Science, Patriotism, and Mother Veda: Ritual Activism in Maharashtra

Science, Patriotism, and Mother Veda: Ritual Activism in Maharashtra Author(s): Timothy Lubin Source: International Journal of Hindu Studies, Vol. 5, No. 3 (Dec., 2001), pp. 297-321 Published by: Springer Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20106779 Accessed: 10/03/2010 05:16 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=springer. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. Springer is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to International Journal of Hindu Studies. http://www.jstor.org  Science, patriotism, and Mother Veda: Ritual activism inMaharashtra Timothy Lubin About a decade ago, 1 found myself watching seventeen priests in an enclosure, enacting a month-long sequence of rites first described nearly three thousand years ago. Around me sat a crowd of local farmers and townspeople who had never seen such a performance before but who had each made a small donation to attend. During lulls in the ritual action, the organizer and other svam?s (holy men) preached about the meaning and value of the ritual and connected it with better-known devotional traditions in the region and with the principles of science. Attendees circumambulated the enclosure and deposited offerings before pictures of holy men, both legendary and modern. The entire arena was filled with explanatory labels and diagrams, augmented by a display of educational posters. This event seemed to crystallize aspects of the debate about what role Br?hmanical traditions can play in contemporary India.1 Over the last two centuries, Hindus have sought to come to terms with Western assumptions about what constitutes religion in the modern world. Early observers considered India benighted in its preoccupation with 'idolatry' and arcane priestly ritual, brutal in its myths of bloodthirsty goddesses and village sacrifices, and medieval in its superstition. These criticisms reflected a broadly Protestant ethos that had earlierrejected the allegedly excessive ritualism of the Roman Catholic church and declared the victory of reason over dogma. In the wake of this critique, English-educated Hindu elites developed a variety of forms of 'ethnic nationalism' (as Anthony Smith [1983, 1998] has defined it): The construction of an idealized Golden that embodies the 'essential' Age features of the indigenous culture as well as those features of the dominant alien (especially colonialist) culture that are deemed to make it 'modern' (and thus powerful and successful). Christophe Jaffrelot (1996), following John Plamenatz (1973), points particu International Journal of Hindu Studies 5, 3 (December 2001): 297-321 ? 2003 by theWorld Heritage Press Inc. 298 / Timothy Lubin larly to the ambivalence implicit in this program: that of asserting native cultural superiority while appropriating the perceived strengths of the alien power. The foreign culture is stigmatized but also emulated (either surreptitiously or unconsciously). With regard to religion, this means producing a version of Hindu tradition lives up to 'modern' (namely, Western that and Protestant) standards of legitimacy: that a religion is defined by a monotheistic creed embodied in a common scripture; that it should minimize priestly authority and rationalize itsmode of worship; that it should reject 'superstition' and 'barbaric' practices; that it should be in accord with reason. Religious reform societies that were this period (the Br?hmo started during Sam?j, ?rya Sam?j, and Pr?rthan? Sam?j) sought to rectify these defects by recovering the pristine form of a universal 'Hindu,' 'Vedic,' or 'Aryan' spiri tuality, distilling it into a simple creed, and preaching and printing pamphlets after the fashion of the Christian missionaries. A deity defined abstractly in Ved?ntic terms was meant to subsume and replace the personal deities, fierce deities were softened, and a spiritualized interpretation of customary practices came to prevail. In Ceylon, the inspiration for an analogous transformation (dubbed 'Protestant Buddhism') can be identified as Henry Steel Olcott and his disciple, Anag?rika Dharmap?la: an abstractly stated Buddhist catechism replaced J?taka stories as themedium of instruction and an intellectualized view of the Buddha came to prevail. Such projects have been entwined with the construction of new social and political identities. It was the intellectual elites and the middle classes who a modern took an interest in these movements; they thereby claimed to define 'Hinduism' that could be India's answer to Christianity. Meanwhile, villagers and the less educated and the less prosperous in the cities carried on with traditional forms of devotion; thus the adoptionof modernist religious perspec tives and practices became a mark of rising status. Now, just as the edifice of 'liberal,' 'reformed' religion (both Christian and Jewish) is being challenged by an upsurge of Neo-Orthodox and charismatic movements in theWest, India may be witnessing some analogous developments. One of these developments srauta ritual.2 By this I mean is a revival of Vedic something different from the revival of a spiritualized idea of 'Vedic religion' (or 'Vedic Dharma') and different also from the more or less sustained Vedic practice found in isolated communities outside the mainstream of Hindu the ?rya religiosity. The former was given its early definition by groups like in turn took their cue from the common Sam?j and Br?hmo Sam?j, which nineteenth-century Indological tendency to elevate the Vedic literature as both the foundation and the highest expression of Hindu culture. Hindu intellectuals of the period came to see image worship and village exorcists from the British  Ritual activism inMaharashtra I 299 point of view as crude and 'superstitious.' From his founding of the ?rya Sam?j in 1875, Day?nanda Sarasvat? called for a return to Vedic ritual practice in place of the worship of images. But the 'Vedic' envisioned was highly practice idealized and shorn of most of the priestly ritual, which many Indologists had cited as the beginning of India's subjection to the obscurantism of the Br?hmana priests. This type of Vedism is still active today, not least in the ?rya Sam?j itself (although, as I shall suggest below, the Sam?j has somewhat modified its views on the subject of ritual). The other way in which Vedic religion has been present in India is as a tenacious traditionalism found in scattered, small communities, mostly in the south. These are Br?hmana communities, generally settled and still living in agrah?ras, lands donated to them in previous centuries by local rulers. Several of these communities appear to have maintained the transmission of Vedic texts orally by rote from teacher to pupil (often from father to son) as well as the techniques of applying those texts ritually in Vedic yaj?as (sacrificial rites).3 Although there have been changes in the character of this Vedic practice over three millennia (see Kashikar and Parp?la 1983), one can say that these isolated Br?hmana communities have carried on the Vedic tradition out of a strong sense of pride and collective conviction and that they have done so despite the paucity of wealthy patrons in the contemporary world. Their practice is basically private, and many have gone so far as to seal the walls of their ritual halls (which, according to the ritual codes, are supposed to have gaps) in order to avoid interference from outsiders during offerings that call for animals to be killed.4 There is no effort to generate public interest in the practice or to recruit people outside the immediate community to participate. There is also no systematic effort to formulate a role for vaidika practice in society generally, aside from repeating the traditional claim that yaj?a reinforces the order of the universe. Hence, one cannot call such practice revivalistic, even if, in some respects or on some occasions, certain rites or recitations need to be relearned on the basis of printed or manuscript texts. By the revivalist phenomenon contrast, that 1 wish to address here is not entirely new, perhaps, but appears to be a growing trend, even if on a relatively small scale. It is an attempt to reestablish Vedic srauta ritual in its full complexity as a regular feature of modern Indian life. Vedic revivalists of this type tap both the other forms of contemporary Vedism characterized above: They use ?rya Sam?j-style arguments for the spiritual and social value of Vedic practice and draw (of necessity) on the expertise of traditionalist Vaidika Br?hmanas from the rural agrah?ras. Revivalism differs from both of these other forms of Vedism by the impulse to simplify and intellec (i) resisting tualize the ritual practice to encourage wider participation and (ii) bringing the  300 / Timothy Lubin Vedic ritual out of the private family or agrah?ra setting and projecting it as a public, civic undertaking explicitly aimed at the common good. My examples here will be the activities of a few Maharashtrian sv?mis, especially those of Ranganath Krishna Selukar. Similar cases can be found in other parts of India, and reports of 'Vedic yaj?as' (a few of which might fairly be termed srauta) run periodically in the newspapers. However, I hope that by contextualizing one regional manifestation as fully as possible, we a may be in position to say what is new in this enterprise and to account for the success it has had. SELUKAR AND MAHARASHTRIAN SRAUTA PRACTICE Selukar is based inGangakhed, a small town in eastern Maharashtra. His father, Krishna Dikshit Selukar(1879-1967), had studied two Vedas and taken an interest in srauta ritual, performing a soma yaj?a in 1932. Before he died, he made his son promise to become an ?hit?gni, 'one who has established the [three] ritual fires.' The use of three fires is precisely what distinguishes srauta ritual from ordinary 'domestic' (grhya) Vedic ritual. This status brings with it a great deal of new responsibilities and restrictions, notably the requirement to perform complex rites every day in the morning and evening, at both the full and new moon, thrice yearly at regular intervals, and so forth. In 1966, Selukar began offering the simpler single-fire grhya rites, with a major performance once a year; in 1972, he fulfilled his promise to his father, to consecrate himself to the life of an ?hit?gni, by performing his first srauta agnihotra (the twice-daily milk offering) at Tryambakeshvar, at the source of the holy God?vari River. Since then, for three decades, he has been performing a series of rites of increasing complexity and length according to a standard hierarchy.5 In 1992,1 attended his aindrasapt?ha-soma-yajna, in which the sacred soma juice is pressed and offered into the fire on seven consecutive days, the climax of a full month of ceremonies. Selukar does not have the means to pay for such costly undertakings, but he is able to collect funds in the form of donations, and during the ceremonies, visitors make offerings. In this way, since 1980, he has been performing a soma sacrifice almost every year, and, each year since 1985, the version performed has been one-pressing-day soma longer than the last. Mostly these have taken place in Selukar's native Maharashtra, but he has made some effort to give the project a pan-Indian scope by holding sacrifices in Delhi (1993, 1996) and in the famous pilgrimage town of Hardwar (1998). From April 26, 1999, to May 17, 2000, in Gangakhed, he performed the ritual that marks the apex of his ritual career: the year-long gav?mayana sattra.  Ritual activism inMaharashtra I 301 From his first agnihotra until the end of the 1970s, he performed only istis* (mostly c?turm?syas) because he was loath to perform rites that involved the slaughter and offering of an animal. The turning point came in 1978, when Selukar attended a soma sacrifice in Solapur sponsored by Mahadev Vishnu Apte, a disciple of Gajanan Maharaj of Akkalkot; also in attendance were Yudhishthir Mimamsak (an ?rya Sam?jist and the preeminent editor of Day?nanda's works)7 and T. N. Dharmadhikari of Vaidika Samsodhana M?ndala, Pune.8 The chief priest at this performance was Aravattur Sitaram Vishvanatha Shrauti of Nellore (originally from Tamilnadu). Vishvanatha (1921-97) and his three brothers were trained both in Yajur Veda (including priestly duties the of adhvaryu class) and in Sama Veda. Although his biographer firmly asserts that the family had sometimes used pista-pasu (dough figurines substituted for live animal victims) in their performances in earlier generations, including a 1920 rite performed at Petlad in Gujarat, he also notes that when Vishvanatha was engaged by Gajanan Maharaj to perform an agnistoma sacrifice in 1969 for one of his disciples, the Maharaj had to cajole him into consenting to use pots of gh? (ghrta- or ?jya-pasu) in place of animals: As Shri A.S.V. [Vishvanatha] was hesitant in the beginning to perform ?jya pasu in spite of the tradition of pishta pasu in the family, Shri Gajanana Maharaj reassured him that the responsibility of any lapse due to Aajya pasu will be owned by Shri Maharaj himself ...This tradition of Aajya pasu was followed by Shri A.S.V. thereafter (Anonymous 2000: 203). Later Vishvanatha so far as to publish pamphlets in four languages (includ went ing Sanskrit) condemning the use of animal victims and citing passages from the Vedas and the ritual codes to support the substitution of other substances.9 After witnessing the 1978 ritual, Selukar approached Vishvanatha about performing the same rite for him as well. Thus began the partnership between them that continued until Vishvanatha's death. His son, Bharga Ganapati, and his grandsons, Bhattaram Jagadisha and Bhattaram Shrinivasa, who trained under him, have participated in all of Selukar's rituals. Shrinivasa served as adhvaryu at Selukar's sattra, thus fulfilling Vishvanatha's vow, a vow he had made shortly before his death. THE DATT?TREYA CONNECTION We find in Selukar's enterprise, and in the Maharashtrian Vedic revival more 302 / Timothy Lubin broadly, a triangle of elements: Vedic ritual, Vaisnava holy men, and the ?rya Sam?j. One linking factor here might be the tradition of devotion to Datt?treya. Datta is a legendary ascetic of the extreme avadh?taHi variety: he is deemed an avat?ra of Visnu, along with portions of Siva and Brahm?. Datta traditions may originally have come to Maharashtra with the N?tha yogis, who included him in their lists of teachers, but the earliest textual references to Datta are found in the works of the Mah?nubhavas(Rigopoulos 1998: 57-108)." There is a certain irony in the fact that the Mah?nubhavas were mostly of low caste and were fiercely critical of Br?hmana ritual authority and orthodoxy; yet in the Maharashtrian Datta samprad?ya, Datta becomes a voice of orthodoxy and Br?hmana authority. The foundational text for the samprad?ya is the Gurucaritra of Gaiig?dhara Sarasvat?, written in the middle of the sixteenth century inMarathi. This work presents hagiographies of two men viewed as historical avat?ras of Datta: Srip?da Srivallabha (ca. 1323-53) and Nrsimha Sarasvat? (ca. 1378-1458). Both men are presented as the offspring of orthoprax Br?hmana families (of the ?pastamba and V?jasaneyin branches, respectively), fabulously precocious in their knowledge of Veda and in their spiritual develop ment. Special attention is given to the importance of Br?hmanical rituals such as sr?ddha (offerings to the ancestors) and especially to the ritual of initiation into Veda study (maunj?-bandhana). Srip?da undergoes it at the age of seven; Nrsimha is initiated at eight, but up to that point he utters nothing but the sacred syllable om and, after the rite, spontaneously begins reciting all the Vedas and s?strasl Both men renounce worldly life at an early age, visit many to Datta. Through their blessings, a pilgrimage sites, and propagate devotion barren buffalo gives milk and a low-caste man is able to recite the Vedas miracles are meant to impress (interestingly parallel feats). Several of Nrsimha's Muslim rulers of the Bahaman?, eAdilsh?h?, and Qutbshah? Sultanates in the Deccan. (1762), a compendium of hagiographies of bhakti Mah?pati's Bhaktavijaya saints, includes a chapter inwhich he collapses the two avat?ras into the single person of Nrsimha Sarasvat? and particularly emphasizes the saint's Br?hmanical orthodoxy. Nrsimha is said to have preached strict observance of varn?srama dharma and the importance of reciting Veda and performing yaj?as. This is the aspect of Nrsimha's character that modern Maharashtrian scholars have empha sized as well, making Nrsimha an early proponent of 'Maharashtrian Dharma' and of Hindu activism to combat the deleterious effects of foreign, Islamic rule on Hindu (and especially Br?hmanical) piety (thus Kulkarnee 1989: 203; Tulpule 1979: 352; see also Sardar 1969: 143-49). It is bit odd that Datta, the paradigmatic avadh?ta, should be made, through a the medium of his avat?ras (also renouncers but not avadh?tas), to teach the  Ritual activism inMaharashtra I 303 value of householder ritual and the observance of social norms! If we accept this picture, as the Datta asks us to do, then Selukar's own mission samprad?ya begins to look perfectly consonant with his tradition. Gajanan Maharaj belongs to the Datta samprad?ya, and, as mentioned above, he has taken a strong interest in reviving the practice of srauta ritual (albeit with the substitution of gh?-an\ma\s for s?ks?t-pasu ['manifest animals']); many of these rites have been performed by two of his disciples, with Vishvanatha presiding. There have been a few ramifications of the Datta tradition that look to founders other than Nrsimha. Datta himself may remain somewhat in the background, but the themes of the Br?hmanical Datta tradition are strongly present. One branch, the Svariipa samprad?ya, which traces its guru parampar? back to Samartha Akkalkot Sv?m? and is currently led by one K?k? Mah?r?j, maintains a temple complex in Pune (the Sri Digambarad?sa Matha) with a Veda p?thas?l? in which boys, aged eight and older, learn to recite Vedic mantras under the direction of one Madhav Vyankateswar Paranjpe, who also served as maitr? varuna priest in Selukar's sattra.12 Selukar himself belongs to the ?nanda samprad?ya that is historically associated with four figures: Purn?nanda (author of the Avadh?tatik? on Datta, 1610), Sahaj?nanda (of Kalyani), Nij?nanda, and Nij?nanda's son and disciple, Rangan?tha.13 Selukar's literature focuses on Rangan?tha and associates him with R?mad?sa, Jayar?ma, ?nandam?rti, and Kesava as Visnu's pa?cayatana (fivefold abode). Although Datta appears top and center, above Selukar himself, in a montage of gurus at the front of the Satra-smaranam volume (Dharma dhikari, Ranade, Thite, and Kulkarni 2000), he is rarely mentioned in the text. An exception is the biography of Selukar's father, Krishna Dikshit, in which Datta makes a personal appearance: By the grace of the sadguru, even from childhood Sri Krsna Mah?r?j's daily routine was always to be continuously reciting the Sri Dattop?san? Bh?gavata, reciting and meditating on the Bhagavad G?ta, and so forth. Because of his father's old age, all the household responsibilities fell to him when he was fifteen years of age. But only for about five or six years did he remain in his house, seeing the value of his inheritance. A short time later, while taking darsan in the temple to Datta there in Aus?, he had a direct vision of Sr? Datta Mah?r?j. Datta gave him a manuscript of that blessed book, the Bh?gavata, and told him: 'Perform seven recitations of it, and your prior deeds will come to fruition.' Accordingly, sadguru Sri Krsna Mah?r?j remained there at sant Goriy? K?k?'s holy place, in the Mah?deva [Siva] temple at Karhi for three or four months without informing anyone at home, and recited the Bh?gavata through seven times. There he had a vision of 304 / Timothy Lubin Sankara [Siva] [telling him:] The banks of the Gang? (the God?vari riverbank) are a place of holy work (kannabh?mi).' After that he returned to the village. (The reader must note that we do not know to whom he gave this above-mentioned blessed book on account of his renunciatory disposition.) (Selukar 2000: 138).u Several points should be noted here. First, the depiction of Krishna Selukar as a puer senex, a child with an adult's is a common piety and maturity, hagiographical motif attested around the world, especially in accounts of future ascetics and monks. The same, of course, is true of the divine visions. In each case, the deity grants a vision to Selukar's father while he is in the god's temple. In the first vision, Datta hands down an actual manuscript (hastdikhit) of the Bh?gavata, the absence of which today is attributed to Selukar's renunciatory habit of giving things away! By following Datta's instructions, KrishnaSelukar wins a second vision, this time of Siva. Siva proclaims to him the sanctity of the God?vari riverbank as a 'ground for holy work.' The use of the name 'Gang?' to denote the God?vari, one of the main rivers of Maharashtra, is certainly meant to superimpose the Sanskrit literary fame of the river that waters the old Br?hmanical heartland, ?ry?varta, on this regionally beloved stream. As we shall see, the particular 'work' (karma) that he will perform there isVedic yaj?a, which is often referred to simply as karman in Sanskrit texts. From the age of twenty-seven, he began performing the sequence of rites 'on the banks of pure mother God?,' climaxing in a grand soma yaj?a: At that time, wise priests from K?s? [Varanasi] had come to [officiate at] the sacrifice. For seventeen days, a crowd of two hundred to three hundred thousand people were continuously being fed. Today, the crowd that had gone to that sacrifice tell [how] at that sacrifice the person of Sri Nijarahg? [Rangan?tha Sv?m?] was present in form for seventeen days, in the garb of a holy man, keeping silence (Selukar 2000: 139). This scenario vividly juxtaposes ascetic and householder values: Even as a married Krishna Selukar puts on a dramatic display of munificence and ritual patronage, the quasi-ascetic Rangan?tha appears miraculously to preside, austere and silent, over the whole affair. Years of 'continuous worship of Yaj?a N?r?yana [Visnu as Sacrificial Rite] on the banks of the God?vari' are capped with a pilgrimage to Varanasi on foot (Selukar 2000: 139), an ascetic feat that draws attention yet again to the Sanskrit scriptural (and thus pan-Indian) religious context of Selukar's piety. Further, the sanctity of the region is  Ritual activism inMaharashtra I 305 guaranteed by the repeated invocation of the primordial holy land. THE ?RYA SAM?J AND THE FIGHT FOR MAR?THV?D? Besides the various branches of the Datta samprad?ya, another key factor in the Maharashtrian revival is the ?rya Sam?j. Yudhishthir Mimamsak's attendance at Mahadev Vishnu Apte's1978 vegetarian yaj?a demonstrates the ?rya Sam?j's interest in encouraging srauta practice in the region. The Sam?j has remained deeply involved in Selukar's performances, too. They mount an informational to his display at each of his major rituals, and Sam?j ist preachers speak audiences on the value and meaning of the Veda. A portrait of Day?nanda is placed among those of others in Selukar's eclectic parampar? (including Datta, Parasur?ma, Sa?kara, and Rangan?tha). Members of the Sam?j are listed as advisors in his publications as well. This involvement reaffirms Day?nanda's conviction that India's return to greatness depends on a revival of Vedic Dharma (more precisely, on a revival of the synthesis of sacrificial ritualism and introspective asceticism canonized in the M?navadharmas?stra, about second century CE). Although he acknowledged the multiple priestly offices of the srauta system, Day?nanda (1971) himself seemed to regard the simpler 'domestic' (grhya) ritual as the model he wished to see universally adopted by the pure castes, thus emphasizing the homo (set of libations of butter fat accompanied by recitations of mantras) rather than the more complicated services of the three-fire (srauta, vait?nika) 'high' cult. Image-based worship, on the other hand, represented to him everything that was wrong with Hindu piety. There is another factor that should be taken into account in assessing the significance of the ?rya presence in Gangakhed and in all Selukar's perform ances: In this region, the Sam?j has had a prominent role in confronting Muslims with Hindu cultural dominance, attempting to convert Muslims 'back' a to Hindu identity, and forestalling potential conversions of low-caste groups to Islam or Christianity by 'purifying' members of castes deemed impure according to the classical varn?sramadharma. For these purposes, the Sam?j developed a rite of conversion called suddhi ('purification'), employed by staff missionaries to reaffirm the Hindu identity of individuals and, later, of groups who had earlier converted to Islam or Christianity; the rite was then extended to any Indian Muslims or Christians and to Dalits (to render them 'pure' Hindus). This practice constituted a deliberate challenge to other religious communities 306 / Timothy Lubin and generated opposition among other Hindus as well (Jones 1989: 100-101, 195-98).15 When, in 1921, Muslims in Kerala reacted toMohandas K. Gandhi's first noncooperation campaign by destroying Hindu temples and forcing Hindus to convert, the Samaj not only sent missionaries to perform suddhi but also provided aid to rebuild Hindu temples. The desire to consolidate a unified Hindu bloc amid the tensions between Hindus and Muslims in the decades preceding independence thus gave the Sam?j a new tolerance for image worship (Jones 1989: 194-95). Gangakhed is part of Mar?thv?d?, the Marathi-language region that belonged, from the late eighteenth century, to the territories of the Niz?m of Hyderabad, a longtime Muslim rival of the Br?hmana Pesv?s of Pune. The ?rya Sam?j, as early as 1939, organized a saty?graha (civil disobedience) against the Nizam's government that led to mass arrests of activists. When, in 1947, the Niz?m refused to cede his lands to independent India as the other princely rulers had done, the ?rya Sam?j, led by R?m?nanda T?rtha, openly protested, promoting the public singing of the new Indian anthem, 'Jana Gana Mana.' The Niz?m's rebellious state did not fall until Indian forces marched on Hyderabad in 1948. Later, in 1983 and 1984, the Sam?j appears to have had a hand in the rioting sparked by Ganapati processions through Muslim areas of the city. Tension surrounding Ganapati processions is also attested in the period of the Niz?m.16 Gangakhed itself has not been spared; disturbances occurred there during the 1994 Ganapati festival season. Selukar's enterprise follows in the wake of the Sam?j's mission but magnifies the ritual dimension. Rather than settling for the relatively simple homa, he calls for people to embrace the full panoply of rites: to make srauta practice a way of life or else to support those who do. Each major performance includes an occasion for initiating groups of boys into traditional Veda study that can now be conducted at his school in Gangakhed. Selukar does not openly employ the confrontational approach of the Sam?j, nor does he dwell on the threat widely said to be posed by Muslims or Christians in India today. But he does echo much of the common rhetoric of the Hindu nationalist camp, including the use of V. D. Savarkar's (1969) term hindutva (literally Hinduness). Independence alone was not enough to bring about cultural renewal. A 'united Hindu nation' (sambaddh himdur?stra) can be brought about 'only when society lives within the bounds of theMother Veda's Dharma' (Selukar 2000: 138). Selukar's work to be seen precisely as religious and social, not is meant political. He is said to have become disgusted with public life after independ ence and to have 'renounced politics' (r?jk?ran sany?s ghetl?) (Selukar 1992: [30]), just as the samnyas? renounces earthly ambitions for the sake of spiritual perfection. The self-disciplined Vedic sacrificer, he says, performs his offerings  Ritual activism inMaharashtra I 307 publicly, vso that the institution of sacrifice might be revived' (Selukar 1992: [29]) and, with it, the nation itself. Hindu nationalists since the last century have argued that India must overcome its effeminate passivity, the result of long being subject to foreign domination: by the Muslims, by the British, and (so one hears today) by the undue influence of the Muslim minority. Selukar's literature appeals to this assumption, albeit in a muted manner, when it affirms that Vedic ritual evokes divine grace and removes 'weakness of heart' (Selukar 2000: 138). The biography of Selukar provides him with 'freedom-fighter' credentials: anecdotes are told of his skill as a wrestler and bodybuilder, his activities in the underground during the time of the Niz?m, and his defiance of and thrilling escape from the Raz?k?rs.17 Similarly, his publications present the Mar?th? warrior-king ?iv?j? as the embodiment of Vedic 'values,' while his nemesis, Awrangz?b, belongs to 'the demons,' in the thrall of the senses and the passions. Yet, in person, Selukar any caste prejudice or anti-Muslim denies dogma (conversations, Gangakhed, February and March 1992; interview, Pune, 22 July 1998). He insists that his p?thas?l? is open to anyone with the will and ability to study Veda; in practice this means Br?hmanas, and such schools are seen as a valuable resource for poor Br?hmanas. More persuasive is the fact that he has had a noted Muslim sitarist, Usman Khan of Pune, perform at two of his sacrifices, going so far as to embrace him on stage and declare him a 'Br?hmana' in spirit. Khan affirms Selukar's sincerity in this regard and was touched by the gesture (interview, Pune, 15 September 1988). YAJ?A AS TRADITIONAL VALUES In the Selukariteliterature, one reads repeatedly of Vedic 'culture' or 'values' (samsk?r). By this ismeant a learned respect for the importance of dedication to Vedic practice and all that it stands for in this context: For two dozen years, his father, the learned Ekn?tha, had studied two Vedas in Kas? itself. For this reason, sadguru Krsna Maul?'s childhood was passed in the bosom of Mother Veda. His family was born to great wealth, but on account of their pure, dispassionate nature, his mother and father spent all their time in the work of reciting Vedic mantras, sacrificing, pilgrimage, and the like. Consequently, the good values of Mother Veda were firmly instilled in Sri Krsna Maul?. Who but a fallen yogi would be born in such a supremely pure family! (Selukar 2000: 138-39).18 308 / Timothy Lubin The ethos of the Bhagavad G?ta is evident here: Krishna Selukar's parents are 'in the world,' but they do not crave the world's material rewards; they maintain the ascetic's equanimity in the face of pleasures and sorrows. They give freely of their wealth. Recall that Krsna would simply give away the miraculous manuscript he received from Datta 'on account of his renunciatory disposition' (ty?mcy? ty?gi vrttimulem). When he in turn marries, he does it only 'in accordance with his mother's wish,' out of duty (Selukar 2000: 138), not out of desire for the pleasures of married life. Indeed, the newlyweds 'very early abandoned riches' (Selukar 2000: 138). Ranganath Selukar's life their household mirrors 'The divine values of his mother's renunciatory life, of that of his father. rigorous dispassion and extreme self-control' took root in him (Selukar 1992: [29]). He exhibited his father's compassion and altruism, opening his doors to the unfortunate and giving away the clothes off his back. These anecdotes exemplify the three principles that Selukar derives from the practice of Vedic ritual itself A fairly standard presentation of these principles (in Marathi or Hindi) is included in most his publications. A representative example is the following: Nowadays there is a market in arbitrary, non-Vedic sacrifices that are beginning to appear everywhere. For this reason, for the sake of supporting human society, we are forgetting the true Vedic sacrifices that were set forth on a scientific basis [that is, as an adjunct to science]. The business of sacrifice is not merely to burn gh? and grains like sesame; rather the meaning of sacrifice is worship of the gods, organization, and giving (renouncing), for the sake of supporting society?for instance, indicating values. 1.Worship of the gods (devp?j?): Worship of the gods is service?showing hospitality and honor?to the powers (deities) who illumine all and to the ideal, great men who give divine inspiration to human society. 2. Organizing (samghatan): Organizing is to organize good people who would work for progress in human society. 3. Giving (d?n): We ourselves are not masters of any kind of wealth; giving, on the contrary, is expending such wealth in the common interest, in order to maintain balance in the social, national economy. We are entrusted with that wealth, and we are responsible members of the national economy. Hence the inevitable greatness of giving. Giving also means renouncing (ty?g). Giving on account of lofty duty is renouncing (Anonymous nd: 4). Let us examine these claims. To begin with the latter ones, there is no doubt  Ritual activism inMaharashtra / 309 that Vedic ritual, famous for its complexity and multiple priestly roles, is a good exercise in organization and cooperation. Selukar would like to insist that the organization that goes into running a sacrificial ritual can be transferred to society at large. Second, Vedic rituals do, indeed, call for giving: the oblations themselves are offered to the gods and then shared in the context of the ceremo nies; afterwards, gifts are distributed to the priests and perhaps to other deserving recipients. In the classical model, all of these gifts are given by the yajam?na, the sponsor, who bears all the costs of the ritual and stands personally to reap any benefits. In the case of the oblation, the sponsor must make a formal oath of renouncing (ty?ga) the substance. Yet it is not clear how this ritualized giving brings about a public ethic of disinterested generosity. However, in Selukar's rites, in which he is the official yajam?na, the general populace not only has the opportunity but is actively encouraged to contribute to the sacrificial enterprise through small donations. According to a p?j?-based interpretation of the ritual, all donors jointly share in the merit of and in the rewards of God's offering grace, which take tangible form in the mah?pras?da, the food served daily to all in attendance. Insofar as the enterprise itself is supposed to be for the public good, this might be seen as realizing the third premise. The first principle, however, is the most interesting. On the one hand, Selukar clearly wants to emphasize that the Vedic ritual is p?j? to the gods. I have elsewhere discussed at length the fact that most of the people who come to observe Selukar's ceremonies have little or no idea what Vedic ritual entails, and Selukar has taken some pains to ensure that it may be recognized as a form of p?j?, the post-Vedic paradigm of ritual worship (Lubin 2001). Here he states this explicitly. Yet, in the same breath, he secularizes the act by defining p?j? as service (sev?), that is, and honor' to 'powers' (an 'showing hospitality abstraction glossed parenthetically as 'deities') and to exemplary men (such as himself, no doubt). Selukar's ritual exegesis thus begins to sound like the philosophy of the Rotary Club. The secular language of social ethics is intended to give the impression that this practice, however ancient and traditional, is also in tune with the best aspects of modern secularism. This part of the argument sounds like the liberal, rationalist apologetics often heard in the West: religion is good because it is good for society. Yet the argument in this case is made to promote a return to 'high-cult' orthodoxy. YAJ?A AS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY A similar tactic is to present the Vedic ritual as scientific in essence. The same  310 / Timothy Lubin pamphlet asserts: The four monthly sacrifice shows the temporal junctures in the sequence of seasons. This medicinal sacrifice is accepted as maintaining the good health of human life. Disease ismore aggressive during the transitional periods between summer, monsoon, and winter. Crowds of people afflicted with illness tend to form at doctors' offices during just this period between two seasons, and those [doctors] make a lot of money. Hence a curative or medicinal sacrifice is undertaken in this transitional time (Anonymous nd: 3). Selukar and those who write in his publications have long emphasized what they view as the scientific nature of Vedic ritual. 'The structure of the yaj?a is a guidebook to geometry,' begins an essay entitled 'Yaj?a theory viewed from the scientific perspective,' by S. N. Bhavasar (2000).19 Noting that the layout of the ritual space involves precise measurements in three dimensions, he proceeds to find here briskly 'scalars, vectors, tensors,...symmetry, group theory and set theories,...space-time curveture [5/c],...reletivistic [sic] mechanics,... quantum space-time motion, statistics, and dynamics,...elevated, spherical coordinate system,' and so forth (using the English words in the Marathi text; all of those quoted occur in just one paragraph). The claim that Vedic ritual performance can bring about rain, health, and other tangible benefits was voiced by Day?nanda20 and, indeed, has ancient roots. The idea is developed in 'Pune Sahar mem honev?l? Vaidika Paddhat? k? Aitih?sik Mah?yajna' (Historie sacrifice from the Vedic manual to take place in Pune City), a pamphlet issued as an advertisement for Selukar's 1989 p?ncar?tra sacrifice held in Pune. The section in that pamphlet entitled 'The construction of science out of sacrifice' begins: Out of the sacrifices which take place over years, the disciplines twelve of astrology, geometry, astronomy, cosmology (s?mkhya), and metaphysics were constructed. Hence, we consider it proper to call the institution of sacrifice the mother who gives birth to science (Anonymous nd: 8). At the 1992 sacrifice, I was told that a team of researchers from Delhi were coming to measure atmospheric changes during the ritual, in order to confirm the organizers' claim that the mantras and smoke have the effect of purifying the air and causing precipitation.21 All the scientific claims put forward by Selukar are refuted in a Marathi leaflet, 'Aindra Sapt?ha Somay?g var Bahisk?r T?k?,' distributed in Gangakhed at the time of the April 1992 ritual:  Ritual activism inMaharashtra / 311 BOYCOTTTHE A1NDRASAPT?HA-SOMA SACRIFICE which reinforces caste doctrine, reinforces inequality between women and men, encourages blind faith and fatalism, leads to extravagance, and is obsolete. Call of the Anti-Sacrifice Action Committee Brothers and Sisters: Currently in the city of Gangakhed an 'aindrasapt?ha-soma-yajna' is being held. Please consider: 1.Although they claim to be performing this sacrifice for the welfare of all humanity, the real picture and motive is quite different. Under the pretext of sacrifice, they aim to impress on society the preeminence of the priestly class, the superiority of Br?hmanahood, and fatalism. This is an effort to serve the Br?hmana in the name of following Dharma. 'Sacrifice,' being a costly ritual, thereby effects the mental and economic exploitation of the common people and is a conspiracy to uphold the interests of a handful of people. The ancient sacrifices were for the welfare and protection of pleasure-loving, gluttonous, 'kings' endowed with riches. This custom existed for the purpose of maintaining the superiority of the priest in the royal court. Now this effort is being made to revive the obsolete custom of 'sacrifice,' which encourages blind faith, in order to affirm 'Br?hmanahood' and to consolidate the interests of a handful of people. 2. Because of this sacrifice, the caste-oriented mentality and system is being consol ?dated...,There is an effort to reinforce the inequity between women and men. The so-called abbots of monasteries and holy centers of the Hindu Dharma, who support the custom of sati, keep women away from the offerings in the name of purity in the sacrifice. As for abandoned, widowed, or divorced women, they are made to listen to the discourse while remaining at a distance the sacrifice. during 3. The organizers are claiming to eliminate pollution in the atmosphere by burning gh?, sandalwood, and firewood and, in the name of research, are misleading people. In fact, this has nothing to do with research because when you burn any wood only carbon dioxide is produced; and in order to bum wood, oxygen in used. Even if one supposes that there is something worth doing research about, what need is there for reciting formulas, for performing the sacrificial ritual, for affirming the For this superiority of Br?hmanahood? purpose laboratories of physics and chemistry are available. This is throwing dust in the name of research. 4. In this 'sacrifice' roughly ten million rupees are being spent. In order to purge their sins, people who have 'black money' [money acquired through 312 / Timothy Lubin corruption] spend vast sums of unaccounted-for money to get a 'clean chit' (pram?npatra), only to loot the poor again: they then extract money from the poor and needy under the pretext that by donating money they will earn merit. All this money is being put into the limitless expenses. This is a big waste of money. In a 'Hindu' society, in a Dharma, where the number of people who are still illiterate is enormous; where the number of dowry deaths is increasing; where there are not even minimal toilet facilities available to women, no drinking water to famine-stricken available people, no fodder for animals; where unemployed laborers are being forced to move out of their homes?in such a situation, what will be accomplished by performing a 'sacrifice' in which ten million rupees will be spent? Demand an explanation for this unlimited expense. You are invited to: 1. Boycottthis sacrifice which strengthens communalism, encourages blind faith and fatalism, and leads to extravagance. 2. Be aware of the lies being spread about the purpose of the sacrifice. 3. With regard to these matters, think quietly using your own judgment and join the revolutionary movement of the Anti-Sacrifice Action Committee. Sincerely, Yaj?a Virodh? Krt? Samit? This leaflet brings together most of the explicit claims Selukar makes for the value of Vedic practice and refutes them one by one. It argues that yaj?a, fer from being morally or socially salutary, is socially divisive, a throwback to the worst aspects of India's past (the Br?hmana-ruler nexus and its oppression of the lower castes and of women); that it has none of the scientific or ecological benefits that are attributed to it; that it is wasteful; and that it is religiously inauthentic ('blind faith,' 'superstition'). Set side-by-side, the two sides of this argument represented here represent contrasting appropriations of the legiti mating power of science and reason in postcolonial India (Prakash 1999). CONCLUSION Like Gajanan Maharaj of Akkalkot and K?k? Mah?r?j of the Sri Digambarad?sa Matha in Pune, Selukar's Vedic revivalism draws on the traditions of the Br?hmanical Datta samprad?yas and Mar?th? bhakti, reinforced by the modernist  Ritual activism inMaharashtra / 313 religious ideals of the ?rya Sam?j.32 Nevertheless, Selukar uses novel organiza tional strategies and rhetoric to popularize an archaic and esoteric practice. Of all the Vedic revivals India has been witnessing, Selukar's is one of the more in its attempt to ambitious ones. Relentlessly public, it is also very thorough as possible reproduce the priestly Vedic ritual as fully and authentically (albeit without animal victims). Where earlier Neo-Vedisms have tended to simplify the rites for the sake of popularizing the practice, Selukar's aim is to encourage an so that the many may come to exemplary few to perform on behalf of the many, understand the language of yaj?a once more. The very performances themselves are supposed to have a direct effect on the moral and material condition of the nation. last few years, Although already in his eighties, Selukar has been able, in the to establishsome durable institutions in Gangakhed that may continue after his death. He has personally introduced a few younger men into the life of the ?hit?gni (srauta sacrificer), and these, in turn, are teaching and inspiring others to learn to serve as priests and sponsors. Principal among these is Sudhakar Digambar Kulkarni of Warje Malwadi, Pune, who kindled his ritual fires (performed ?dh?na) in 1998 during Selukar's soma ritual at Hardwar and who has been offering the new-and-full-moon rites since then. While Kulkarni regards Selukar as his guru, Nana Maharaj Kale of Barsi, who also 'took ?dh?na' from Selukar in 1981, has rejected Selukar's practice of substituting pots of gh? (?jya are pasu) for live beasts and, since 1994, has used actual animals where they called for in his offerings. Kale claims to have reverted to the use of animal victims because he thereby experiences a greater spiritual efficacy and power.23 Kulkarni's performance of a soma offering at Barsi on May 7-12, 1998, was meant to reassert Selukar's model.24 In the context of the rise to power of the Bharatiya Janata party, one may wonder to what degree Selukar's religious vision is shaped by Hindu nationalist language of inclusiveness, if politics. The evidence here is ambiguous. His artificial inmany ways, is persistent. Muslim rulers, the Niz?m and the Raz?k?rs principally, are demonized, but there is no general anti-Muslim language directed at contemporary Muslims. Selukar seems genuinely willing to accommodate he is 'honorary Hindus' in his idea of an India governed by Vedic Dharma; yet also at ease with the ideologues of Hindu nationalism: the Satra-smaranam includes a photograph of him bestowing a shawl upon Ashok Singhal, executive most widely president of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad, one of the groups associated with anti-Muslim rhetoric. On the other hand, there are no overt references in Selukar's literature to the Vishwa Hindu Parishad or its sister the Bharatiya Janata party, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, or organizations, the Bajrang Dal. 314 / Timothy Lubin Although his school appeals mainly to poor local Br?hmanas who see new opportunity inVedic revival, Selukar'spublications appear to target an audience of shopkeepers, small business people, and professionals of rural Maharashtra. A valuable index of his supporters is the range of people who purchase advertising space in his commemorative volumes. The usual medium of communication is Marathi; English or Hindi is used only by the occasional scholarly or non Maharashtrian contributor. There is little attempt to reach urban intellectuals or the Westernized elite. His call for a return to Vedic ritual derives its particular appeal from combining the language of traditional values and the cachet of modern science. His Vedic ritual, in comparison with a run-of-the-mill p?j?, manages to look at once authentic and inscrutable. The ritual technicalities are freighted with the same sense of mysterious importance and power that is attached tomedicine, computers, and nuclear physics. Thus, Selukar's Vedic sacrifices make a two-pronged claim of authenticity. From the ideological point of view, they dramatically 'bring alive' an ancient tradition that has had an aura of distant splendor since eighteenth- and nine teenth-century Indologists 'discovered' it, and Indian scholars and reformers presented it as emblematic of a Golden Age in India that could inspire ethnic pride and provide a basis for national identity and cultural renewal. Yet, from another angle, late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century romanticizing of the 'Vedic civilization' tended to emphasize its 'spiritual' attainments and to view the priestly ritualism as an Achilles' heel that ended up leading the culture into corruption through syncretism with idolatrous and superstitious S?dras. Selukar's project departs from this modernist attitude by reaffirming the power of priestly ritualism (the elision of the animal offerings being the major concession to post-Vedic Br?hmanical?and 'modern'!?sensibilities). This enthusiastic ritualism endows his piety with a second form of authenticity that carries more weight with rural, less Westernized populations as well as with a middle class eager to 'apply' Vedic principles in a tangible way. This view is equally modernist in the sense that it seeks to legitimate religion in rationalistterms: yaj?a is to be treated as a technology embodying the wisdom of the Veda in practical, 'scientific' form. This rather utilitarian view of yaj?a reproduces claims actually made in the later ritual literature (s?tras, prayogas, and vidh?nas); in the last two decades, in fact, there has been a spate of 'Vedic' sacrifices held for such purposes as reproductive fertility.25 Selukar's embrace of ritual, whatever his motivations, has been successful in some respects. As a grandiose and exotic spectacle, it has attracted and held the attention of the ruralMaharashtrian populace, who turn out in large numbers at his sacrifices. But the appeal of this enterprise is so far limited to his imme diate region and is bound up with his personal credentials as a guru in the  Ritual activism inMaharashtra / 315 Maharashtrian tradition of Datta and Rangan?tha Sv?m?. He has had trouble attracting attention elsewhere in India, where he must rely on the support of the flat with the uneducated, ?rya Sam?j, whose intellectual ist vision of Veda falls and they have had to condescend to championing Hindu temple piety and communalist activism to attract interest. Selukar's opponents direct against him the same sorts of arguments that Western (Protestant and Marxist) observers leveled at the Vedic priesthood and at Hindu temple traditions: that the Br?hmana priests are cynical humbugs, that ritual is hocus-pocus and superstition, and that priestly ideology is an elite the poor and uneducated. Both sides in the debate between conspiracy against tradition and reform lay claim to reason. For the protestors, 'modern' reason dictates secularism. In Selukar's view, Vedism was modern from the start; he has projected Neo-Hindu values into the Vedic primordium, just as both Buddhist and Br?hmanical works present their own ideals as a revival of those of the earliest Br?hmana sages.26 Selukar further modernizes the tradition by mass as well as employing twentieth-century media (print, audio, video), to 'raise public consciousness.' Even Protestant-style preaching (veda prac?ra), the sacrificial arena is marked out in the fashion of a museum for the sake of public education. In Gangakhed, Selukar has established both a traditional p?thas?l? to train boys in Vedic practice and a Vedic Sacrifice Research Center that produces computer-printed ritual manuals. The gambit of positioning ritualism as scientific (and thus 'modern') follows a pattern of contemporary efforts to find practical applications for Vedic and Sanskrit traditions: witness the string of books on Vedic mathematics and Sanskrit as a computer language and efforts to apply Vedic principles in politics.27 Among these, however, Selukar's modern Vedic Dharma manages to look the most traditional and attracts people from the widest range of social positions because of its emphasis on authentic ('othodox') ritual practice. Notes 1.This research was supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities and the American Institute of Indian Studies. I am also grateful to Frank Conlon, John Stratton Hawley, Philip Lutgendorf, Laurie Patton, and Joanne Waghorne for comments and suggestions. 2. This ritual tradition goes back ultimately to the Rg Veda (ca. 1500-1200 BCE), taking its classical shape a few centuries later in the priestly ritual codes The 'high' priestly cult (called srauta, 'based on sruti,' revela (Kalpas?tras). tion) was well known in North India by the time of Buddha, when newly 316 / Timothy Lubin developing in the Gang? Valley brought new social and urban trade centers political structures and new patterns of patronage. The Br?hmanical literature of this period records the gradual emergence of classical Hindu piety, in which the Vedic fire tradition plays a reduced and increasingly subordinate role as a marker of extreme orthodoxy. In subsequent times, 'Veda' has become an open category that has been redefined by innumerable religious thinkers and movements (see Renou 1965; see also Smith 1989). 3. For surveys of modem Vedic practitioners, see Kashikar (1958) and Kashikar and Parp?la (1983); more recently, fieldwork on the Vaidika Br?hmanas of the God?vari delta in Andhra Pradesh has been published by Knipe (1997), and Smith (2001) has surveyed the situation in Maharashtra and Goa. Vaidika ritualists can also be found, for instance, in agrah?ras in Konneri Rajapuram, Sengalipuram, and Tippirajapuram, all in the vicinity of Kumbakonam, in the Cauvery delta. 4. This was done, for example, by Ananthanarayana Dikshitar of the agrah?ra inMusiri, Tamilnadu; I thank Pandita Srivatsarahg?c?rya of the ?cole Fran?aise d'Extr?me-Orient, Centre de Pondich?ry, for this information. Knipe (1997) also reports on the problems vaidika ritualists face from opponents of animal slaughter. 5.1 have discussed the ritual dimensions of the 1992 event in detail in Lubin (2001); on Selukar, see also Smith (1987: 49-51, especially nI70, 2001: 451-53,461). 6. This class comprises the most routine rites and calls for offerings of various milk products and grain preparations. All soma rites, the highest and most complex ceremonies, involve subsidiary offerings of animals as well as the main offerings of the pressed soma juice. 7. Mimamsak subsequently maintained contact with Selukar. A letter from him (printed in the souvenir booklet from the 1992 Gangakhed sacrifice) praises Selukar for managing to perform the costly Vedic rites while living the frugal life of a renunciant (Selukar 1992: [7]); a photograph of Selukar bestowing a shawl on him appears inDharmadhikari, Ranade, Thite, and Kulkarni (2000), in plates between pages 136 and 137. 8. It is an academic center for the study of Vedic texts and the documenting of Vedic ritual practice. 9. Most of the information on Vishvanatha comes from the anonymously authored 'Biography of Brahmarshi Shri Aravattur Seetharama Viswanatha Srouthi' (2000: 202-5; see also Smith 2001: 450-53). 10. An ascetic who has not only renounced householder life and ritual yaj?as but who has gone so far as to discard all ritual markers and caste purity rules.  Ritual activism inMaharashtra / 317 11.Datta is mentioned in the Lil?caritra (ek?nka \,p?rv?rdha 43, 62, 312, uttar?rdha 113, 284) and the S?trap?tha (282-85). 12. The parampar? of the Svar?pa samprad?ya is: Samarth Akkalkot Mah?r?j (d. 1878) > R?m?nand B?dakar Mah?r?j > V?sudev?nand Sarasvat? Mah?r?j (= Raosaheb Sahasrabuddhe, 1854-1914) > Digambarad?s Mah?r?j (= Vitthalrao Joshi) > K?k? Mah?r?j (= Ashokrao R. Joshi, currently enthroned). V?su dev?nand is the author of several works in Sanskrit and Marathi on Datta, including the Datta Pur?na, Guru Samhit?, and Gurudevacaritra. 13.Parampar?s are offered by Bhave (1963: 338) and Dhere (1999: 63-65). The tradition is said to include converts from Islam, including one from Q?diri S?fism, but while devotional traditionsin this period involved considerable and mutual among Hindus and Muslims, one should not exchange receptivity simply characterize the ?nanda samprad?ya as an 'Islamic version of Datta samprad?ya' as Kulkarnee does (1989: 203), cited approvingly by Rigopoulos (1998: 116). 14.All translations from Hindi, Marathi, and Sanskrit in this paper are mine. 15. Such conversions remain controversial today, as is evident from the furor surrounding the allegedly 'deceptive' or 'forced' conversion of Abdul Manaf and his family on July 2, 2000, see 'Converted Muslim in Calcutta family alleges in deception' (Press trust of India July 6, 2000) and 'Arya Samaj denies role conversion' (Times of India July 13, 2000). Given the Hindu right's sweeping condemnation of conversion in general, the ?rya Sam?j and the Vishwa Hindu Parishad are at pains to represent their efforts as 'reconversion' or 'purification.' 16. For the Hyderabad perspective, see Arya Sa/naj in government's Hyderabad ([1938?]: 42-46). 17. The Raz?k?rs were a paramilitary group founded by Kasim Razvi, ostensibly to defend the Nizam's state. An outgrowth of the Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen, they are demonized in Selukar's literature, as well as in standard (Indian) histories the period, as having terrorized the Hindu populace; for of sympathetic (Pakistani) views of this militia as defending against raiding parties from India, see AH (1962) and Ahmad (1995). It should be noted that I have found no reference to Selukar in standard histories of the period, such as Bhalerav (1987), Kulkarni (1991), and Parlikar (1988). 18.Here the author quotes Bhagavad G?ta (6.41^2) on the yogabhrasta (the who has faltered in his self-control). The implication is that yog? rigorous Krishna Dikshit is such a spiritually advanced householder that he must have been a yog? in his last life who slipped just once from his discipline and was reborn at the pinnacle of householder society. 19. Bhavasar, who is on the faculty of the Department of Space Sciences at the University of Pune, is now part of a research project funded by the Indian  318/ Timothy Lubin Ministry of Defence to develop and apply military technologies supposedly encoded in Kautilya's Arthas?stra (Rahman 2002). 20. In a letter of September 8, 1883, to Jasvant the Mah?r?j? of Singh, Jodhpur, Day?nanda recommended regular hotna performances to increase rainfall and reduce diseases in the state (printed in Mimamsak 1955: 463-65, cited in Jordens 1978:238). 21. Laurie Patton reports that at the Nanded sacrifice later in 1992, one Mr. Agnihotri, who claimed to belong to a tradition of 'live sam?dhi' practice, was collecting smoke from yaj?as in jars in order to measure the purity of the air after sacrifice. These 'scientific experiments' were presented as integral to his asceticism (personal communication, 15October 2001). 22. Smith (2000) has recently written about another Veda-bhakti synthesis that shows many similarities to Selukar's project. In that case, the prominent Pustim?rga leader, Gosvama Gokulotsavaja of Indore, has been performing srauta sacrifices since 1991; with the of a South Indian priest (Agnihotram help Ramanuja Tatacariar of Madras), he organized the first overseas soma sacrifice in London in 1996. Smith's discussion, which appeared too late for me to refer to it in Lubin 2001, describes many of the factors that I explained as para-ritual elements in the 'spectacle.' There too, the spectacle, in encompassing the Vedic ritual, effectively redefined it in terms of Vaisnava theological categories, p?j? based ritual idioms, and public edification. Gokulotsavaji also held an agnistoma in New York City in 2000 (Smith 2001: 456). 23. For details on Nana Kale and his sons, see Smith (2001: 454-58). Smith provides a list of agnihotrins inMaharashtra, to which Sudhakar Kulkani can be added. Laurie Patton, who is writing on Kale, also notes that his yogic studies have played a role in shaping his views on Vedic practice. 24. R. P. Goswami, former director of the Sanskrit Library in the Centre for the Advanced Study of Sanskrit at Pune University (personal communication, 9 August 1998). Laurie Patton notes an echo of the ancient pattern of 'competitive sacrifices' in the Br?hmana literature (personal communication, 15 October 2001). 25. In this he is not out of line with the P?rva Mim?ms? school'stheory of the mechanistic operation of ritual, but he differs in positing immediate, mundane results (as opposed to results that are ap?na, not visible in this life). 26. See, for example, Kaus?taki Upanisad 2.5, which describes speaking and breathing as a continuous 'internal agnihotra [fire offering],' adding: 'Knowing this, the ancients did not perform the [ritual] agnihotra.' Likewise, the Brahmadhammika Sutta (Sutta Nip?ta 2.7) asserts that the ancient Br?hmanas practiced only Veda study and asceticism and never sacrificed cows. 27. See Ajeya Bharat party Manifesto (http://www.ajeyabharat.com/).  Ritual activism inMaharashtra / 319 References cited Ahmad, Sayyid Kamal ud-Din. 1995. T?rikh-e Haidar?b?d Dakkan aur Raz?k?r. Karac?: Iqb?l Buk Haus. Ali, Mir Laik. [1962?]. Tragedy of Hyderabad. Karachi: Pakistan Co-operative Book Society. Anonymous. 2000. Biography of Brahmarshi Shri Aravattur Seetharama Viswanatha Srouthi. In T. N. Dharmadhikari, H. Ranade, G. U. Thite, and G. Kulkarni, eds., Satra-smaranam: Gav?tnayana Satra Mah?soma Gamg?khed y?ga Yug?bda 5101-5102 (saka 1921-22) Smaranik?, 202-5. Gamg?khed: Gav?mayana Satra Sev? Mandai. Anonymous. Nd. Pune Sahar mem Honev?l? Vaidika Paddhat? k? Aitih?sik Mah?yajfia. Pamphlet, no publication information. Arya Samaj inHyderabad. [1938?]. The Arya Samaj inHyderabad. [Hyderabad]: Government of the Nizam. Bhagavad G?ta. 1968. The Bhagavadg?ta (ed. Shripad Krishna Belvalkar). Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute. Bhalerav, Anant. Sv?tamtrya Samgr?m ?ni Mar?thv?d?. 1987. Haidar?b?dac? Aurangab?d: T?rth Sarpsodhan Samsth?. R?m?namd Bhavasar, S. N. 2000. S?striya Drstikon?t?na Yaj?a Darsana. In T. N. Dharma dhikari, H. Ranade, G. U. Thite, and G. Kulkarni, eds., Satra-smaranam: Gamg?khed Gav?mayana Satra Mah?somay?ga Yug?bda 5101-5102 (saka 1921-22) Smaranik?, 39-47. Gamg?khed: Gav?mayana Satra Sev? Mandai. Bhave, V. L. 1963 [1951]. Mah?r?stra S?rasvata; with supplement by S. G. Tulpule. Mumba?: P?pyular Prak?san. Brahmadhammika Sutta. 1965. Brahmadhammika Sutta. In Dines Anderson and Helmer Smith, eds., Sutta-nip?ta, 50-55. London: Luzac. Day?nanda Sarasvat?. 1971 [1884]. Samsk?ravidhi. Sonipat: Y. M?mamsak. Dharmadhikari, T. N., H. Ranade, G. U. Thite, and G. Kulkarni, eds. 2000. Satra-stnaratiam: Gamg?khed Gav?tnayana Satra Mah?somay?ga Yug?bda 5101-5102 (saka 1921-22) Smaranik?. Gamg?khed: Gav?mayana Satra Sev? Mandai. Dhere, R. C. 1999 [1958]. Datta Samprad?y?c? Itih?s. Pune: Padm?gandha Prak?san. Gurucaritra.1990 [1986]. Guru-caritra (ed. Ramcandra Krishna Kamat). Mumba?: K. Bh. Dhavale. Jaffrelot, Christophe. 1996 [1993]. The Hindu nationalist movement in India. New York: Columbia University Press. Jones, Kenneth W. 1989. Socio-religious reform movements in British India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  320 / Timothy Lubin Jordens, J. T. F. 1978. Day?nanda Sarasvati: His life and ideas. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Kashikar, C. G. 1958. The present-day Vedic rituals in India. In, Daivagna Choodamani Vidyalankar Shastri Rewashankar Becharbhai Trivedi abhinan dana grantha, 56-64. Madras: Abhinandan Grantha Publication Committee. Kashikar, C. G. and Asko Parp?la. 1983. Srauta traditions in recent times, in Frits Staal, ed., Agni: The Vedic ritual of the fire altar, 2: 199-251. Berkeley: University of California Press. Kaus?taki Upanisad. 1998. Kaus?taki Upanisad. In Patrick Olivelle, ed., The early Upanisads: Annoted text and translation, 324-61. New York: Oxford University Press. Knipe, David. 1997. Becoming a Veda in the God?vari delta. In Dick van der Meij, India and beyond: Aspects of literature, meaning, ed., ritual, and thought. Essays in honour of Frits Staal, 306-32. London: Kegan Paul. Kulkarnee, Narayan H. 1989. Medieval Maharashtra and Muslim saint-poets. In N. N. Bhattacharyya, eds., Medieval bhakti movements in India: Sri Caitanya quincentenary commemoration volume, 198-231. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal. Kulkarni, Digambar. 1991. Vah?n Gelele P?ni. Aurangab?d: Renuk? Prak?san. L?lacaritra. 1967 [1964]. L?lacaritra (ed. S. G. Tulpule). N?gpur: Suvic?ra Prak?san Mandai. Lubin, Timothy. 2001. Veda on parade: Revivalist ritual as civic spectacle. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 69, 2: 377-408. Mah?pati. 1974 [1762]. Sri Bhaktavijaya (ed. V. S. Phadke). Pune: Yasvant Prak?san. Mimamsak, Y., ed. 1955 [1945]. Rsi Day?nanda Sarasvati ke Patra aur Vijn?pan. Amritsar: Sri R?ml?l? Kap?r Trast. Parlikar, Ashok. 1988. Haidr?b?dac? Pahil? Saty?graha. Parbhani: Asok Parj?kar. Plamenatz, John. 1973. Two types of nationalism. In Eugene Kamenka, ed., Nationalism: The nature and evolution of an idea, 22-36. London: Edward Arnold. Prakash, Gyan. 1999. Another reason: Science and the imagination of modern India. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Press trust of India, 6 July 2000. Rahman, Shaikh Azizur. 2002. India defence looks to ancient text. BBC News 14 May (http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/south_asia/newsid_1986000/ 1986595.stm). Renou, Louis. 1965 [I960]. The destiny of the Veda in India (ed. and trans. Dev Raj Chanana). Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.  Ritual activism in Maharashtra I 321 Rigopoulos, Antonio. 1998. Datt?treya: The immortal guru, yogin, and avatara. Albany: State University of New York Press. Sardar, G. B. 1969. The saint-poets of Maharashtra (Their impact on society). Bombay: Orient Longmans. Savarkar, V. D. 1969 [1922]. Hindutva: Who is a Hindu?. Pune: Veer Savarkar Prakashan. Selukar, Lakshmikant Krishna. 1992. ?hit?gni, Somayaj?, Vajapey?, Rartgan?th Krsna Sel?kar Mah?r?j J?van Darsan. In, Smaranik?, [29-31]. Gamg?khed: Aindra Sapt?hah Somay?ga Sev? Mandai. Selukar, Lakshmikant Krishna. 2000. Sri Krsna D?ksit Somayaj? Sel?kar Mah?r?j Y?mce Srestha J?van. In T. N. Dharmadhikari, H. Ranade, G. U. Thite, and G. Kulkarni, eds., Satra-smaranam: Gamg?khed Gav?mayana Satra Mah?somay?ga Yug?bda 5101-5102 (saka 1921-22) Smaranik?, 137-40. Gamg?khed: Gav?mayana Satra Sev? Mandai. Smith, Anthony. 1983 [1971]. Theories of nationalism. London: Duckworth. Smith, Anthony. 1998. Nationalism and modernism. London: Routledge. Smith, Brian K. 1989. Reflections on resemblance, ritual, and religion. New York: Oxford University Press. Smith, Frederick M. 1987. The Vedic sacrifice in transition. Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute. Smith, Frederick M. 2000. Indra goes West: Report on a Vedic Soma sacrifice in London in July 1996. History of religions 39, 3: 247-67. Smith, Frederick M. 2001. The recent history of Vedic ritual inMaharashtra. In Klaus Karttunen and Petteri Koskikallio, eds., Vidhy?rnavavamdanam: Essays in honour of Asko Parp?la, 443-63. Helsinki: Finnish Oriental Society. S?trap?tha. 1983. The religious system of the Mah?nubhava sect: The Mah?nu bhava S?trap?tha (ed. and trans. Anne Feldhaus). New Delhi: Manohar. Times of India, 13 July 2000. Tulpule, Shankar Gopal. 1979. Classical Marathi literature: From the beginning to AD 1818. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz. Yaj?a Virodh? Krt? Samit?. Nd. Aindra Sapt?ha Somay?ga var Bahisk?ra T?k?. Leaflet, no publication date. TIMOTHY LUBIN is Assistant Professor of Religion at Washington and Lee University.