Joseph, Judah and the ‘Benjamin Conundrum’
2004, Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft
https://doi.org/10.1515/ZATW.2004.011Abstract
This article proposes that the Joseph narrative in Genesis was given its final form sometime after the split of the monarchy, in order to explain the continued inclusion of the formerly northern tribe of Benjamin within the kingdom of Judah. Considering the Benjaminites’ traditional ties to the Joseph tribes, this must have been achieved by a combination of military, political and economic force by a desperate Rehoboam and later depicted by the Deuteronomistic writer of I Reg as reflecting their free choice. Indeed, there is evidence that not all of the tribe’s towns and clans remained in Judah. The Joseph story itself is a vital link in the Primary History and as such must have a long tradition history, but its present form, emphasizing the competition between Joseph and Judah over the »protection« of Benjamin, is seen to reflect this struggle. »The Benjamin Conundrum« presented to those scholars who deny the historicity of the United Monarchy and hence of its split, is why the biblical authors would even bother to mention such figures as Saul and the Benjaminites’ northern ties, unless they were common knowledge at the time that the accounts were composed, and if so, what other explanation is there for the annexation of Israelian Benjamin by the weaker and less developed kingdom of Judah?
FAQs
AI
What explains the shift in Benjaminite loyalty towards Judah during Rehoboam's reign?
Research indicates Benjaminite loyalty shifted due to strong political and social ties with Jerusalem, evidenced by settlements of priests in Benjaminite towns during the late eighth century B.C.E.
How is the Joseph narrative used to justify Judah's dominance over Benjamin?
The Joseph narrative highlights the protective role Judah plays over Benjamin, legitimizing Judah's leadership after the monarchy's division, particularly emphasizing the competition for Benjamin's allegiance.
What significance does the term 'younger brother of Joseph' hold in tribal genealogies?
The term underscores Benjamin's positional identity within the tribal structure, being placed immediately after Ephraim and Manasseh in genealogies, reflecting historical and sociopolitical dynamics.
When did the consolidation of Benjamin into Judah likely occur?
The consolidation of Benjamin into Judah may have happened post-monarchy split, utilizing military and political means by Rehoboam to maintain control over indeterminate northern clans.
Why were Benjaminites depicted as consistently loyal to Judah over Israel?
The Deuteronomistic historians portray Benjamin's loyalty to Judah as a rejection of northern apostasy, establishing a narrative that endorsed their survival as a tribe within Judah.
References (39)
- Cf. F.S. Frick, The Formation of the State in Ancient Israel, 1985, 71-97.191;
- C. Schäfer-Lichtenberger, Sociological and Biblical Views of the Early State, in: V. Fritz/ P. R. Davies (eds.), The Origins of the Ancient Israelite States, JSOT.S 228, 1996, 99 (though she prefers the definition of »inchoative state« over that of »chiefdom«);
- D.M. Master, State Formation Theory and the Kingdom of Ancient Israel, JNES 60 (2001), 117-131.
- We must remember that our modern definition of a »nation« and its political manifes- tation is more a derivative of 19 th century C.E. Europe than of the Ancient Near East. For one insight into the »tribal« character of Iron Age Levantine states see Ø. La- Bianca, Salient Features of Iron Age Tribal Kingdoms, in: B. MacDonald/R.W. Younker (eds.) Ancient Ammon, 1999, 19-23. See also J.W. Flanagan, Models for the Origin of Iron Age Monarchy: A Modern Case Study, in: K.H. Richards (ed.), SBL.SP 1982, 135-156.
- Sheba, too, while called an ynymy >yX in I Sam 20,1, is referred to as »a man of mount Ephraim« in verse 21.
- Interestingly enough, in Saul's final battle (ch. 31), it is only »Israel« that is at his side; »the elders of Judah«, as told in the previous ch., were already busy receiving gifts from David (30,26).
- F.-W. Busch, quoted by J.A. Soggin, Notes on the Joseph Story, in: A.G. Auld (ed.), Understanding Poets and Prophets, Essays in Honour of George Wishart Anderson, JSOT.S 152, 1993, 336.
- N. Sarna, Understanding Genesis, 1966, 211.
- C.T. Fritsch, ›God Was With Him‹ -A Theological Study of the Joseph Narrative, Interp. 9 (1955), 21.
- G. von Rad, Genesis -A Commentary, OTL, 1961, 428; R. de Vaux, The Early History of Israel (trans. D. Smith), 1978, 296; G.W. Coats, The Joseph Story and Ancient Wis- dom: A Reappraisal, CBQ 35 (1973), 285-297; G. Fohrer, Introduction to the Old Tes- tament 2 , 1974, 90 and cf. M.V. Fox, Wisdom in the Joseph Story, Vetus Testamentum 51 (2001), 26-41.
- W.L. Humphreys, Joseph and His Family -A Literary Study, 1988, 15 ff.
- Von Rad, Josephgeschichte und alte Chokma, in: J.A. Emerton et al. (eds.), Congress Volume, Copenhagen 1953, VT.S 1, 1953, 120-127; J.P.H. Wessels, The Joseph Story as a Wisdom Novelette, in: J.A. Loader/J.H. le Roux (eds.), OTE 2, 1984, 39-60.
- T.C. Römer, La Narration, une Subversion l'histoire de Joseph (Gn 37-50) et les Ramans de la Diaspora, in: G.J. Brooke/J.-D. Kaestli (eds.), Narrativity in Biblical and Related Texts, 2000, 17-29.
- A. Wénin, Le temps dans l'histoire de Joseph (Gn 37-50) Repères temporeles pour une analyse narrative, Bib. 83 (2002), 53.
- J.R. King, The Joseph Story and Divine Politics: A Comparative Study of a Biographic Formula from the Ancient Near East, JBL 106 (1987), 577-595.
- C. Westermann, Genesis -A Practical Commentary (trans. D.E. Green), Text and In- terpretation, 1987, 257.
- Such as E.A. Speiser, Genesis, AncB, 1964, 292-346; de Vaux, The Early History of Israel, 293; H. Seebass, The Joseph Story, Genesis 48 and the Canonical Process», JSOT 35 (1986), 29-43.
- Cf. Coats, The Joseph Story and Ancient Wisdom: A Reappraisal, 53-74;
- Westermann, Genesis, xiii, 258; Rendsburg, The Redaction of Genesis, 1986, 79-97; idem, Redac- tional Structuring in the Joseph Story: Genesis 37-50, in: V.L. Tollers/J. Maier (eds.), Mappings of the Biblical Terrain: The Bible as Text, Bucknell Review 33/2, 1990, 215-232;
- Soggin, Notes on the Joseph Story, 336-337 and references there. Von Rad (Genesis, 343) took the middle position, citing at once the story's literary unity and its being »an artistic composition from the representations of the sources J and E.« For a critique of von Rad's position see R.N. Whybray, The Joseph Story and Pentateuchal Criticism, VT 18 (1968), 522-528.
- H. Schweizer, Text Segmentation and Levels of Interpretation: Reading and Rereading the Biblical Story of Joseph, Semiotica 107 (1995), 273-292.
- C. Aling, Some Remarks on the Historicity of the Joseph Story, Near Eastern Archae- ological Society Bulletin 39-40 (1995), 31-39; O. Zudhi, Joseph -The Career of an Egyptian Official, KMT; A Modern Journal of Ancient Egypt 7 (1996), 69-78.
- Von Rad, Genesis, 28-429; Coats, The Joseph Story and Ancient Wisdom: A Re- appraisal, 79; de Vaux, The Early History of Israel, 296; Rendsburg, The Redaction of Genesis, 107-120;
- Westermann, Genesis, 257f.
- N. Shupak, The Joseph Story: Legend or History?, in: M.V. Fox et al. (eds.), Texts, Temples and Traditions -A Tribute to Menahem Haran, 1996, 125*-133* (Hebrew with English abstract).
- Cf. Finkelstein and Silberman, The Bible Unearthed, 46f.
- Römer, La Narration, une Subversion l'histoire de Joseph.
- Soggin, Notes on the Joseph Story, 344.
- Sarna, Understanding Genesis, 212; de Vaux, The Early History of Israel, 297-310;
- Aling, Some Remarks on the Historicity of the Joseph Story; Zudhi, Joseph -The Career of an Egyptian Official; Shupak, The Joseph Story: Legend or History?, 126*-130*.
- Cf. Humphreys, Joseph and His Family -A Literary Study, 154-172; Soggin, Notes on the Joseph Story, 342 f.
- Fritsch, ›God Was With Him‹ -A Theological Study of the Joseph Narrative, 23.
- K. Frieden, Dream Interpreters in Exile: Joseph, Daniel and Sigmund (Solomon), in: V.L. Tollers/J. Maier (eds.), Mappings of the Biblical Terrain: The Bible as Text, Buck- nell Review 33/2, 1990, 193-203; for a literary analysis of Joseph's dreams see S. Bar, A Letter That has not Been Read -Dreams in the Hebrew Bible (trans. L. J. Schramm) Monographs of the Hebrew Union College 25, 2001, 45-59.
- D.B. Redford, A Study of the Biblical Story of Joseph (Genesis 37-50), VT.S. 20, 1970, 66-68. 65 Ibid., 128-137.
- S.E. Loewenstamm, Reuben and Judah in the Cycle of Joseph-Stories, Fourth World Congress of Jewish Studies vol. 1, 1969, 69-70.
- W. Dietrich, Die Joseferzählung als Novelle und Geschichtsschreibung: Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Pentateuchfrage, 1989.
- H. Schulte, Die Entstehung der Geschichtsschreibung im Alten Israel, BZAW 128, 1972, 24-27.
- Coats, The Joseph Story and Ancient Wisdom: A Reappraisal, 74-75.
- Humphreys, Joseph and His Family -A Literary Study, 135-153, 176-191.
Yigal Levin