Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2009, Fisheries Research
… FISH WITH EMPHASIS …
Difficulties in Age Readings from Dorsal Spines of Spiny Dogfish Squalus acanthias L., 17582005 •
THE PROCEEDINGS OF …
SEASONAL VARIATION OF Hysterothylacium aduncum INFECTION IN THE COMMON GUITARFISH, Rhinobatos rhinobatos IN ISKENDERUN BAY (NORTH- …2005 •
Tropical Shrimp Fisheries and their Impact on Living resources
Venezuela REVISION DE LA PESCA DE ARRASTRE EN VENEZUELA2001 •
In 1997, the trawlers landed 3 665 t of shrimp (brown shrimp (Penaeus brasiliensis, P. subtilis and P. notialis), white shrimp (P. schmitti) and “titi” (Xyphopenaeus kroyeri) and almost 23 000 t of fish and molluscs. Almost two thirds of the shrimp are landed in the west of the country. In 1997 the fleet in operation consisted of 351 trawlers, almost all with outriggers. The minimum codend mesh size is 32 mm. All trawls are equipped with a Turtle Excluder Device. The ratio shrimp to total catch varies from 1:17 to 1:40. One third of the by-catch is normally landed, the remainder is discarded, essentially small fish (80% of which are juveniles from species with commercial interest). Most shrimp are exported and the fish, including so called “by-catch” which is landed, is sold on the domestic market. Research has been carried out for years regarding shrimp fisheries: to estimate the amount of by-catch, its composition and geographical distribution; to reduce the discards by installing escape panels in the trawl. After the introduction of TED, the impact of the device on the general catch was assessed: significant losses were found in the capture of fish, molluscs and shrimp. More recently, some research has been carried out on the utilization of unavoidable by-catch. The main problems reported include, in particular: overexploitation of shrimp resources, particularly
2005 •
Abstract A total of 244 individuals of the common guitarfish, Rhinobatos rhinobatos (TL range: 31-144 cm), were obtained between March 2003 and February 2005 from commercial fishing vessels in Iskenderun Bay, North-eastern Mediterranean Sea, Turkey and examined for the presence of an anisakid nematode Hysterothylacium aduncum (Rudolphi) in the digestive tract. The parasites (fourth-stage larvae, L4s) were found in spiral valve (Infected samples, Ni: 88, TLi range: 31-127 cm) of common guitarfish.
In order to achieve sustainable fishing livelihoods in coastal communities, data on profitability of small-scale fisheries relative to fish species caught and gear types used by fishermen is required as part of a broader fisheries management strategy. This study was undertaken with this in mind. Interviews were conducted among 60 fishermen between February and March 2010. Economic assessment of small-scale fishing activities were done using questionnaires based on direct market pricing and contingent valuation methods. The results indicate that highly profitable fish species include Epinephelus aeneus, Sparus caeruleostictus, Dentex angolensis and Lutjanus goreensis valued at US$2.97, US$2.87, US$2.85 and US$2.63 per kilogram respectively. The less profitable species include Dasyatis margarita, Caranx crysos and Sardinella aurita valued at US$0.34, US$0.66 and US$ 0.85 per kilogram respectively. Although Sardinella aurita was among the less valuable fish species, it was the main species driving profits for the fishermen due to its high share volume among the fish catches. Findings from this study suggest high rates of exploitation, in that stocks generally cannot provide for increased economic return in the face of increased investment. This is a clear indicator that the open-access nature of Ghanaian fisheries is not sustainable, and management reform is well overdue.
This meeting, the second national Fisheries Governance Dialogue, aimed to help stakeholders in the fisheries sector generate a shared understanding of critical lessons and pathways for fisheries co-management success in Ghana. This was a direct response to the call from both fisheries communities and the government of Ghana for a radical change from the way fisheries resources are currently being managed. Indeed, the justification for such a gathering for dialogue was appropriately summed up by the Deputy Minister for Food and Agriculture in Charge of Fisheries, Hon. Nii Amasa Namoale, in many of his opening remarks, such as the following: “The Government recognizes the urgent need to change the way the country is managing fisheries. While in the past anyone was allowed to purchase a boat and fish, this is no longer the reality of the industry and there is a need to address the issue of open access ...” “The Government recognizes the importance of engaging stakeholders in the process of developing a system for implementing community-based fisheries management in Ghana ...” “The Government is convinced that this dialogue would create conditions for practitioners to share traditional and scientific knowledge in governance and come up with appropriate systems for the future of Ghana’s coastal fisheries.” The meeting was attended by 60 men and women from stakeholder organizations and communities, and commenced with presentations on co-management experiences from local, regional and international participants. This was followed by panel discussions to extract lessons that specifically related to successfully implementing co-management in Ghana’s fisheries. Finally, breakout groups addressed in greater detail some issues of importance to fisheries governance reform in Ghana. While fisheries co-management is not a new concept in Ghana, participants heard that previous attempts to initiate these systems proved unsustainable. A number of lessons were drawn from these past experiences, including the following: • Co-management initiatives are not sustainable based on voluntary input only; they must be financially supported initially and provided with revenue-raising means to become self-financing in the long run. • Creating new institutions without carefully planning how they will relate to existing institutions is likely to result in conflict. • Common characteristics of co-management institutions showing sustainability included: strong leadership organizing regular meetings; focused co-management plans; determination and team work; honesty and transparency; mutual respect among members; effective monitoring and supervision; and provision of skills training. • The gazetting of district bylaws to provide legislative support for co-management proved a long and drawn-out process, and was a disincentive for sustained effort by groups. Regional and global lessons from several decades of active co-management across diverse natural resources should be incorporated into system design in Ghana and include the following: • Global experience has repeatedly shown that for small-scale, multi-gear fisheries, top-down centralized management does not work; co-management, involving key stakeholders in the management process, is the only way forward. • Successful co-management can provide sustainable, productive resource use; low levels of conflict; secure livelihoods (including alternate livelihoods); and flourishing coastal communities. • In designing co-management systems, it is important that local context, including institutions, species/ecosystems and government systems are considered. • Local perceptions of equity/fairness must be understood and equitable representation in co management systems mandated. • The perceived gains from co-management must outweigh the costs of involvement. • The involvement of stakeholders in decision-making processes through communication pathways facilitated by co-management systems leads to greater perceived legitimacy of regulations in the eyes of resource users, and can increase voluntary compliance rates considerably. • The involvement of co-management groups in livelihood and community development actions provides a strong incentive for participation and builds group cohesion. These actions can offset the ‘costs’ of a shift to managed access. • Regional study tours (west and east Africa) involving community members showed participants successful examples of where development of alternative livelihoods, women’s co-operatives, improved fish handling and processing systems, tourism ventures, and vessel registration systems had contributed to improved wellbeing of fishing communities. • There must be explicit maritime jurisdictions/authorities at each scale and systems must be supported by a solid legal foundation.
The Third National Fisheries Governance Dialogue was a direct follow up on the Second National Fisheries Governance Dialogue held in Elmina in April 2012. It was agreed at the Second dialogue that co-management was the way forward for sustaining Ghana’s fisheries and that its success would depend on a supportive legal framework (Mills et al., 2012). A mandate for co-management was shared by the recently appointed Minister of Fisheries and Aquaculture Development, Honorable Nayon Bilijo. The Hon. Minister’s keynote address at the Third Dialogue affirmed that co-management would help address some of the challenges faced by the fisheries sector in Ghana. He promised to bring on board his experience in implementing co-management in Ghana’s forestry sector. Although stakeholders agreed on reforms towards co-management, issues concerning a co-management structure and whether the existing legal framework supported co-management or not were not clear after the Second Dialogue. Thus, prior to the Third Dialogue a consultation process was initiated to: • facilitate discussions with key stakeholders for ideas and inputs on Ghana’s co-management structure • conduct a policy analysis to determine whether Ghana’s fisheries laws supported co-management. The Third Fisheries Dialogue aimed to: • inform stakeholders of the outcomes from the stakeholder consultation process, • inform stakeholders on outcomes of the policy analysis, and the steps required to move towards a supportive legal environment for co-management, and • provide a forum for discussions of ideas that could feed into the development of a co-management structure and legal framework for Ghana. The two-day meeting was attended by 79 fisheries stakeholders representing government, donor agencies, research institutes, fisher folks, non-governmental organisations and civil society organizations (see Annex 1). The meeting began with four key presentations on: status of fisheries in Ghana; co-management (what it is and what it entails); outcomes of stakeholder consultations for co-management structure; and outcomes of the policy research on the legal framework. These were followed by four breakout groups that discussed the potential co-management structures for four different fisheries: pelagics, demersals, freshwater (Volta Lake), lagoons and estuaries (see Annex 2 for the detailed workshop programme). In another session participants played a fishing simulation game that aimed to demonstrate the consequences of an open access fisheries management system and the impacts of different forms of managed access. Key messages from the Dialogue include: • Fisheries management in Ghana is currently centralized, and this poses challenges for co-management. Depending on the type of fisheries, some major fisheries management tasks and responsibilities need to be decentralized. Authority will need to be maintained at the national level for the management of pelagics, but some authority could be devolved to lower levels of management (e.g., regions, district and communities) depending on the nature of the fisheries. • There should not be a ‘one-size-fits-all’ structure for co-management as this, in most cases, does not work. Co-management structures will therefore differ with the 2 biology/ecology and social structure of a fishery. It was generally agreed that there was need for three key structures: o National-level management for pelagic fisheries. Laws will be developed to manage pelagic fish at the national level since they are highly migratory and cross regional and national boundaries. Management will also need to involve enforcement agencies (e.g. Marine Police and Navy). o Regional-level management of near shore demersal species and the Volta Lake. Management authority should be devolved to the regions with full authority to approve management plans for fisheries resources in their areas. For rule making, two options were discussed: rules to be made at national level and implemented at regional level; and rules to be made at the regional level and approved/enacted at the national level. The Volta Lake was included under the regional level co-management structure as it crosses many regions. o Local management of lagoons and estuaries and small freshwater lakes. Management and rule making powers devolved to local communities – and the rules made to be passed as by-laws by district assemblies. • Although the existing fisheries policy supports co-management, there are no legal instruments for operationalising co-management in Ghana. The existing fisheries legislative instruments (LI) do not clearly specify how co-management should be implemented. • Although some aspects of co-management can be implemented under the existing legal framework, others will require amendments to the Fisheries and Local Government Acts and their LI. For example, under the existing legislation there is provision for setting up advisory groups for fisheries management – however, they only have advisory powers with no decision making powers. Also, because fisheries law making is centralized, districts, regions or communities will not be able to formulate and enforce fisheries management by-laws under the existing law. • The fisheries laws as they are, do not directly link up with other relevant laws, e.g. the Local Government Act. The way forward The following actions were identified as crucial by participants: • some fisheries management activities should be decentralized, depending on the social and ecological characteristic of the fisheries. There is need to critically think about which of the fisheries should be decentralized (e.g., artisanal vs. industrial). • The fisheries laws must be linked up with other existing laws such as the Local Government Act. • the current Fisheries Act must be amended and a new legislative instrument for co-management should be developed. • A fisheries co-management working group should be formed at national level. A suggestion was made for the Fisheries Commission to take a leading role in organizing and facilitating the activities of this group. The working group could meet regularly to discuss co-management issues for Ghana. • The outputs from the dialogue should serve as a base for a consolidated co-management structure for Ghana. The Hεn Mpoano Initiative was tasked to: − lead the drafting of a Memorandum in collaboration with the Fisheries Commission and the Attorney-General’s Department for consideration by the Ministry of Fisheries and Aquaculture Development. This task will include developing the necessary drafting instructions for amendments to the Fisheries 3 Act and a new LI to implement the outcomes of the Third Fisheries Governance Dialogue. − summarize and publish the Dialogue outcomes in the press to inform the public, and − arrange through the Speaker of Parliament to meet with members of the Parliamentary Sub-committee on Subsidiary Legislation to update them on fisheries issues.
Fisheries Research
Closer to reality: Reconstructing total removals in mixed fisheries from Southern Europe2014 •
Fisheries Management and Ecology
Fisheries mismanagement in a Natura 2000 area in western Greece… document SC/62/SM10, …
An update on the catch composition and other aspects of cetacean exploitation in Ghana2010 •
FAO fisheries circular = FAO circulaire sur les pêches = FAO circular de pesca
Sampling protocol for the pilot collection of Catch, Effort and Biological data in Egypt. FAO EastMed Tech. Doc., 122007 •
Fisheries Research
Fisheries catch misreporting and its implications: The case of SenegalWest African Journal of Applied Ecology
Occurrence of macro-algae in the by-catch of Beach Seine Fisheries at Sakumono, Ghana2009 •
Acta Adriatica
Israel: Reconstructed estimates of total fisheries removals in the Mediterranean, 1950–20102013 •
Fish and Fisheries
Marine social-ecological responses to environmental change and the impacts of globalization2011 •
IDS Working Papers
Political Economy of Climate Compatible Development: Artisanal Fisheries and Climate Change in Ghana2014 •
2014 •