. It was at that moment he realized how deeply he had embedded himself
in a dangerous game. All of the fantastic spy stories Claudine told him about before he left for
Indonesia were absolutely true. He left the apartment building in disbelief and a bit fearful for
his own future. Perkins still had to present his findings to the analysts from the World Bank. He
had to win their approval or his promotion and his job would be in jeopardy. After many hours
of being questioned and grilled relentlessly the analysts approved Perkins findings stating a
seventeen to twenty percent growth rate of the Indonesian economy as a direct result of the
electrical infrastructure loan. After receiving approval John Perkins was sent on a whirlwind
tour of major international cities to speak on behalf of the project and his companies role in it.
Many powerful people from foreign government praised John and his work. He felt powerful
but his doubts about the goodness and benevolent nature of his work stayed with him
constantly. He thought extensively on questions of a highly philosophic nature about power,
the nature of war, and who benefits from war. One afternoon Bruno summoned Perkins to his
office for another meeting. Once again nervous Perkins entered the room not knowing what to
expect. Bruno looked John squarely in the eye and offered him "the opportunity of a lifetime."
Chapter 10- Panama's President and Hero
While driving through a deluge of rain in Panama's capital Perkins sees a billboard featuring
Panama's president Omar Torrijos. He tells a brief, but fascinating history of Panama as a
nation, and the rise to power of Torrijos. The famed canal was actually began by the French in
the late nineteenth century. The project was riddled with obstacles and suffered tragedy after
tragedy. Eventually it was abandoned until Theodore Roosevelt took interest in completing it
with American support and financial backing. At the time Panama was a part of Colombia.
When the government in Bogota refused to sign over the canal zone to the U.S. Roosevelt sent
a warship down to threaten the local population. Under much duress the Columbian
government released the land and Roosevelt declared Panama "liberated" from Colombian
rule. A puppet government was established and the canal zone was granted to the U.S. to do
whatever it wished with. Panama was ruled by an elite group of families for eight generations
before the populist leader Torrijos rose through the military ranks of the Panamanian national
guard and got elected as President. He appealed to the poor and lower middle classes who had
not been represented in government at all. Perkins makes it a point to recognize that Torrijos
was neither aligned with Communist forces or the Western Anti- Communist forces. He was his
own leader, bringing independence and freedom to his people. Perkins writes about the
Monroe Doctrine and its ridiculous premise that the United States has special rights granted by
God over all the hemisphere. Under the doctrine, the U.S. could invade any nation that refused
to back U.S. policies. He also mentions the School of the Americas, which is located in the canal
zone of Panama. This establishment was designed and run by the U.S. government as a tropical
warfare training school which specialized in interrogation and covert operational skills.
Chapter 11- Pirates in the Canal Zone
John Perkins is introduced to his personal guide for the trip, Fidel. Together, the two men drive
through various parts of the canal zone and surrounding environs. Like Indonesia Perkins is
exposed to the poorest areas of the city. He sees standing fetid water and children with
distended stomachs begging for change in the streets. Then the two pass into the canal zone,
which is full of lush green landscaped lawns, country club resorts, and opulent mansions. Fidel
confides in John to express his sadness that many American who visit Panama, or those that live
in the canal zone, refuse to learn about the local culture. The two men run into an American
family picnicking on an old fort used to fight off English pirates many centuries ago. The father
underscores Fidel's point by extolling his gratitude for being American and living in the canal
zone. He was happy he didn't have to expose his family to what reality was for the people "over
there".
Chapter 12- Soldiers and Prostitutes
Fidel escorts Perkins to an area of Panama that borders the affluent Canal Zone. The area is run
down, dilapidated, and Fidel warns John to never return at night without an escort. As the two
men walk the street toward their destination,two boys playing in the street run right into them.
After apologizing, they explain they were playing a shoot out game where the older brother
was acting as the US General in charge of the canal zone, while the younger brother was a
native Panamanian looking for revenge and shouting for the general to go home. Fidel and John
arrive at a bar that features various women from neighboring Central American countries
stripping for off duty soldiers from the Canal Zone. Fidel explains that the waitresses are
Panamanian and are not to be touched by the men in the bar, however, the stripping women
are foreigners with virtually no protection from the whims of the soldiers. The room is lined
with Panamanian men with sharp eyes for everything going on in the bar. John and Fidel
converse about the plight of the stripping women and how they have found themselves
seemingly happy in such a depraved environment. Fidel illuminates the discussion with the
background information that many of the women had chosen to flee their country of origin
because of ruthless and brutal dictators. He said many of them had suffered through years of
violence and had lost much, if not all, of their families. Fidel notes that to them stripping for
soldiers is not so bad and it gives them the opportunity to make some cash to start out new
somewhere.
Chapter 13- Conversations with the General
Unexpectedly, Perkins is summoned to General Omar Torrijos for a conversation. Perkins
describes Torrijos as a typically dressed Panamanian but extremely well informed about world
events and the role of the United States and the CIA in international affairs. The two men speak
of the over throw of Mohamman Mossadegh in Iran in the early fifties that was orchestrated by
the CIA. Torrijos makes it known to Perkins that he is aware of the game companies like MAIN
and Bechtel are playing with poor countries around the world. He tells a fascinating, albeit
brief, history of Guatemala and United Fruit. Torrijos and his chosen subject of talk makes John
feel nervous as to what the nature of his visit is, so he asks directly, "Why did you invite me
here?" Torrijos explains that in order to follow through with his mission to modernize Panama
for the good of its people, including the poor, he must find a way to fund massive infrastructure
projects. He is averse to giving the contract to Bechtel for reasons discussed throughout the
chapter. He tells John that MAIN will receive the contract without dispute if John helps Torrijos
to send the message to the world over that Panama stands alone without the aide or backing
from China, Cuba, or the US. Perkins notes at the end of the chapter that an unspoken
understanding arose from that meeting that he would receive praise and large contracts if he
did the bidding of Torrijos on the world stage.
Chapter 14- Entering a New Sinister Period in Economic History
Perkins gives his account, from his perspective as chief economist at MAIN, of the formation,
and impact, of OPEC in the 1960's and the subsequent oil embargo of the early seventies. At the
beginning of this shift in economic practices, OPEC had the upper hand. The embargo crippled
the American economy and the industrial petroleum corporations. During that time, Perkins
would frequently meet with friends and debate the causes and effects that OPEC and the
embargo would have on the global economy. No one, he said, could have fully understood what
was really going to happen as a result of such actions. Perkins writes how the 1960's was a
pivotal point in global economic philosophy and practice. Robert McNamara was, in Perkin's
view, the single greatest influence in that shift. McNamara rose through the ranks of the Ford
Motor Company, eventually becoming the first president of the company that was not a
member of the Ford family in 1960. John F. Kennedy appointed him the Secretary of Defense
during his presidency. McNamara was an economist himself and he utilized his statistically
based economic theory to manage troop levels and funding for Vietnam. He promoted
"aggressive leadership", which became the new popular teaching method at top business
schools around the country. After his term as Secretary of defense McNamara moved on to
become the head of the World Bank. To many Robert McNamara was the embodiment of the
military-industrial complex. His various positions shocked many as they were an obvious breach
in the separation of powers. He headed a major corporation, a government cabinet, and an
international bank. Perkins notes that it did not surprise him in the least bit and he ends the
chapter with a long list of notable figures that played the same game with their respective
careers.
Chapter 15- The Saudi Arabian Money Laundering Affair
In the mid 1970's Saudi Arabia entered the international loan game, however, the House of
Saud played under different rules than countries like Indonesia and Ecuador because their
country had virtually infinite wealth. They could finance their own development projects. The
job of the EHM, in this circumstance, was to get leading parties in Saudi Arabia to, first, want to
develop the countries infrastructure, and then, get them to grant the contracts to American
firms. Perkins explains how this all came to be and how this unlikely alliance between the
United States and Saudi Arabia has endured and worked to both ignite tensions and subdue
foreign power over both countries respective economies. The US essentially accepted Saudi
Monies in Return for huge expensive contracts and favorable votes in all international
governing bodies. Saudi Arabia also agreed to increase oil production in the event of another
embargo brought on by other OPEC nations. This action basically undermines the power of
OPEC because the American consumer will never again have to feel the pinch of an oil shortage.
This shelter has become an issue revisited over and over again in the subsequent years since
the agreement was made. The two nations have also endured criticism for their "sweetheart"
deal from countries all around the globe. Perkins gives a very interesting personal account of
how these agreements came to be signed, and how the governments, international agencies,
and private corporations all worked together to achieve huge payouts and political capital.
Chapter 16- Pimping, and Financing Osama Bin Laden
The House of Saud stood as a unified decision making body, which meant that all high level
members of government had to be convinced to accept and sign the huge development
contracts MAIN put forward. Each MAIN agent was assigned a key government figure to wine,
dine, coerce, and convince. Perkins was responsible for Prince W., whose happiness and
pleasure was the utmost concern. Perkins was asked, and was able, to locate a beautiful
American women to entertain the prince during his frequent stays in Boston. Perkins was also
asked to pay for the expense which he did by coming up with creative expense accounts and
huge restaurant tabs. He knew he had to have the numbers to convince the prince but
supplying whatever small things he may need may have tipped the tables in his favor. Perkins
also fully understood if he failed to get the prince's approval and the contracts died then he
would be blamed at MAIN, and the price for failure was very high. In the end, perhaps due to a
United Airlines flight attendant, the entire package was approved by the royal family.
Everybody involved breathed a sigh of relief before celebrating their impending success. The
deal essentially reinvented Saudi Arabia overnight. What was desolate desert kingdom became
a sprawling decadent glistening modern metropolis. Also, as a result of the alliance between
the US and the Saudis both countries repeatedly found themselves unable to answer for their
actions when they voted again and again to protect each others interests in international
bodies. The most glaring example of this type of behavior that we are still living through today
is the finding that many of the terrorists aboard the planes which crashed into the World Trade
Center were Saudi nationals. Also, it was further found that Saudi Arabia although shaking the
hand of the US with one arm, is and has been funding terrorist cells with the other.
Chapter 17- Panama Canal Negotiations and Graham Greene
The contract with Saudi Arabia advanced Perkins career to even greater heights. He had a staff
which grew larger and larger and he was able to hire a Russian economist from MIT that had
developed a statistical approach to economic forecasts which "proved" the righteousness of
lending huge amounts of cash to countries that would never be able to pay it off. Torrijos, in
Panama, and Perkins honored their secret agreement and their relationship grew closer and
more complex throughout the seventies. Perkins published an article in The Boston Globe
promoting the return of the canal zone rights and property to Panama. Many of his peers were
disappointed with his position but his boss, Bruno, however, knew it would please Torrijos and
thus praised John for the decision to publish it. If Torrijos was happy, MAIN would continue
receiving huge contracts. Graham Greene, the fiction writer, had also written many articles in
support of Torrijos and his mission. The two had fostered an exceptionally close relationship
based on the common goal of wealth redistribution to aide the poor. In fact, Greene published
a nonfiction novel, titled Conversations with the General, about General Omar Torrijos. Perkins
met Greene one day in a Panamanian hotel lobby. This conversation was especially meaningful
and important to Perkins, as he was just barely becoming aware of how insidious his work was.
Chapter 18- Iran's King of Kings
This chapter focuses on the situation in Iran in the late seventies and how that country was
enticed into the fold of the corporatocracy. Iran, like Saudi Arabia, was oil rich and could
finance its own development. The shah, or king, was in power because when his father was
deposed of by a democratically elected president, Mohammed Mossadegh, the United States
sent CIA agents to remove him from power and reinstate the shah. This action made the
Persian population angry but the truth of us involvement was not proved for many years later.
The shah was friendly to US interests and Washington did its best to paint him and Iran in a
favorable light and as a strong ally in the increasingly caustic Middle Eastern region. Perkins
toured all over Iran in his many visits. During one common visit he was invited to have dinner
with a man he had never met before, named Yamin. When he arrived to the destination he was
escorted into a walled palace like restaurant filled with private booths. Yamin was very polite
and well dressed in a western business suit. As the two men talked Perkins realized that Yamin
knew much about his past and his entire career. Yamin spoke about the shah's plan to cover the
desert with green plants in order to change the landscape on a massive scale. Yamin
disapproved of this plan because, he said, the soul of the Persian people was so closely related
to the desert. He believed changing the landscape would destroy the culture. Towards the end
of the night Yamin requested that John go with him to meet a good friend who could give him a
lot of information about the shah and Iran as a whole. Yamin referred to Perkins as a man in the
middle of two worlds.
Chapter 19 - Confessions of a Tortured Man
A few days after their initial meeting, Yamin drove Perkins far outside the city to meet his friend
that went only by, Doc. The two men pulled up to a centuries old desert oasis and Perkins was
escorted inside a small hut. He was instructed to sit on the floor of the dimly lit room and wait.
An old man in a wheelchair was brought into the room and introduced himself. He said he was
once like Perkins. He had a high level job and powerful friends. He had money and knew many
heads of state from around the world. He spoke slowly, stopping to cough and wheeze
frequently. When he turned slightly, Perkins was astonished to see that he had no nose, only a
grotesque scar! When the conversation resumed the old man informed Perkins that the shah
was approaching Hitler in his evil ways. He became enraged while telling Perkins of the US
knowledge and complicity of the shah's tyrannical secret police, the SAVAK. He went on to say
that the shah was the only US ally in the region and that Muslim resentment was growing
rapidly. He warned that the shah would be overthrown soon and hatred of the US would grow.
He then told Perkins that MAIN would lose millions of dollars because the new ruling party
would simply refuse to pay.
Chapter 20- The Fall of a King
Despite the warnings of Doc coupled with the fact that Perkins had heard absolutely nothing
about a possible impending coup, Perkins remained in Tehran for an extended stay. One
evening in late 1978 while sitting at a cafe John ran into his old college buddy, Farhad. He had
not seen him in over a decade. As the two men caught up with each other it became obvious
that although Perkins had no inkling into the goings on or Farhad's life, Farhad knew quite a bit
about John's career and life in general. Farhad warned Perkins that Iran was indeed quickly
falling to pieces behind the curtain of the world stage. He urged John to accompany him to
Rome to escape the violence that was sure to come to Tehran soon. Perkins trusted Farhad and
thusly did not question him. They both flew out of Tehran the next day. Once in Rome Perkins
met and conversed with Farhad's father, who was an army man in Iran, and thusly had great
national pride. His father spoke about the arrogance and greed of the shah and the US policies
enacted for Iran. He told Perkins that the overthrow of Mossadegh is coming back to haunt the
Americans and the corrupt shah. He went on to say that the fall of the shah was only the
beginning of the direction the entire Muslim world was headed in. Two days after that dinner,
violent riots and bombings erupted in Tehran. The groundswell had begun and the shah's
power quickly diminished. Ayatollah Khomeini was the religious leader poised to take control of
the country. In early 1979 the shah fled the country under the guise of receiving urgent medical
care for cancer treatment in New York. A mob seized the US embassy in Tehran and held 52
Americans hostage for 444 days, an event which essentially ended Carter's presidency. The
shah was eventually given refuge in Panama, under Torrijos, amidst worldwide calls for his
extradition back to Iran for a trial and sentencing. Doc's predictions had all come true. MAIN
lost millions in Iran. The ayatollah simply refused to pay for the projects the shah had begun,
which angered many international firms. The loss of revenue changed the manner in which US
policymakers dealt with Iran. Increasingly negative rhetoric regarding the country and its
leaders began to become more and more common. The days of painting Iran as a US ally in the
Middle East were over. These events forced Perkins to see the true role of the US in the world.
He remarked that the CIA refused to divulge information that showed US intentions to be less
than charitable, even to those members of the corporatocracy. He believed the CIA must have
known what was about to happen in Iran but because money was still rolling in the CIA
encouraged everyone to close their eyes to it.
Chapter 21 - Colombia: Keystone of Latin America
A return to the old game of getting poor countries to sign contracts that they could never repay
was what was presented to Perkins in Colombia. Colombia is described as being the
geographical and political gateway to South America. In this chapter Perkins provides a brief
history of this country and its culture. He notes that Colombia is rich in natural resources and
has a long textured history, but its people have also seen their share of violence and corruption.
Perkins saw Colombia as a sort of refuge for him despite the harm he and his company were
perpetrating against the nation. It was where he met an important figure in his life, Paula. She
was an Italian fashion designer with factories in Colombia. Paula helped John, in a gentle and
kind manner, to see the fallacies underpinning his rationale for working as an Economic Hit Man
for MAIN. Through conversation and prodding she brought him to honestly reviewing his
decisions. Perkins believes life is composed of a series of coincidences over which we have no
control, however, once we are presented with those coincidences, we must make choices.
What makes the difference in life is how we respond; what choices we make at those critical
crossroads in life. All decisions, he explained, bring you to your current station in life. Paula was
a coincidence that forced Perkins to a decision about the direction his life was headed in. She
was the catalyst that caused him to question his role.
Chapter 22 - American Republic Versus Global Empire
Paula and Perkins engage in a conversation about a recent guerrilla attack on a MAIN project
site. The working class indigenous people in Colombia detested the dam that was being built
because they didn't want the land in the valley it was being constructed in to be flooded. They
vowed to see them destroyed before they were ever completed, no matter the cost. A
Colombian foreman, Manual Torres, had been threatened by a militant group wielding AK-47's.
When Torres informed Perkins of the clash, Perkins intimidated him by claiming the militants
were not simply working Colombian peers of the foreman, rather they were a group of pro-
communism bandits working on behalf of China and Russia. He said that it was evident by the
fact that they carried AK-47's, a gun designed and built in Russia. Perkins knew this wasn't true
and that Torres was scared, however he pressured him to keep working on the project. Paula
questioned Perkins and forced him to look inside himself regarding that matter. She informed
him that her brother had been imprisoned and tortured before joining a rebel faction himself.
Because of that she was privy to a lot of information regarding the philosophy driving such
groups to action. Perkins was shocked to hear of her close ties to the movement which was
directly against his work. After further consideration, John began to think about the differences
between the ideals of America when it was a new nation as compared to what he saw
happening around him then, in the late 1970's. He drew the distinction between the American
Republic and a global empire. He wrote : "The republic offered hope to the world. Its
foundation was moral and philosophical rather than materialistic. It was based on the concepts
of equality and justice for all"....."The global empire, on the other hand, is the republic's
nemesis. It is a self-centered, self-serving, greedy, and materialistic, a system based on
mercantilism. Like empires before, its arms open only to accumulate resources, to grab
everything in sight and stuff its insatiable maw. It will use whatever means it deems necessary
to help its rulers gain more power and riches."
Chapter 23 - The Deceptive Resume
Perkins reflects on his own awakening to the true nature of his work and how it is
misrepresented on his seeming top notch resume. He explains how MAIN would update his
resume for him with each new project he took on and completed, so when he did decide to find
his resume to take a look at it the material was all new to him. The resume listed a number of
"clients served", the most interesting of which was the last line that read, "U.S. Treasury
Department, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia". Perkins notes the strangeness of these two entities
being listed on one line, together. He explains that the wording and placement of those
"clients" is actually a tip off to those in the inner circle of international business that he had
been one of the architects of the biggest infrastructure deal the world had ever seen. As he
thinks about the resume and the work he had done to earn such credentials, he laments at the
falsity of the document. He knows that, although the resume portrays him as an intelligent
shining gem, he had to stoop to low levels and do a lot of dirty work throughout the years. The
resume was a subtle, but monumental, deception. Perkins knew the only reason he had met
with so much success was because he, time and again, produced result that the company had
hoped for. He found a way to make the stockholders massive amounts of money. He had never
been good at mathematics and didn't even have a degree in economics, yet he found himself in
the position of Chief Economist at a major international engineering and consulting firm. He
had made it a practice to hire people more capable than him at doing his job and put undo
pressure on them to produce the results he knew those in higher up positions wanted. The
production of positive forecasts, no matter the method was what he was good at.
Chapter 24 - Ecuador's President Battles Big Oil
Ecuador's Jaime Roldos was the ideological match to Panama's Omar Torrijos. Torrijos wanted
canal rights in order to serve the greatest good for his people. He wanted to redistribute wealth
and land to the poor people of his country. Roldos ran on the same populist, nationalist
platform completely unaffiliated with super-powers, like Russia, China, or the U.S. In contrast,
however, Roldos had to fight multi-national oil corporations in his bid to control Ecuador's vast
oil reserves. His biggest competitor was Texaco. It was rumored that in Ecuador the big oil
companies had colluded with, and bought out, one group of Christian missionaries. The SIL, or
Summer Institute of Language, had a stated goal of teaching English to native tribes people
throughout the Central American region. IN doing so the missionaries would also introduce
those they were teaching to Christianity and urge them to set up and attend church services.
The SIL was accused of persuading indigenous tribes to move off their native lands to central
camps in order to receive free food, health care, and education. In return the tribes people had
to agree to sign their land over to oil companies for exploration. The missionaries were sent to
areas that had been speculated by large oil companies and deemed to have vast subsoil oil
reserves. Perkins admires Roldos and other leaders like him for having the courage to stand up
to powerful organizations for the good of people who could never pay him back. Being in his
position, he now understands the lengths to which greed and power will drive someone.
Perkins is more and more conflicted with his role and his actions over his career. He is haunted
by his past ideals and feels like he has sold out on his own convictions. At the end of the
chapter he notes, Bruno Zambotti, his boos and mentor had been fired by an aging CEO, Mac
Hall, who felt threatened by the shining star in the company.
Chapter 25 - I Quit
The firing of Bruno rippled though the various offices and divisions of MAIN International. The
chairman had fired Bruno because he was threatened by his powerful nature and incredible
profit earnings the company had produced under his command. Mac Hall was afraid that the
board would deem him ineffectual and give Zambotti his job. Hall fired Bruno while he still
could. To take his place, Hall promoted Paul Priddy, an economic forecaster that focused on
MAIN's domestic projects primarily. Perkins describes Priddy as a company man that would
bend to the wishes of Mac Hall in a second, no matter what they were. He stood no threat to
the chairman, so in Hall's eyes he was the perfect hire. However, the company suffered as a
result of poor leadership decisions from that point on. The overwhelming majority of MAIN
employees believes Hall had lost touch with the burgeoning trends in economic forecasting and
wondered in what direction the company would head from there. No one dared challenge the
Chairman, in fear of losing their own job. Perkins goes on a sailing trip to the Virgin Islands with
a young woman who works for him. Hos own inner battle rages on and has been steadily
intensifying. Despite perfectly pleasant surroundings , Perkins cannot get his mind to rest, so he
decides to take a small row boat and go ashore alone. He sits atop a wall of an old sugar cane
plantation and contemplates the lives and experiences of the slaves that died building that wall
and the men who dragged those slaves from their homes and families in Africa to come and
work themselves to death in the Caribbean. He became so enraged that he picked up a stick
and began beating the wall over and over until he reached exhaustion. He realized his rage
should be directed inward, for the deeds he had chosen to commit himself. He hated the life he
had created for himself despite all the superficial ornamentation and affluence of it. He could
live with no longer. When he returned to Boston, on April 1, 1980, he quit.
Chapter 26 - Ecuador's Presidential Death
As Claudine had predicted, it was not easy to leave the life and employment of an Economic Hit
Man. Perkins had a new boss, Paul Priddy who believed his resignation to be an April Fool's Day
joke at first. His colleagues, staff, and friends tried to talk him out of quitting by listing all the
positive attributes of the job and its benefits. Many of them were suspicious of his motives,
thinking he was possibly headed toward a career in politics that might expose their crimes and
way of life. He tried to offset such ideas by telling people he wanted to travel and work for
National Geographic. In the end, he was not able to fully extract himself from the lifestyle or his
position. He accepted the job of being an expert witness for public utility companies seeking
building permits from the state for new power plants. Right about the same time that Perkins
chose to quit, Carter lost the presidency to Reagan, which signified a major shift in foreign
policy. Carter has solar panels installed on the roof of the White House to spark a nationwide
discussion regarding dependence on foreign oil and dependence on oil as our sole energy
source. Reagan had the panels immediately removed upon taking office, as many in his cabinet
had made their fortunes in oil or in the building of its required infrastructure. Perkins describes
the differences between Reagan and Carter, the most striking of which is how Carter's vision of
America was aligned with the Declaration of Independence and how Reagan's view was "most
definitely that of a global empire builder." Perkins was enamored with men like Torrijos AND
Jaime Roldos in Ecuador. He is obviously saddened when he writes of the sudden death of
Roldos in a plane crash in spring 1981. The world reacted with the outcry of "CIA
Assassination!!", however, the US media barely covered the event at all.
Chapter 27 - Panama: Another Presidential Death
Perkins writes again of his sadness over the death of Roldos but, to him, it was an expected
end. He feared for Torrijos because he refused to bend at all to the desires of the US regarding
the renegotiation of the Canal Treaty. Torrijos stood up to Reagan and rejected the SIL
missionaries from Panama. Just a couple months after the strange and freak death of Roldos,
Torrijos experienced his own plane crash. Security guards claimed the plane had a bomb on
board and once again the world cried out,"CIA Assassination!!". Graham Greene opened his
book,Getting to Know the General, with the news and the accusations. Perkins explains the
atmosphere in Washington that led to the murder of Roldos and Torrijos. He makes clear that
the primary goal of the new administration was to expand the global empire and their financial
holdings rooted therein. They would stop at nothing to achieve this goal. Reagan, Bush, Cheney,
Casper Weinberger, George Shultz, and Robert McNamara were named among others as
facilitating a foreign policy that resulted in great reward for themselves and few other and great
misery for the masses of poor around the world. Perkins explains how Bechtel Inc. enjoyed a
close relationship with those holding high office in the U.S. Government, which resulted in
many new contracts and lots of comfortable perks and paychecks. Those in power at Bechtel
were chief critics of Panama's leaning toward granting a huge engineering contract for the
update of the canal to a Japanese firm. Bechtel stood to lose out on millions of dollars and the
biggest construction contract in modern times. Headed by George Shultz and Casper
Weinberger, Bechtel was a significant factor in policy toward Panama. Torrijos was replaced by
Manuel Noriega, a man who, in Perkins' view, had no chance in standing up Reagan, Bush, and
Cheney.
Chapter 28 - My Energy Company, Enron, and George W. Bush
Perkins struggled with his role as an expert witness because he was testifying under oath that
he believed in the accuracy of his economic predictions although he absolutely knew them to
be wholly false. He stuck with it, however, because it gave him a lot of free time while still
bringing in an admirable salary. During the early 1980's Perkins remarried a woman, named
Winifred, and their daughter, Jessica, was born. Winifred's father happened to have spent his
career working as an executive at Bechtel. Despite the fact that Winifred was a committed
environmentalist, her first job out of college at UC Berkeley was at Enron. Perkins once again
quit his job, but this time he started his own company. He launched Independent Power
Systems, a company "whose mission included developing environmentally beneficial power
plants...". Perkins receiving financial backing and support from Bruno Zambotti, and a host of
major players and companies, including the U.S. Congress. IPS along with Bechtel revolutionized
the power industry by building coal power plants that did not cause acid rain to fall in
surrounding areas. MAIN completely folded and went out of business during that time as well.
Mac Hall had lost touch with the direction of the energy market and no one informed him, just
as Bruno predicted. A rising star, Enron, was a little known company that , virtually out of no
where, began putting together huge deals. No body in the field could figure out how they could
finance such endeavors. Perkins provides a brief history of the flailing career of George W.
Bush, beginning at Arbusto Energy, which flopped, and became a part of Harken Energy. Bush
Jr. remained on the board and suddenly the fledgling Harken began to land huge contracts, the
most conspicuous of which was the right to drill oil off the coast of Bahrain. Harken beat out
Amoco in that deal. Bush Sr. had just been elected president and had arranged the talks
between Bahraini officials and his son's company.
Chapter 29 - I take a Bribe
While McNamara served as secretary of defense and president of the World Bank the ideas of
aggressive leadership and empire furtherance no matter the short term cost spread like wildfire
throughout the whole corporate world. Although alternative energy sources existed, the fact
that almost the entire Bush administration had made money in oil prevented expansion and
distribution of these technologies to the public. Instead, more insidious methods of corporate
domination and globalization surged forward. Poerkins sold IPS and became a very well paid
adviser on the board of a growing energy company, Stone and Webster Engineering and
Construction. In return he had to agree not to write about the work he did at MAIN or his work
with Stone and Webster. Perkins was, in fact, in the process of writing just such a book, but he
put his writing on the shelf to earn more money once again. He explains that he felt like he had
once again betrayed himself, his family, and his country.
Chapter 30 - The United States Invades Panama
This chapter is focused on Manuel Noriega and the U.S. invasion of Panama. Perkins exposes
the US position superficial and dishonest in many ways. He claims the invasion sprung out of
the deep seated fear of George Bush Sr. that the American people believed him to be a wimp.
He wanted to prove his power and strength to everyone. He ordered an air attack on Panama
city that was the largest such attack by the US since World War II. Many civilians died and the
administration claimed they were punished Noriega for his illegal drug running and corrupt
activities. The media endeavored to paint Noriega as a dangerous mad man, and an evil
communist sympathizer. Panama posed no threat to US national security and could not have
possibly launched any counter attack back. Perkins was thrown into depression upon
questioning his own role in furthering such injustice throughout the world. He attempts to give
a reasonable explanation as to how good people can participate in such heinous acts that result
in mass suffering and death of millions of desperate people throughout the world. Perkins
believes that the invasion of Panama in 1989 symbolized the whole system of corruption,
greed, and global domination. It showed the lengths that powerful men and women would go
to to protect and expand their assets. After the mission, Cheney publicly claimed 300 to 500
Panamanian civilians died, while independent human rights groups estimated the number of
dead between three and five thousand.
Chapter 31 - An EHM Failure in Iraq
In this chapter, Perkins focuses in the state of Iraq in the late eighties and nineties. He explains
how he was privy to information about the country and its political and economic state of
affairs that few others knew about at all. Companies like Bechtel and Halliburton were hoping
to strike lucrative deals in Iraq with Saddam Hussein. They had grand visions of Iraq becoming
the sister state to Saudi Arabia, however, due to Iraq's much more bountiful water supply and
the fact that it shares borders with many strategic Middle Eastern nations, Iraq was even more
of a gem to economists. By the late eighties it became apparent that Hussein was not about to
buy into what the engineering firms were proposing. This shamed the Bush Administrations and
added to the fear that the public saw President Bush as a wimp, or spineless leader. When Iraz
invaded Kuwait, the Bush Administration had the opportunity to redeem itself without public
protest. The President denounced the unilateral invasion of a defenseless country as a serious
breach of international law less than a year after the American invasion of Panama. Perkins
recalls the excitement of his colleagues over the invasion because a U.S. victory was sure to
bring in huge profits for their companies, and in turn themselves. He continues working on his
book and began guiding small groups of tourists deep into the Amazon to spend time and learn
from native tribes. As Perkins became more and more involved in the non-profit world, he was
eventually able to quit his consulting job completely.
Chapter 32 - September 11th and its Aftermath For Me, Personally
Perkins explains what it was like for him the moment the twin towers came down. He was in
the Amazon at a radio relay hut listening over the hand held radio to radio broadcasts with
minute by minute accounts of the scene in lower Manhattan. He made the decision that upon
returning to the U.S. that he must visit ground zero and see the devastation himself, with his
own eyes. In November of 2001 he got there. As he walked around the massive hole in the
ground, with smoke still billowing out, he tried to take in the enormity of the scene. The sights
and sounds and his own thoughts as to what caused this horrific event stained his memory. He
explains a few strange coincidences that occurred to him throughout that day while strolling
around the area. It seems every place Perkins chooses to sit and rest a moment conjures up a
memory or image of classic American ideals or notes a proud American foundation. He speaks
with an Afghan immigrant. He turns the events of September 11th, his career, his family, and
his personal truth over and over in his mind as he walks around.He sees a newspaper stand
with a man shouting the headline; "Venezuela on the brink of Revolution".
Chapter 33 - Venezuela Saved By Saddam
Venezuela is a country as rich with oil as it is with culture and history. Perkins provides a brief
summary of the recent political history of Venezuela and the actions of its present leader, Hugo
Chavez. Throughout the twentieth century Venezuela has been a prized nation by economists
and engineers, which has made it a target for EHM's and the corporatocracy. Until Chavez was
elected in the late nineties the country lacked a leader with enough strength and charisma to
stand up to the corporate behemoth. Venezuelan oil was being pumped out of the ground for
the profit of foreign companies and the country was saddled with immense debts at the time
Chavez was elected. Upon taking power Chavez enacted bold and sweeping new laws which
strengthened his control over government and its functions and he assumed total control over
the state run oil company, Petroleos De Venezuela. Perkins explains how the U.S.
Administration and the CIA took the same course of action in Venezuela to discredit the
countries democratically elected leader as they did in Iran, with Mossadegh in the 1950's.
Agents of the US government infiltrated Venezuela and worked to foment a strike of oil workers
in order to destabilize the government and force people to doubt the intentions of their
populist leader. The strike occurred and a coup was attempted. In fact, there were reports that
Chavez had been ousted form office, but surprisingly Chavez was able to hold onto the reigns of
government and quell the fears of the nation. The CIA has failed. He regained control and fired
any government official that he suspected of colluding with US agents. Perkins suspicions were
confirmed when, quite coincidently, a colleague confided that the strikes and coup were
completely orchestrated by people working for the US government.
Chapter 34 - Ecuador Revisited
Once again, Perkins visits Ecuador, thirty five years after he served in the Peace Corps there as a
young man, just out of college. He drove the winding Andean roads and took mental note of
the areas that had been vast stretches of Amazonian rain forest and were now desolate fields
overgrown with weeds. The tiny oil rich country and its inhabitants were saddled with massive
debt to international monetary firms that were putting more and more pressure on the
government to pay up by conceding drilling rights throughout the country to massive
international oil companies. Native tribal leaders held a meeting to discuss the current state of
affairs and present a unified course of action to the public in order to counteract the oil
conglomerates. Elders shared stories of people from within their own communities that had
sold out for big money and big dreams to oil executives. Many people asked Perkins about the
impending US invasion in Iraq. They wanted to know what the standpoint of the country was;
what the purpose of going to war was. He was struck by the irony that although the average US
citizen thought the native people of the Amazon region to be uneducated and brutish they
were actually much more aware of the state of international affairs and asked much more
poignant questions with regards to US actions. In fact, Perkins asserts that the average US
citizen knew less and asked fewer questions of relevance to their leaders than these people
who lived deep in the jungles of South America.The native peoples seemed to know more
about current events as well as position held in the past by many prominent American
statesmen. Many ancient cultures around the globe prophesied that the period of years from
the late nineties and into the first couple decades after the year two thousand would mark a
great shift in human history. A age of remarkable change in our collective perceptions of the
world around us and our direction therein was imminent. Perkins reflects on this idea in regards
to choosing to focus attention on what truly matters in the world rather than endlessly trying to
attain superficial and short term entertainment. He writes of his hope that those in power will
awaken to a deeper purpose and a more profound sense of self and role, which will motivate
them to use their position and their power to alleviate undo suffering and strife around the
globe.
Chapter 35 - Piercing the Veneer
This final chapter focuses on the reasons behind, and the possible implication of the 2003
invasion into Iraq. Perkins knows that had Saddam have been able to be bought out by the
corporatocracy, and accepted their terms, he would still be in power today. He goes on to say
that indeed US firms would be building and maintaining his chemical weapons plants, selling
him arms, and turning a blind eye to his human rights violations. From his perspective, as a
former EHM, Perkins offers several views of the invasion and it s outcome that may surprise the
reader. One of which is the idea that the dollar stands on very shaky ground as the standard
global currency. He writes that if that right were to be taken away from the US the foundations
of the entire empire would rumble and quake. If the standard currency were to change the US
would find itself in insurmountable debt extremely quickly. Perkins then proposes that any
major international group, like OPEC, could simply decide to do their banking in another
currency. However, Perkins also explains that one possible reason for the invasion in Iraq is that
if the US controlled Iraq and its vast oil fields then the US could render OPEC obsolete. OPEC
could change its supply or production but it would fail to produce any political pressure because
the biggest oil consumer, the US, could simply pump its oil free of charge in Iraq. This type of
scenario would also undermine any agreements made strictly with Saudi Arabia. Because the
US is no longer dependent on the country's oil, we, as a nation, would probably not honor our
end of the bargain at all. To close the book, and end the journey, Perkins returns to the theme
of his own inspiration from the principles of the founding fathers and what drove them to take
bold stands and risk their own safety for the idea of a free republic. The conclusion he reaches
is that those men, as well as men and women around the world today, have and are inspired by
the written word. Words propelled by a passionate desire to be free and to shake off the chains
of repression and submission are the single most powerful catalyst to revolution. The words of
the past served to inspire, inform, awaken, and spark the population and Perkins hopes his
words have served the same purpose in the mind and heart of the reader.
End
READ PAPER