The pythagorean relationship between Pi, Phi and e
The pythagorean relationship between Pi, Phi and e
The pythagorean relationship between Pi, Phi and e
THE PYTHAGOREAN RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PI, e, AND Phi
Peter Felicetti BE(Civil) BArch(Hons)
1
Director, Felicetti Pty Ltd and Bollinger Grohmann Felicetti Pty Ltd Consulting Engineers,
4th Floor, 145 Russell Street, Melbourne 3000, Australia.
E-mail: peter@felicetti.com.au
Summary: This paper has been prepared to demonstrate a Pythagorean relationship between three
transcendental and irrational numbers , , and π , creating a triangle with internal angles of 30o, 60o
and 90o within an accuracy of 1% in 2 dimensions. and to within 0.02% by incorporating the
imaginary number i, √-1, in the 3 dimensional relationship.
1. INTRODUCTION
The possible geometric relationship between , , and π has always held a fascination with the
author as a result of experimentation with deriving novel mathematical proportioning relationships
during his engineering and architectural studies. Whilst there are documented cases of relationships
between and π, (Eulers formula eπi + 1=0) and , and π, to date there is no evidence that there
has been developed a relationship between all three.
This paper presents the results of the authors investigations and discoveries.
2. Pi
= 3.141592653589793
Is an irrational number which means that it cannot be expressed exactly as fraction. It is also a
transcendental number. It is the ratio of a circle’s circumference to it’s diameter.
A transcendental number is described as an irrational number that is not the root of an algebraic
equation that has rational coefficients. The number pi cannot be expressed as the root of an
equation but only as the limit of some type of infinite process. (1)
An approximation of to 6 decimal places is 355/113. √10 is also an approximation of
3. Phi
= 1.618033988749894
The ubiquity of in mathematics aroused the interest of many mathematicians in the Middle Ages
and during the Renaissance. In 1509 there was published a dissertation by Luca Pacioli, De Divina
Proprtione which was illustrated by Leonardo da Vinci.4
The numerical value of phi is calculated by dividing a line AC, such that AB= x and BC=1 so that
AB/BC=x=phi
(x+1)/x = x/1 i.e x2 – x – 1 =0. The positive solution of this is x = (1 + √5)/2 = 1.61803..=
Phi Is the golden ratio. It is also an irrational and a transcendental number, and reveals itself in the
world of nature, associated with phyllotaxis, with the patterns of florets in flowers, with the shape of
the nautilus shell and with other natural objects.4
4. e
= 2.7182818284590452
Is Eulers number. It is an irrational and a transcendental number. The base of natural logarithms
(also known as Napierian logarithms, although without historical justification) and the limit of
(1+1/n)n as n approaches infinity. e is an irrational number and is represented by a nondetermining,
non repeating decimal. The irrationality of e was proved in 1737 by Euler. Charles Hermite in 1873
proved that e is transcendental: that is, it cannot be a solution of a polynomial equation with integer
coefficients. (2)
An approximation of e is 878/323
5. Imaginary number
The imaginary number is √-1. Specifically it is defined as one of the two solutions of the equation
X2 + 1 = 0.
Now to solve this equation means to find a number whose square is -1. Of course, no real number
will do, because the square of a real number is never negative. Thus in the domain of real numbers
the equation above has no solutions. 2
6. Pythagoras
This famous theorem, which we clearly associate with geometry, is also the basis for the field of
trigonometry and finds its way into countless other areas, such as art, music, architecture and
various fields of mathematics.3
In its most basic sense, the Pythagorean Theorem states that if you draw a square on each side of a
right triangle, the sum of the areas of the two smaller squares (i.e. those on the perpendicular sides)
is equal to the area of the square drawn on the hypotenuse (the longest side).
This relationship is accredited to the Greek philosopher Pythagoras ( ca. 575-495 BCE)
7. Pythagorean triples
Integers that represent the sides of a triangle that have a Pythagorean relationship + = c
are known as Pythagorean triples3.
(3,4,5), (5,12,13), (7, 24, 25) etc.
The smallest triple is (3,4,5). Ancient Egyptian surveyors used ropes with 13 knots evenly spaced,
and divided into segments in the ratio 3:4:5 to create a right angle triangle to accurately align their
constructions.
8. The Pythogorean relationship between pi, e, and Phi
The author proposes the following relationship;
+ = π
= 9.869604397
= 2.618033986
= 7.389056096
+ ≅ π
2.618033986 + 7.389056096 = 10.00709008
10.00709008/9.869604397 = 1.013930212 i.e within 1%
Artan (/) = Artan (0.595241439) = 30.76286101° i.e approx 30°
Artan (/) = Artan (1.679990561) = 59.23713898° i.e approx 60°
Ideally,
60
90 30
Further
+ ≅ 10
10.00709008/10 = 1.000709008 i.e within 0.1%
− = 0.100247842
− ≅ 1/10
10( − ) ≅ 1
Alternatively, a more precise relationship
!.""" + = π
Approximated to within 1%
$/%
# + = π
9. Alternative approximations
60
$
(#%)/
90 30
60
/2
90 30
10. Geometrical relationships
In typical Pythagorean fashion when added, the areas of two squares generated by the sides of a
right triangle will equal the area of the square of the hypotenuese
60
90 30
Consider the three squares
Square A of length , Square B of length , and Square C of length
The areas of Squares A and B combined will equal the area of Square C in the following relationship
+ = π
Similarly this can be undertaken with any similar geometrical figure generated by the sides of a right
triangle3. For example when added, the areas of two circles generated by the sides of a right triangle
will equal the area of the circle of the hypotenuse.
60
90 30
Consider the three circles
Circle A of diameter , Circle B of diameter , and Circle C of diameter
The areas of Circles A and B combined will equal the area of Circle C in the following relationship
( )/4 + ( )/4 = (π& )/4
11. Pythagorean relationship between ', ( )*+ ,, -* . +-/0*1-2*1
a2 + b2 + c2 = d2
+ + 3 = π
2.6179...+ 7.389...(√-1)2x 0.137
Therefore z = i/2.698 or i/e where i= √-1
To an accuracy of 0.02%
'4 + (4 + (5/()4 = 64
CONCLUSION
The author has discovered a pythagorean relationship between transcendental numbers, that will
provide some new insights into these numbers.
Bibliography
1. Sphere Packing, Lewis Carroll and Reversi Martin Gardner Cambridge University Press 2009
2. E: the story of a number Eli Maor Princeton University Press 2009
3. The Pythagorean Theorem; Alfred S. Posamentier Prometheus Books
The Story of its Power and Beauty
4. The Divine Proportion H.E.Huntley Dover Books
A Study in mathematical Beauty
READ PAPER
