Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
AI
This paper emphasizes the critical role of school principals as literacy leaders to enhance literacy achievement among students. It explores the necessary knowledge and skills that principals must possess to effectively lead literacy initiatives, including understanding best practices in literacy, data analysis, and the principles of adult learning. By establishing supportive systems for literacy instruction and fostering effective professional development, principals can significantly influence and improve literacy outcomes within schools.
Research on administration from the past forty years emphasizes the principal as instructional leader. However, the research community has done little to specifically examine what literacy knowledge principals of elementary buildings need to possess regarding literacy teaching and learning or how districts build literacy leadership capacity. Because federal legislation has focused increased scrutiny on literacy, the role of the elementary school principal as the instructional leader has intensified. In an era of increased accountability, effective literacy leadership is essential to the development and continued improvement of an elementary school. Yet there is a dearth of research regarding what constitutes necessary literacy knowledge for elementary principals, what skills are needed to assume the role of literacy leader, and how districts can provide school literacy knowledge and leadership skill sets to principals. This study focused on the theoretical orientation Iowa elementary principals hold regarding the teaching and learning of reading in the elementary classroom. Survey data were collected and analyzed to determine the instructional preference principals hone for reading instruction, including preferences for phonic, skill, and whole language instruction. Such preferences vi Iowa Public Schools' Background Data.
2015
Data from national and international surveys of student achievement in literacy pointed to a recurring problem in Australian schools. Although the overall outcome of these surveys was positive, with the majority of Australian students achieving high standards, a significant minority did not. While it is well documented that within the school, classroom teachers affect student learning outcomes most, no turnaround in the achievement trajectory of students has occurred without the dedicated action of school leaders (Leithwood, Day, Sammons, Harris, & Hopkins, 2006). The current paper considers the ongoing Principals as Literacy Leaders (PALL) project and a series of case studies in nine primary schools in two Australian states. The results indicate that the PALL project has had a positive impact on the work of Principals in supporting reading initiatives and that this has helped to improve the quality of teaching reading in primary schools, which in turn has had an impact on student r...
Principal, 2017
Summarizes recent research that is useful to school principals for leading for reading and writing instruction in their buildings.
School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2004
This article provides a framework for practitioners and policy actors that links leadership and literacy. The focus is on the specification of research-anchored scaffolding that can assist school administrators and policy players in their quest to strengthen student performance in reading. The framework itself is built from material culled from 4 lines of empirical investigation: quality instruction, effective reading programs, school effects, and educational leadership. The analysis represents an important dimension of what we refer to as second-generation work on instructional leadership. This is a good time to start thinking about where we want elementary education to go, so that we can regain control over our literacy curriculum 1
Educational Administration Quarterly, 2009
Purpose: This study investigated the relationship between principal leadership and variation in teachers' participation in a new literacy coaching program: Content-Focused Coaching ® (CFC). Research design: Twenty-nine schools were randomly assigned to participate in the CFC program or to serve as a comparison. Interviews were conducted with elementary school principals and coaches, and teach ers completed surveys describing their experiences with their new coach. Correlation analyses investigated the relationship between the categories of principal support and the frequency of teachers' participation in individual coaching activities. Principals' actions and beliefs were also compared across schools, with teachers' relatively high and low participation in coaching, to identify patterns in principal leadership. Findings: Principal leadership was significantly associated with the frequency with which teachers conferred with their new CFC coach and were observed by their new coach as teaching reading comprehension lessons. Principal behaviors associated with teachers' increased engagement with coaches included actively participating in the CFC program and publicly endorsing the coach as a source of literacy expertise to teachers. Principal beliefs
This large-scale national survey of specialized literacy professionals was designed to answer questions about responsibilities, including leadership, and preparation for these roles. Questionnaires, completed by over 2,500 respondents, indicated that respondents had multiple responsibilities that included both instruction of struggling readers and support for teachers. Four distinct role-groups were identified: instructional/literacy coaches, reading/literacy specialists, reading teachers/interventionists, and supervisors. The findings indicated a need for more precise definitions of the roles of these professionals and for preparation programs to include experiences that address the tasks required. Themes discussed included: roles have changed and require more focus on leadership, specialists must be nimble, and they require more in-depth preparation to handle the leadership demands of their positions.
Stagnating literacy rates have left many school administrators grappling for pragmatic solutions to impact student achievement scores on both federal and state assessments. Biancarosa & Snow (2006) suggest that as students move into middle and secondary grades where subjects are increasingly more complex, the importance of literacy skills begins to impact critical thinking on a daily basis. However, problems with adolescent literacy rates may not reside solely with the knowledge students and teachers possess about reading and writing. Currently, an emerging body of literature has focused on the explicit knowledge and perceptions held by administrators in instructional leadership roles. This paper draws upon on what is known about successful leadership practices that are associated with student achievement, but that also distinctively support effective reading programs. Together the theoretical suggestion is that instructional leaders, using both theory and practice, will build the competence and confidence needed to increase achievement in adolescent literacy.
The Reading Teacher, 2009
and forgotten shortly thereafter, but rather that reading has the potential both to change lives in profound ways and to teach us much about the great adventure that is the life we share on this earth. These are the unmistakable marks of the true literacy leader.
Http Dx Doi Org 10 1080 19388071 2014 998355, 2015
ABSTRACT This large-scale national survey of specialized literacy professionals was designed to answer questions about responsibilities, including leadership, and preparation for these roles. Questionnaires, completed by over 2,500 respondents, indicated that respondents had multiple responsibilities that included both instruction of struggling readers and support for teachers. Four distinct role-groups were identified: instructional/literacy coaches, reading/literacy specialists, reading teachers/interventionists, and supervisors. The findings indicated a need for more precise definitions of the roles of these professionals and for preparation programs to include experiences that address the tasks required. Themes discussed included: roles have changed and require more focus on leadership, specialists must be nimble, and they require more in-depth preparation to handle the leadership demands of their positions.
2017
Republic and the Republic of Ireland. In all, he has presented, worked or consulted in more than 60 countries. He has also been the Australian Council for Educational Leaders' Travelling Scholar, giving workshops in states and territories around the country. He has published numerous books, articles, chapters and papers in the areas of leadership, school effectiveness, school improvement, teacher education, and community education and development. He is a past president and a life member of both the International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement and the International Council on Education for Teaching.
The project was funded by the Australian Government as part of its Literacy and Numeracy Pilots in Low SES Communities Initiative. APPA in turn, through the South Australian Department of Education and Children's Services, commissioned a research team from Edith Cowan, Australian Catholic and Griffith Universities to develop a two year program to support principals leading learning in their schools. Congratulations must go to the universities for the quality of the work developed and also to the education jurisdictions in the Northern Territory, South Australia, Western Australian and Queensland for enthusiastically involving fifteen of their schools to be part of the pilot. The uniqueness of the overall team involved in PALL should not be underestimated nor overlooked. From the research, we know that the role of the principal is a key factor in the effectiveness of students learning to read at school. However, APPA believed that the support for this role through a strategic professional development program had never been effectively addressed. This was the foundation for the PALL Pilot project. This report provides a systematic way of evaluating the effectiveness of the program. What is hard to record are the numerous comments received from principals outside the project thanking APPA for this initiative and requesting how they could be involved. Our sincere thanks must go to Leonie Trimper who initiated this work and was President of APPA at the time and John Binks-Williams who undertook the role of Project Manager. Christine Perri and Ann Williams must also be highly praised for the administrative role they played to ensure the program was successful. The report is significant and deserves attention from all levels of government. We believe that the PALL project is an excellent example of the quality professional learning programs that all principals deserve to receive. The research also indicates that there are insufficient resources in primary schools to enable all of the most needy students to receive the support they need to learn to read. This finding is supported in previous research conducted by APPA including In The Balance: The future of Australia's primary schools and Targeting High-Support Students in Primary Schools.
ABSTRACT This paper reports on Australian case study research in schools where principals completed the Principals as Literacy Leaders (PALL) program. The purpose was to gather data about the effects of PALL on principals’ leadership and the impact of interventions in Reading on teaching, student learning, and achievement. Data gathering included interviews with principals, leadership teams and teachers (parents in some schools), a student survey and examples, and reading progress data. Findings indicated that PALL had impacted positively on principals’ leadership and provided a framework to lead their teachers in ways that improved teaching practice, student engagement and learning.
The Reading Teacher, 2020
Teaching is a profession that requires ongoing professional development and learning. This ongoing learning can take place in professional learning communities, in structured professional development settings, and in literacy coaching contexts. This department highlights the ongoing professional development of literacy teachers.
Elementary School Journal, 2018
Elementary and secondary principals were surveyed to better understand their perceptions of the roles and impact of specialized literacy professionals (e.g., reading specialists, coaches) in their schools. A 32-question survey was completed by 103 Pennsylvania principals across elementary and secondary school contexts. Findings include distinct differences reported between roles of read-ing/literacy specialists and coaches, with few differences noted within roles, across elementary and secondary levels. The frequency and type of specialized literacy professional activities aligned with those principals deemed most important to literacy program improvement. Results indicated that surveyed principals viewed their specialized literacy professionals as having an important influence on literacy teaching and learning. The results have implications for those who prepare specialized literacy professionals and those who employ them. These findings corroborate and update earlier studies of specialized literacy professionals that described their multiple roles, including that of sharing in the leadership of the school's literacy program. Rita M. Bean university of pittsburgh Allison Swan Dagen west virginia university Jacy Ippolito salem state university Diane Kern university of rhode island the elementary scho ol journal
This study investigates how the role of the reading specialist (RS) is defined and communicated by principals, and examines to what degree a common understanding of this role exists among teachers, building administrators and reading specialists. The principal' s responsibility in defining and communicating role, and the effect these efforts have on job satisfaction and specialists' perceived effectiveness is also studied. Eight elementary schools in the western part of New York State (USA) are studied. Based on interviews with principals and reading specialists and surveys completed by principals, reading specialists, and teachers, the following themes emerge: a) Principal leadership was essential in defining the RS role; b) A clearly defined RS role was associated with greater RS satisfaction and perceptions of effectiveness as well as greater teacher compliance; c) Greater teacher compliance with a school' s literacy program did not affect beliefs about the proper role of RSs; d) Lack of a clearly defined role in a school was associated with role conflict and role ambiguity for reading specialists; e) Reading specialists, even without coaching responsibilities, served as a resource to teachers, although no time was allocated in their schedule to do so; f) Reading specialists faced challenges due to increased accountability and assessment demands affected by policy, demographics, and accountability requirements. It is concluded that principals must assume responsibility for defining and communicating the reading specialist role within their schools to strengthen literacy programming.
School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2020
This article discusses the impact of a professional learning activity called the Principals as Literacy Leaders (PALL) program on the capacity of school leaders to engage, involve, and support teachers and their school communities to develop a shared moral purpose for making their school more effective in assisting students to become more able readers. It uses data collected from participants in the PALL program together with case study data collected from five Tasmanian schools to analyse the actions by school leaders to develop a shared moral purpose related to facilitating higher levels of student learning in reading. The study shows that school leaders felt more capable in their ability to lead their schools after completing the program and that the development of a shared moral purpose led to improved teaching practices and higher levels of student engagement, students' ability to talk about their learning, and better achievement in reading.
School of Education at Gardner-Webb University. P.O. Box 7304, Bolling Springs, NC 28017. Tel: 704-406-4295; e-mail: library@gardner-webb.edu; Web site: http://digitalcommons.gardner-webb.edu/joel/, 2020
nrconline.org
Over the past two decades, new perspectives on leadership in education have emerged. Research literature documents the growing number of leadership roles played both formally and informally by teachers and demonstrates how they contribute to instructional improvement and ...

Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.