Academia.eduAcademia.edu
A Needle’s Breath Apart: The Unexplored Relationship between Medieval Embroidery and Manuscript Illumination By Valentina S. Grub (This paper was presented at St. Louis University on June 17, 2015 for the Third Annual Symposium on Medieval and Renaissance Studies. For the supplementary materials and power point images, please contact the author.) There is so much that separates medieval manuscript illumination from medieval embroidery; the former painted on animal skins, sewn together, closed from wandering, uneducated eyes and preserved between boards. Embroidery was sewn, the design becoming a part of the ground cloth, intermingling precious silk threads with the warp and weft, the design out in the open for all to see, touch and harm. That is one theory as to why so many more manuscripts remain than embroideries; needlework was an open temptation, and only those religious vestments protected as relics or in cope boxes survive. However, illumination and embroidery have more in common than may first appear. Both are almost completely reliant on animal products; scraped and dried animal hides made the parchment, glue was made from fish and horses, brushes from animal hair, red pigment from crushed beetles, while sheep’s wool and silk-worm thread, dyed often with the same pigments, were used in embroidery. Both also used precious metals. But, most importantly, they are significant products that make up the corpus of medieval art. Medieval art is a subject that has been studied and scrutinized since the Renaissance. But that study has often been anachronistic, and more recently it has become fraught with debates about what constitutes medieval art itself. Early medievalists focused on sculpture and paintings, largely consigning other artistic endeavors to the realm of craft. However, in 1 more recent years scholars have begun to widen their scope of inquiry. One of the major publications which has helped to broaden the range of medieval art history has been From Minor to Major, a collection of essays which focus on the so-called ‘minor arts’ of the Middle Ages. These include mural painting, ceramics, carving, needlework, manuscript illumination, jewelry, enamels, coinage and stained glass. This is all established work, and yet scholars often persist in focusing on individual crafts in isolation from each other. On the other hand, some scholars are more open to the idea of artistic permeability between the crafts; for instance, in Paul Binksi’s latest work on medieval English architecture, Gothic Wonder, he makes brief comparisons between the English Decorated Style and stained glass, embroidery and manuscript illumination. However, he follows other historians by stating that any concrete connection between these arts remains speculative. This, then, is the challenge that remains for historians; to break through the artificial and anachronistic boundaries that we use to separate these artistic products into sequestered categories. The so-called minor arts are often seen as tangential to the main corpus of medieval art, floating around the periphery. But the differentiation between these minor arts and major ones, such as painting on canvas and sculpture, is inaccurate, and would not have been the case in the Middle Ages. And after all, since the point as historians is to try to analyze and understand the past as sympathetically as possible, we should begin to break down those boundaries. In an endeavor to do so, I am focusing this paper on intersection between medieval manuscript illumination and medieval embroidery. Some questions to keep in mind are; what are the similarities between illumination and embroidery? What how do their differences, such as medium and technique, affect their reception? And just who was involved in making both of them? So, to this end I have kept my research criteria relatively broad so as to 2 maximize the effect of the research, though hopefully not so wide as to render it useless. I am primarily going to focus on manuscript made in Western Europe, all except two in England, between 1300 and 1400, which was arguably the high point in manuscript production. There are, however, much fewer surviving embroideries from England at that time, and so I have broadened the range of time and place for the embroidery to include France and Belgium, as well as England. Manuscript illumination has been an increasingly popular area of study for medievalists, particularly in light of the sheer number of extant artefacts. Embroidery, however, is less popular today- a trend at odds with the medieval reality. As needlework historian Rozsika Parker states, “Embroidery was …politically and artistically a leading art, sharing with painting and sculpture the task of affirming the power of the church, the crown and the nobility.”1 This was especially true in England, where the quality of embroidery was such that it became famed throughout Europe as ‘Opus Anglicanum’, work of the English. As both manuscripts and embroidery are of such importance, I looked for evidence that shows the two artistries were in some way linked. Using both archival evidence and the fruits of visual analysis, I found that not only are there motifs shared between the two mediums, but there are also indications that some artisans practiced both embroidery and manuscript illumination. In certain instances, both needlework and painting are also present in the same artefact. To begin with, there are many motifs that were common to both manuscript illumination and embroidery. For instance, the lion was a common motif, known for being the symbol of St. Mark and part of the coat of arms of England. Here it appears similarly rendered in bestiaries from the Bibliothèque Nationale de France and the Bodleian Library. 1 (Parker 1984), 42. 3 Notice how both renderings have canine features, such as the face, tongue and teeth. Also, the manes are show to be very curly. Now compare that to these lions on the right. This is a fragment of what is thought to have been a horse trapping, now in the Cluny Museum. Probably made in England c.1330-1340, making it roughly contemporary to these manuscripts, it is made of red-dyed silk richly embroidered with gold thread. The similarities between the depiction of the fur and claws is striking, in spite of the different mediums. The Luttrell Psalter, made between 1320-1340 for Sir Geoffrey Luttrell, is particularly famous for the detailed marginalia depicting contemporary everyday life. Though it is tempting to think that this was what the Cluny horse trapping looked like when intact, many of the images in the Luttrell are hyperbolic and unrealistic. Notice how embroidery covers every available surface of the horse, rider, and the shield. The women (thought to be Luttrell’s wife and daughter) are both wearing gowns that are fantastic in their heraldic embroidery. The background of the image is also very similar to the foliage in the background of the horse trapping. This dense foliage is typical in both manuscripts and embroidery from England, and was used to thickly fill in any empty background space. I believe that this harkened back to the myths of the British Isles, particularly King Arthur and other courtly romances, which would often take place in magical forests. While these two manuscripts reflect a more general aesthetic trend, other manuscripts show that illuminators had more than a passing familiarity with the embroidery industry. Embroidery is not only depicted in manuscripts, but also has a direct impact on their motifs. For instance, the mid-fourteenth century Gorleston Psalter not only has many interesting marginal images; the borders are also significant because they mimic contemporary vestment borders. 4 Zooming in closer, there are a series of small blocks filled with lions and fleur-de-lis. Compare that with this thirteenth-century sandal, found in a tomb at Canterbury Cathedral, possibly having belonged to Herbert Walter, Archbishop of Canterbury from 1193-1205. The sandal also has elaborate swags and swirls, and significantly shows the same type of lion that we saw in the Gorleston and Luttrell manuscripts and the Cluny horse trappings. One of the most famous depictions of embroidery in manuscripts are images of the Virgin Mary. Most often, she is portrayed as a child, holding needle and threat, busy learning the feminine arts. Here is a fourteenth-century altarpiece from Spain, depicting the Virgin and her classmates presenting intricately worked samplers to their teacher. We know that these are embroidery samplers because, on closer inspection, the designs are asymmetrical, and so could not have been made on a loom. Unfprtuantely there are no samplers from this time period. The next image is unusual because it shows Mary as a grown woman, sewing as her family looks on. It is from a Spanish fifteenth century book of hours, and is significant not only for its quality but also because it shows Mary in the foreground and Joseph in the background, both of whom are larger than Christ. The size difference is an endearing reminder of Christ’s humanity, emphasized by the domestic pursuits at hand as he helps his mother with her sewing. In the image it is very clear that she is embellishing a piece of white cloth while resting it on a pillow, embellishment that is picked up on in the garments of the Family and the border of the picture. The next image is a close up from a scene of the Crucifixion, also from the Glorleston Psalter. The background, done in shades of ochre and illuminated in gold, is embossed with minute pinpricks in the shape of lozenges. The pinpricks mimic the effect of needlework, which is evident in this fragment of an orphrey. Both the Gorleston Psalter and this orphrey 5 were made in England within a century of each other. The orphrey, also with golden lozenges in the background, shows two angels flanking an unidentified saint, but like the illumination, the embroidery has a striking amount of detail in the golden background. The depiction of embroidery in manuscripts was not uncommon, but there is also evidence of the reverse being true as well. Certain tropes that would seem to have been reserved for the written work also appear in embroidery. This silk-velvet fragment of an altarpiece was made in the mid to late fifteenth century. It is embelished with a variety of colored and silver-gilt threads, with two pairs of embroidered appliques. These appliques show two couples, probably the commissioner of the piece, Henry and Thomas Smyth and their wives. A prayer in Latin is inscribed in two scrolls above the couples; though embroidery was often geared towards a less literate audience, here the prayer clearly indicates that at least some of the viewers would have been able to read. In addition, the very act of reading the prayer that was sewn into the base material would have acted as a prayer in and of itself. Until this point, historians have been quick to caution that all connection between manuscript illumination and embroidery is speculative at best. However, Lanto Synge, an antiquities expert and historian of the Royal School of Needlework, described that medieval embroidery “shared features in common with manuscript illumination, since the ablest artists of the period provided designs for both crafts; it is known indeed that two thirteenth century French embroideresses, Dame Margot and Dame Aalès, were themselves also illuminators.”2 The mention of these two women, so often overlooked, has only occurred one other time in scholarship. 2 (Synge 2001), 42 6 In 1837, G. B. Depping published an edition of the statutes and rules of the crafts and guilds of Paris that were set down in the late thirteenth century. His work is largely based on a manuscript in the Bibliothèque Nationale de France, Français 11709, the only complete record of the survey carried out by Étienne Boileau. Boileau was born between 1200 and 1210, and fought and was captured with King Louis IX in the Battle of Al Mansurah in Egypt during the Seventh Crusade in 1250. After being released, the King bestowed many favours on his brother in arms, most notably making him the Lord Provost of Paris in 1261.3 In this office, Boileau reprimanded and curtailed the excesses of the Parisian abbots, rebuilt the royal coffers, reorganized the guilds and for the first time recorded all of the professions of Paris, whose only original records are in this book. The second of two record books that Boileau kept was severely damaged in a fire in 1737, rendering it almost unreadable. Dame Margot and Dame Aalès are recorded as members of the embroiderers guild, and they are cross-referenced in an archival document in the French National Archives, specifically Les Statuts de Brodeurs et Brodeuses Valides (Arch. Nat. KK1336 fcxiii verso) where they are listed as both embroiderers and illuminators. This does not seem to be an uncommon occurrence, as there are anecdotal references to many men and women having multiple skilled jobs. What is significant is that these women were members of both guilds in their own right, while women of the time were more often members under their husbands’ names. While my other evidence points to similarities between manuscript illumination and embroidery, this archival evidence proves that there were individuals who worked in both professions, with enough skill to warrant membership in guilds. This membership was not lightly given, as the embroiderer’s guild of Paris demanded that each embroiderer have an 3 (Cazelles 1996), 179. 7 eight year apprenticeship, have a registered workshop, only work in daylight hours, and only use certain, high-quality materials. 4 The rules in England were even more stringent, where court embroiderers often came under the purview of the armourer, due in part to their heavy use of precious metals and their close connection to heraldry.5 The ultimate proof that embroidery and illumination were intertwined are the artefacts in which both appear. The Felbrigge Psalter is a mid-thirteenth century psalter and oldest English example of an embroidered book binding. It was at one point owned by Anne de Felbrigge, a nun to whom the addition of the embroidered cover is attributed. Though the embroidery and the manuscript are not contemporaneous, the addition of the needlework shows that it was not entirely unheard of for embroidery and manuscripts to go hand in hand. By adding the cover, Anne de Felbrigge created a new artefact in which embroidery and manuscript illumination are work symbiotically, drawing the reader in through both the visual and tactile senses. There is also evidence that embroidery and illumination were used in the same works contemporaneously. The ‘Maid of Ghent’ is the battle standard of the Ghent militia, created around 1482. The town of Ghent took the Maid as their symbol in the fourteenth century, which appears prominently on this banner that measures 1.5 meters by 2 meters. The base material is a dark green linen, on which the Maid is painted. The Lion was once gilded silver, using an illumination technique, but now only microscopic traces of the metal remain. The capital letter G is embroidered onto the field in metal thread. The banner is attributed to Agnes van den Bossche (c. 1435-40 – c. 1504) who was one of the few female artists registered in the painter’s guild in Bruges. This is the only extant work attributed to her, 4 (Parker, 1984), 13 5 (Parker, 1984) 22 8 though there are records of many other banners having been commissioned from her. This is the only existing painting attributed to a female Flemish artist in the fifteenth century. Though van den Bossche was known as a painter, this piece also shows that, irrelevant of whether or not she herself embroidered it, she intended the banner to incorporate both embroidery and illumination in a synchronistic design best suited to the medium. Though illumination and embroidery are disparate art forms, they are connected with repeating motifs that transcend the mediums, utilizing similar techniques born from the same artists. This is a beginning step to re-conceptualizing the medieval arts, not as incongruent trades, but rather as arts that were created by both men and women who were multi-talented and involved in a variety of endeavors, a fact that is supported by their membership in various guilds. By incorporating different styles and techniques into a variety of mediums, they left us with artefacts which are more multi-faceted than they may first appear. It is our duty as historians to examine these pieces more closely, and with a more open mind to more fully grasp the expanse of medieval aesthetics and imagination. Bibliography Binski, Paul. Gothic Wonder: Art, Artiface and the Decorated Style 1290-1350. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2014. Cazelles, Raymond. Nouvelle Histoire de Paris: Paris de Philippe Auguste à Charles V. Edited by Association pour la publication d'une Histoire de Paris. Paris: Hachette, 1996. Parker, Rozsika. The Subversive Stitch: Embroidery and the Making of the Feminine . London: I.B., Tauris, 1984. Synge, Lanto. Art of Embroidery: History of Style and Technique. Woodbridge, England: Antique Collector's Club, 2001. 9