Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
…
3 pages
1 file
Comparing the words of Jesus from “The Secret Book of John” in the Nag Hammadi Library to the words of Arius from “Thalia”
Hugoye: Journal of Syriac Studies 26.2 (2023): 467-532, 2023
A how-to-do study applying the method of new philology on a 4th–5th century codex: Its production, its structuring of inscribed text, and its overall content in relation to the contemporary context, where the codex is presented as an apocryphal book of John the Apostle.
Fourth R, 2023
Deborah Saxon’s interview with author Shirley Paulson draws attention to the significance of extra-canonical writings. Her own discovery and journey with the vast amount of writings beyond the Bible from antiquity inspired her to re-think her relationship to a canonical set of writings. They provide historical and social context for the writings within the Bible and give important background to the contentious subject of heresiology. Elaine Pagels, Michael Williams, and Karen King exposed the weakness in the polemic arguments against Gnosticism, consequently opening the door for greater study and appreciation for such texts as the Secret Revelation of John. This text became the foundation for Paulson’s further exploration in Nag Hammadi writings as well as a larger apocryphal set of writings.
The books of the New Testament Apocrypha (NTA) are currently postulated to have been authored continuously by Christians ‘out of love for the authors and/or books’ of the New Testament Canon (NTC) across the 2nd, 3rd, 4th and perhaps 5th centuries. It is argued that the core series of books of the NTA was largely authored as a political reaction to the “Constantine Codex” between the years of 325 and 336 CE by a non-Christian - Arius of Alexandria. Constantine is sketched as a supreme imperial fascist. Arius is sketched as a Greek Gnostic priest, perhaps one of the therapeutae of Asclepius, whose temples and shrines Constantine had utterly destroyed c.324 CE. Arius as an anti-Christian satirist was so good at his business that the preservation of his books was not only prohibited by the death penalty but was reinforced by Constantine’s pronouncement of “damnatio memoriae” both upon his name and his living memory. Later Christian heresiologists harmonized Arius’ utterly controversial satirical literary reception to Constantine’s NTC and fabricated a “twisted” Hollywood history in which the academic Greek priest appears as one of the cast of “Constantine’s many readily available Christian Bishops”. Arius’ dogmatic sophisms such as “Jesus was made from nothing existing” suggest that the 4th century Arian controversy was not over the theology of Jesus but over the historicity of Jesus.
Since their aeditio princeps by Agnes Smith Lewis in 1899, the Palestinian Lectionaries, and some fragmentary gospels collections also in Galilean Aramaic, have been largely ignored. A few scholars (such as, recently, Bruce Metzger and Sebastian Brock) have glanced at them but largely dismissed them as Caesarian texts lacking in importance. This essay suggests that their Gospel of John is as close as we can get today to the original monograph that was on display in Ephesus for several centuries, and concludes with an especially interesting variant pericope.
Apocrypha, 2018
Reviews of Biblical and Early Christian Studies, 2012
Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism, 2020
The resolution to the apparently synonymous usage of the φιλία/φιλέω and ἀγάπη/ἀγαπάω word clusters in the Gospel of John lies in the Aristotelian discourse about ‘friendship’, as the author of the Gospel sees it intersect with the Christ-event. The Gospel author coordinates the Hellenistic preference for φιλέω and Jewish-Christian preference for ἀγαπάω as the highest forms of love, yet revises Aristotelian φιλία by subsuming it under Christian ἀγάπη, by dissolving Aristotle’s view of unequal friendships and by reconfiguring divinization as the greatest good one should desire for a friend, against Aristotle’s own view. The two terms are rendered fully synonymous by the Gospel’s conclusion, but especially in light of the death and resurrection— the divinization of Jesus— and in the discourse between Peter and Jesus in John 21, thereby bringing together Athens and Jerusalem.
Revista Catalana De Teologia, 2013
L'Evangeli de Joan és una font important per a reconstruir les circumstàncies de la vida i la mort de Jesús. Aquest Evangeli és un document de la tradició de Jesús que combina la fe en Crist amb un interès teològic en la seva vida i la seva mort, en la seva predicació i en la seva pregària, el seu poder i la seva passió. L'Evangeli de Joan és també un llibre amb una història i un discurs que necessita lectors inspirats per a entendre la veritat de Jesús i el missatge d'amor de Déu. El camí per a reconstruir l'anomenat «Jesús històric» va des dels sinòptics, que donen la informació i orientació bàsiques, fins a Joan, que il•lustra amb els colors de Jesús el fons sobre el qual l'evangeli de Jesús s'ha d'explicar i llegir com a evangeli de Déu.
Méthexis, 1993
Eikon / Imago
Kitab al-Masalik wa l-rnamalik by Abu Islhaq al-I~ta""''LA ........... i Viae regnorum: descriptio ditionis Moslemicae / auctore Abu Ishak al-Farisi al-Istakhri. M.J. de Goeje's Classic Edition (1870)
Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 2012
Plurilinguisme / Observatoire européen du plurilinguisme, 2020
Observador del conocimiento Vol. 5 Nº 3 septiembre, 2020
JATI EMAS (Jurnal Aplikasi Teknik dan Pengabdian Masyarakat), 2021
Obesity surgery, 2009
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 2013
Revue Théolgique Shalom
redalyc.uaemex.mx
Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2019