School-Based
Psychoeducation
in the Philippines and
Low- to Middle-Income
Countries
October 2021 to April 2022
Margarita Ysabel Muñoz
EA Philippines Mental Health Charity Ideas Research, Deep Report
School-Based Teacher-Delivered Psychoeducation for Children in the Philippines and Low- to Middle-Income Countries
School-Based Teacher-Delivered Psychoeducation for Children
in the Philippines and Low- to Middle-Income Countries
Deep Report
Author/s: Margarita Ysabel Muñoz
Research Period: October 2021 to April 2022
Executive Summary
Mental health issues in childhood and adolescence are significant global
health concerns due to their associations with long-term health outcomes for
individuals and, consequently, for communities. The youth in low-to-middle
income countries (LMICs) are particularly vulnerable to mental health problems
due to increased exposure to a variety of risk factors as well as a lack of access to
quality mental health services. We propose the development of a school-based,
teacher-delivered psychoeducation intervention as a means for youth in these
contexts to gain access to information on mental health as well as to basic
psychosocial support, resources that are commonly limited to hospital settings.
This intervention entails task sharing with school teachers in order to equip
them with the necessary knowledge, skills, and attitudes to be able to deliver
psychoeducation in their respective schools. It is a promotive and preventive
approach to addressing mental health issues within communities; i.e., it is meant
for non-clinical or sub-clinical student populations and it aims to reduce the
occurrence of mental health problems by promoting positive coping and resilience
skills as well as fostering supportive school systems. There is substantial evidence
supporting the effectiveness of school-based, teacher-delivered psychoeducation
programs in improving a variety of mental health outcomes. Although the large
number of ways that this type of program can be operated—depending on factors
such as underlying theoretical orientation and strategies for
implementation—makes it challenging to determine its overall effectiveness,
school-based psychoeducation programs show promise in LMIC settings due to
their value in addressing the “mental health gap.” Furthermore, school-based
programs present a number of advantages. The youth spend a large amount of
their time in schools, and schools are where important steps in social, cognitive,
and emotional development take place. Additionally, existing school
infrastructures can facilitate the large-scale implementation of mental health
promotion programs.
This intervention would be intended for children in grade levels 4-6. Psychoeducation
for students would be conducted over 12-20 weekly sessions, each lasting
approximately one hour. Psychoeducation modules would be developed based on
needs assessment studies that would be conducted among stakeholders and in
1
EA Philippines Mental Health Charity Ideas Research, Deep Report
School-Based Teacher-Delivered Psychoeducation for Children in the Philippines and Low- to Middle-Income Countries
collaboration with stakeholders. The charity would recruit full-time staff to serve as
trainers who would be tasked with training teachers in delivering the psychoeducation
modules for students in their respective schools. Training for teachers would involve
information regarding how they can care for their own mental health needs, provide
basic support for their students, identify students with mental health concerns, and
make referrals whenever necessary. Trainers would also be tasked with providing
periodical supervision for the trained teachers.
Our cost-effectiveness estimate for this model is $85.93 per unit of
improvement on the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) in a year of operation when
considering the charity’s total costs. While relatively costly to implement in initial
years of implementation, it’s projected to become more cost-effective over time as
the program scales up.
We believe it has the potential to be very impactful and we recommend
founding a charity providing this intervention.
2
EA Philippines Mental Health Charity Ideas Research, Deep Report
School-Based Teacher-Delivered Psychoeducation for Children in the Philippines and Low- to Middle-Income Countries
Table of Contents
Executive Summary 1
Introduction 4
Problem Assessment 4
Background 5
School-based, Teacher-Delivered Psychoeducation 6
Psychoeducation 6
Task sharing 6
Intervention Program (Gold Standard) 8
Quality of Evidence 9
Implementation 12
Target Location 13
Acceptability 13
Funding 13
Talent 13
Scaling 13
Externalities 14
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis 14
Weighted Factor Model 15
Recommended Intervention 16
Description 16
Quality of Evidence 20
Implementation 22
Target Location 25
Acceptability 26
Funding 27
EA Funding 27
Non-EA International Funding 27
Local Funding 27
Summary of funding 28
Talent 28
Scaling 29
Externalities 29
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis 30
Weighted Factor Model 31
Conclusion 32
Resources 34
3
EA Philippines Mental Health Charity Ideas Research, Deep Report
School-Based Teacher-Delivered Psychoeducation for Children in the Philippines and Low- to Middle-Income Countries
Introduction
This report was made through the Mental Health Charity Ideas Research
Project under Effective Altruism Philippines. The project was a follow-up to Shen
Javier and Brian Tan’s participation in Charity Entrepreneurship’s 2021 Incubation
Program, in their region-specific track for training people to research the top
charity ideas in a region.
The project's goal was to find ideas that can become highly impactful and
cost-effective charities in improving the well-being of people living in the
Philippines and other low- to middle-income countries. It focused on children and
adolescent mental health. To achieve this goal, we aimed to write deep reports such
as this on the top mental health charity ideas that will come out of our four-phase
research process.
Our research process involved looking into the same ideas in multiple
rounds of iterative depth such that the next rounds of research are deeper and only
on fewer ideas than the last. We systematically evaluated all ideas, comparing them
using the same criteria and the same questions. Some of the tools we used are
weighted factor models that consider different factors such as implementability
and acceptability of the interventions, evidence quality assessments, and
cost-effectiveness analyses.
In the six months of our research, School-based Teacher-delivered
Psychoeducation came out as one of the most promising interventions. Since our
research process does not allow us to research all other ideas in depth, we do not
necessarily take the rest as ideas that are not potentially good. It would be of
interest to explore them more in future iterations of this research project.
Problem Assessment
Mental health issues in childhood and adolescence are crucial because
adaptive and maladaptive ways of functioning that develop during these life stages
can have profound impacts on health outcomes in later life. Risk factors in
childhood can lead to the development of mental health problems that can endure
as the individual grows older, and problems that are not addressed early become
much more difficult to treat in later life stages. Mental health issues during
childhood may also cause biological changes (e.g. changes in brain structures and
genetic expression) that affect one’s functioning. A child’s social environment can
influence their ability to form effective relationships in the future, and children
who are exposed to excessive amounts of stress may acquire compromised coping
capacities and increased sensitivity to stressors, which may make them more
susceptible to developing mental disorders (Zeman & Suveg, 2016).
4
EA Philippines Mental Health Charity Ideas Research, Deep Report
School-Based Teacher-Delivered Psychoeducation for Children in the Philippines and Low- to Middle-Income Countries
It has been estimated that around 13% of youth worldwide aged 18 years and
below have significant mental health problems (Murphy et al., 2017). In LMICs,
mental health issues among children and adolescents are particularly pressing due
to their exposure to a broader number of risk factors compared to their
counterparts in HICs. These risk factors include poverty, the absence of caregivers,
problems with regard to physical health and nutrition, poor quality of education,
and increased exposure to violence and armed conflict. Despite increased risk for
developing mental health problems, youth in LMICs have widely insufficient access
to mental health information and services. This information is especially
concerning considering that more than 80% of the world’s population of children
and adolescents reside in LMICs (Fazel et al., 2014).
One strategy towards addressing the disparity in the number of children in
need of mental health care and the services that are locally available is the
development of community-based mental health systems to complement
facility-based services. A community-based mental health framework entails
increasing the availability of mental health services at the community level by
integrating mental health into primary health systems and the social milieu,
thereby promoting accessibility, affordability, and scalability of services (Kohrt et
al., 2018; Demarzo, 2012). Within this framework, one approach to making mental
health services more accessible to children and adolescents is by integrating
mental health promotion and mental disorder prevention strategies into school
systems.
In the Philippines, a community-based mental health framework would be
in line with the key provisions of Republic Act No. 11036 or the Philippine Mental
Health Act (2018) which emphasizes access to mental health as a fundamental
human right, and mandates initiatives toward the promotion of mental health and
the prevention of mental disorders from the national level down to the community
level through community health centers, workplaces, and schools.
Background
Schools have been considered to be an important context for supporting the
mental health and development of children and adolescents. The youth spend a
large amount of their time in schools, and schools are where important steps in
social, cognitive, and emotional development take place (Xu et al., 2020; Bradshaw
et al., 2021). Additional advantages are that school infrastructures can facilitate the
large-scale implementation of mental health promotion programs and that
schools can provide access to additional social or health services when needed
(Castillo et al., 2019, Bradshaw et al., 2021). School-based mental health programs
have been found to be cost-effective and have the potential to reach a vast number
of children and adolescents, making them especially advantageous in LMICs where
majority of adolescents attend school but have limited access to health-facilities.
5
EA Philippines Mental Health Charity Ideas Research, Deep Report
School-Based Teacher-Delivered Psychoeducation for Children in the Philippines and Low- to Middle-Income Countries
(Xu et al., 2020). Schools are located throughout both rural and urban areas of most
LMICs, and rates of school attendance have improved substantially since the year
2000 (Fazel et al., 2014).
School-based, Teacher-Delivered Psychoeducation
The intervention we are presenting in this report entails task sharing and
training of teachers to deliver psychoeducation activities in their respective
schools.
Psychoeducation
Psychoeducation is an integration of psychotherapeutic and educational
interventions. It involves the delivery of illness-specific information, teaching of
skills for managing non-clinical or related conditions, or both. It reflects a holistic,
competence-based approach which emphasizes health, collaboration, coping, and
empowerment (Lukens & McFarlane, 2004). Psychoeducation programs can be
delivered in a variety of ways based on format, intensity, duration, and theoretical
orientation, and can focus on many different elements, such as education about
specific disorders, relaxation, positive thinking, social skills, coping skills, stress
management, and problem-solving skills. They can be implemented as a sole
intervention or as an adjunct to treatment.
Task sharing
Task sharing, a process which involves moving tasks from highly specialized
to less specialized individuals, has been identified as a potential means through
which mental health services (including psychoeducation) could be made more
accessible to a greater number of people. In the mental health field, initiatives in
various settings have been undertaken to apply task sharing by allocating mental
health promotion tasks to lay health workers. Lay health workers compose a broad
group of individuals that has been considered to include community health
workers, lay or peer providers, teachers, non-health professionals, and other allied
health professionals without specialized training in mental health (Bunn et al.,
2021). Lay health workers have been identified as a potentially valuable means
through which psychoeducation could be made more accessible to a greater
number of people. Some valuable characteristics that are commonly considered in
the selection of NSHWs for community-based mental health promotion programs
are good interpersonal skills, language proficiency in local dialects, position in the
community, and a shared cultural and linguistic background with the individuals
they serve (Bunn et al., 2021).
Task sharing with lay health workers has been connected to improved health
outcomes, cost-savings, and decreased health disparities. Such initiatives can also
help improve mental health literacy among community members, destigmatize
6
EA Philippines Mental Health Charity Ideas Research, Deep Report
School-Based Teacher-Delivered Psychoeducation for Children in the Philippines and Low- to Middle-Income Countries
mental health, encourage help-seeking, improve perceptions of treatment
providers, and modify culturally-based beliefs and preferences (Barnett et al.,
2021).
There have been movements to incorporate mental health promotion
programs into school systems by involving teachers in their implementation. In
addition to how teachers can facilitate students’ access to certain types of
information, it can be through supportive relationships with teachers that students
may become empowered to seek help. Teachers are also in a position that allows
them to identify students with mental health needs and to make referrals when
necessary. Despite these potential advantages of involving teachers in the
promotion of mental health within schools, in LMICs, most teachers generally
receive little training in mental health and feel unequipped to take on such a role
(Nguyen et al., 2020).
School-based, teacher-delivered psychoeducation can be designed and
implemented in a variety of ways based on several factors. These include the
underpinning theoretical model (e.g. CBT, ACT, positive psychology), the amount
of training and supervision allotted for implementers, the inclusion or
non-inclusion of parental involvement, and the duration of the program. Such
interventions may also vary based on the age group that is being targeted (Castillo
et al., 2019). Studies included in a review conducted by Bradshaw et al. (2021)
involved interventions where teachers may not have been the only implementers
(i.e., they may share the responsibility with lay counselors). School-based
psychoeducation programs may also be conducted as a lone program or as a
component of a larger program that targets other school-related outcomes that are
not necessarily related to mental health. School-based psychoeducation programs
implemented in LMICs are often adapted from existing programs in HICs. Gimba et
al. (2020) conducted a systematic review about programs that were directly
developed and implemented in LMICs to identify characteristics and specific
modules that were common among them. The programs varied in the length of
sessions, the frequency of sessions, the duration of the entire intervention, and
assigned implementers (teachers, school counselors, researchers, research
assistants). It was also highlighted how multiple stakeholders, such as students,
teachers, parents, NGOs, and policy-makers, could be involved in the development
of such programs, for instance through the conduct of needs-assessment studies
to inform priority areas and required interventions. Programs were either universal
(for the general population), selective (targeted towards certain subclinical
subpopulations), or indicated (for youth with diagnosed mental disorders).
Selective interventions included modules that were specific to the subpopulation
they aimed to serve, which may include students who experience cognitive,
emotional, or behavioral problems, those suffering from harmful substance use,
victims of war, or youth in conflict-prone areas. In general, the following modules
were common among the 11 studies: an introduction module, a communication and
7
EA Philippines Mental Health Charity Ideas Research, Deep Report
School-Based Teacher-Delivered Psychoeducation for Children in the Philippines and Low- to Middle-Income Countries
relationship module, a psychoeducation module, a cognitive skills module, a
behavioral skills module, a module on establishing social networks for recovery
and help seeking behavioral activities, and a conclusion module.
Several challenges have been observed in the implementation of programs
that involve task sharing to lay workers, including teachers. Some of the major
problems that have been identified are low compensation and lack of training and
supervision— factors that may affect their motivation to participate in mental
health promotion programs (Barnett, 2021). Other pertinent challenges that could
influence teachers’ capacity to take on the additional role of facilitating mental
health promotion activities among their students are poor role definition,
challenging work conditions, problems in working relationships, issues with
regard to boundaries and confidentiality, burnout and work-related stress, lack of
appreciation for the role of teachers among the community, mental health stigma
within the community and among teachers, and macro-level barriers (e.g.
leadership and infrastructure; national, political, and socioeconomic factors)(Bunn
et al., 2021; Kakuma et al., 2011; Castillo et al., 2019).
Intervention Program (Gold Standard)
Researchers from the National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences
(NIMHANs) in India developed a school-based Life Skills Education program
(LSE) which aimed to teach adolescents basic life skills through participatory
learning methods such as games, debates, role-plays, and group discussion
(Srikala & Kishore, 2010). The model of health promotion underlying this program
was first developed in 1996 but became more established in 2002. It focuses on
addressing common developmental issues among adolescents through highly
participatory activities. It makes use of the infrastructure of the school and the
involvement of teachers in the implementation of the program.
Life skills were defined as abilities which promoted adaptive and positive
behavior that empowered individuals to deal effectively with the challenges of daily
life. The particular life skills targeted that the NIMHANS program aimed to develop
were critical and creative thinking, decision-making and problem-solving,
communication skills and interpersonal relationships, coping with emotions and
stress, self-awareness, and empathy. Through the participatory learning methods
mentioned above, students were able to gain conceptual understanding and to
practice these skills in a non-threatening environment. The program developers
emphasized that the intervention model went beyond didactic methodology and
valued cultural sensitivity.
The outcomes measured included self-esteem, self-efficacy, classroom
behaviors, and adjustments in several contexts including the child’s home, school,
and relationships with teachers and peers. This was based on the assumption that
helping the youth develop alternative ways of solving real life problems would
8
EA Philippines Mental Health Charity Ideas Research, Deep Report
School-Based Teacher-Delivered Psychoeducation for Children in the Philippines and Low- to Middle-Income Countries
contribute to positive improvements in these areas. The structure of this program
can be modified to involve more specific discussions about various developmental
and health themes, including substance use, issues regarding the use of
technology, early marriage among adolescent girls, sexual abuse, bullying and
violence in the community, absenteeism, professional and vocational choices, and
attitudes towards political issues (e.g. corruption, dowry system in India, etc.). The
activities and lessons included in the program are meant to be applicable for the
general adolescent population—“bright and not so bright; outgoing and
introverted; those with problems and those without; boys and girls.”
A study was conducted among 14-16 year old students who underwent a year
of the Life Skills Education program to assess possible improvements in several
mental health outcomes (self-efficacy, self-esteem, adjustment, classroom
behaviors) compared to students who had not undergone the program. The
intervention group was composed of 605 students while the control group was
composed of 425 students. Roughly 1000 teachers were trained to serve as Life
Skills Educators. Outcomes were measured using the Pre-Adolescent Adjustment
Scale (PAAS), the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), the General
Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES). To assess
classroom behaviors, teachers were asked to accomplish behavioral checklists.
The results of this study demonstrated higher scores in the intervention
group compared to the control group in adjustment in several areas—particularly,
general adjustment (p<.001) and adjustment in school (p<.001) and with teachers
(p<.001)— as measured by the PAAS, prosocial behavior (p<.001) as measured by
the SDQ, general self-efficacy (p<.001), and self-esteem (p<.002). No statistically
significant differences were found in PAAS adjustment with peers, PAAS
adjustment at home, SDQ-Emotions, SDQ-Conduct, SDQ-Hyperactivity, and
SDQ-Peers. Additionally, behavioral checklists accomplished by teachers suggested
that there were increases in positive classroom behaviors among students who had
undergone the Life Skills program.
Quality of Evidence
A considerable number of experimental studies have demonstrated
improved outcomes among children who underwent school-based
psychoeducation programs both in LMICs and HICs; however, there is not much
evidence regarding how well such programs could be implemented at scale, nor is
there much evidence of how effective these programs would be in leading to
population-wide improvements in mental health and other social outcomes
(Murphy et al., 2017). Research on the effectiveness of school-based
psychoeducation programs in LMICs is also generally limited. Nevertheless, these
types of programs have continued to receive increasing attention in LMICs.
9
EA Philippines Mental Health Charity Ideas Research, Deep Report
School-Based Teacher-Delivered Psychoeducation for Children in the Philippines and Low- to Middle-Income Countries
Murphy et al. (2017) conducted a review of school-based mental health
promotion programs that have been implemented worldwide and identified the top
eight programs that have had the largest reach. Namely, the programs were
Positive Behavior Intervention and Supports (PBIS), FRIENDS, Positive Action
(PA), Promoting Alternative Thinking Strategies (PATHS), Skills for Life (SFL),
MindMatters, Good Behavior Game (GBG), and Cognitive Behavioral Interventions
for Trauma in Schools (CBITS). Only SFL was developed in a LMIC (Chile). Out of
these eight programs, only FRIENDS, SFL, and GBG had been implemented in
LMICs. The FRIENDS program had been conducted in at least 800 schools in Brazil
and a few dozen in Mexico. SFL was developed in collaboration between mental
health professionals and educational professionals in the 1990s when Chile was
still counted as a LMIC. GBG had been implemented in Brazil. All of the programs
involved the provision of universal support to all students. FRIENDS and SFL
included adaptations to their universal programs to address the needs of at-risk
students. Six programs (including FRIENDS and GBG) were implemented by
trained teachers in the classroom.
The programs included in the review targeted various yet overlapping issues
that are relevant to the youth, including social-emotional learning (SEL),
internalizing and externalizing problems, anti-bullying, and well-being and
resilience. All of the programs had undergone evaluations using RCTs or
quasi-experimental designs. The collective evidence demonstrated that
school-based psychoeducation programs can have significant positive effects on
the emotional, behavioral, and academic outcomes of students. Evidence also
suggested that such programs are sustainable both in LMICs and HICs, considering
that the programs included in the review all have operated for more than ten years.
Additionally, the researchers observed that programs which combined both
universal and targeted interventions tended to be the ones with the largest scale.
Based on a systematic review of school-based mental health promotion
interventions in LMICs, Barry et al. (2013) contended that robust evidence existed
for the effectiveness of such interventions in improving various outcomes,
including resilience, coping skills, self-efficacy, and reductions in school violence,
bullying, and dropout rates. It’s important to note, however, that out of the 14
studies included in their review, seven were designed for and implemented in areas
affected by armed conflict. Six were multimodal in design and involved addressing
problems in contexts outside of the school, such as family and community. The
authors concluded that mental health promotion in schools in LMICs is feasible to
implement, but among existing programs, few have been scaled up to serve larger
populations of students. They added that the effectiveness of such interventions
improves with increased structure and duration (Fazel et al., 2014).
A more recent review conducted by Xu et al. (2020) about school-based
mental health interventions for adolescents residing in LMICs found considerable
evidence for the effectiveness of these programs in a variety of outcomes, albeit the
10
EA Philippines Mental Health Charity Ideas Research, Deep Report
School-Based Teacher-Delivered Psychoeducation for Children in the Philippines and Low- to Middle-Income Countries
interventions widely differed in terms of the problems being targeted, the duration
of the program, the components of the program, and the degree of involvement of
relevant stakeholders. Eight programs that were implemented in LMICs (including
China, the Philippines, Mongolia, Cambodia, and Malaysia) were considered in the
review. All of them targeted adolescents 10-19 years old and were evaluated both
through RCT and non-RCT studies. The topics covered by the different
interventions were diverse, ranging from life skills to promote emotional well
being, to sexual and reproductive health, de-worming, nutrition, obesity, tobacco
use, and suicide. The shortest interventions took 6-12 weeks to implement, while
the longest interventions took up to 36 months to implement. Some interventions
addressed only a single action area (e.g., developing personal skills) while others
combined several action areas, such as the development of a school health policy
(e.g., integration of mental health programs into regular school curricula) and the
creation of a supportive environment (e.g. renovation of grounds, improvement of
latrines, enhancement of water supply) alongside the promotion of positive skills
among students. Five out of the eight studied interventions delivered mental
health promotion via teachers or other professionals, such as guidance counselors,
psychologists, etc.
Some interventions emphasized the importance of collaborating with health
and other sectors, such as religious groups and local government units, in ensuring
the success and sustainability of school-based interventions. Researchers argued
that, in order to effectively scale a program, factors such as the acceptability of the
intervention to government officials and the involvement of teachers at the early
stages of programming to foster their appreciation for the process need to be
considered. They also argued that an effective way to scale up and sustain a
school-based mental health program is by integrating it into the school
curriculum.
In terms of the evidence for their effectiveness, Xu et al. (2020) found that
all studies on the different interventions reported significant changes in mental
health knowledge and attitudes among teachers and students. Interventions that
targeted specific outcomes such as handwashing behaviors, use of contraceptives,
and changes in school policies and environment also achieved significant
improvements in these areas. On the other hand, ne study that aimed to promote
life skills in order to foster emotional wellbeing had a small sample size, and while
a significant reduction in aggressive behavior and externalizing symptoms were
observed in high-risk male students, the effect sizes were only moderate (0.48 and
0.64, respectively). Additionally, school-based mental health programs have been
found to improve the effectiveness of general education, and skills-based
approaches tended to be more effective than lectures. It’s important to note that all
the studies included in the review were pilot research in nature.
Nguyen et al. (2020) evaluated the effectiveness and ease of implementation
of the Mental Health & High School Curriculum Guide, a school-based mental
11
EA Philippines Mental Health Charity Ideas Research, Deep Report
School-Based Teacher-Delivered Psychoeducation for Children in the Philippines and Low- to Middle-Income Countries
health literacy program, in Vietnam and Cambodia. The program was minimally
adapted by the research team to be culturally-appropriate for these two contexts.
In both areas, teachers were trained to implement the curriculum in select
classrooms. Compared to teachers who had not undergone training, the trained
teachers exhibited improvements in majority of the target outcomes, knowledge
and attitudes towards mental health, mental disorder, and help-seeking.
Significant increases in mental health knowledge and attitudes were also measured
among students who underwent the curriculum. On the other hand, some small
effect sizes indicated the need for additional research and development on certain
components of the program. Nevertheless, the authors argued that these findings
demonstrated the effectiveness of teacher-delivered mental health literacy
programs in Southeast Asian countries, even with limited adaptation. They added
that school-based mental health literacy programs were inexpensive,
teacher-friendly, and relatively easy to integrate into school systems where there
are positive attitudes towards “life skills” training programs.
Implementation
The following is a general outline for the potential steps involved in the
implementation of a school-based, teacher-delivered psychoeducation program.
This is based on the methodology followed by the developers of the NIMHANS LSE
program:
1. Translation of the resource materials into the local language
2. Discussion with the national department of education—for the LSE program
implementers in India, they had coordinated with the Adolescent Education
Division of the country’s Department of State Education, Research, and
Training. In the Philippines, likely equivalents of this are the Schools
Division Offices specific to each city or Municipality, all under the
Department of Education.
3. Identification of master trainers
4. Training of master trainers on the concepts of adolescent development,
challenges and opportunities in adolescence, life skills and life skills
education, facilitator methods, activities to be applied in classrooms, and
training of teachers as LS educators
5. Life Skills Education awareness workshops for school administrators
6. Capacity building for teachers in identified secondary schools
7. Implementation of the LSE program in the identified schools over 12-20
weekly sessions, each lasting about an hour
8. Assessment sessions between master trainers and trained teachers every six
months
9. Evaluation of the impact of the program on the sample of adolescents after
one year
12
EA Philippines Mental Health Charity Ideas Research, Deep Report
School-Based Teacher-Delivered Psychoeducation for Children in the Philippines and Low- to Middle-Income Countries
Target Location
This type of intervention would likely be beneficial in developing countries
where the mental health treatment gap exists. This community-based
(particularly, school-based) approach may contribute to making mental health
information more accessible to a larger proportion of the population since it aims
to bring this information to the targeted communities in contexts that are a
significant part of their daily lives. It would be beneficial for countries or regions
where mental health services are limited in availability and often most accessible
to individuals belonging to higher socio-economic classes.
Acceptability
As psychoeducation is a promotive and preventive approach to mental
health, it’s likely to be suitable for localities where mental health is stigmatized
and discussions focused on mental health problems and disorders are likely to be
received negatively by the average lay person.
Funding
A potential source of funding for this type of program would be through
tapping local government funds allotted for mental health and child health, albeit
initial runs of the program could only likely be done at a small scale. At this point,
no specific funding sources have been identified.
Talent
Program implementers would have to establish partnerships with target
schools in order to recruit the teachers who would be trained in delivering the
program.
Scaling
Close partnerships with schools would facilitate scaling-up and support the
sustainability of this type of intervention. By continually communicating and
demonstrating the significance of mental health promotion programs among all
stakeholders, in correspondences with school administrators or refresher training
sessions for educators, continued support for the program would be more likely.
Adequate and well-documented data on the effectiveness and impact of the
program would also be important to support the expansion of the program to a
greater number of schools.
Externalities
As this type of program would be introducing a new set of responsibilities
for teachers who will have to balance them with their regular tasks and other
13
EA Philippines Mental Health Charity Ideas Research, Deep Report
School-Based Teacher-Delivered Psychoeducation for Children in the Philippines and Low- to Middle-Income Countries
ancillary roles, it is probable that trained teachers would experience heightened
stress or burnout due to increased workload. This potential effect on teachers’
wellbeing may have an impact on their teaching performance and may have a
“trickle-down” consequence wherein students become negatively affected as well
(e.g., compromised quality of education). Indirect benefits that could potentially
result from this type of intervention are improved student-teacher relations, and
improved attitudes towards mental health among the school community in
general. As a life skills education program deals with learning strategies for solving
and coping with real life problems, the knowledge gained from it would likely
contribute to improvements in other outcomes beyond those measured in the
original study on the NIMHANS LSE model’s impact.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
The following presents the results of a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) or a
school-based, teacher-delivered psychoeducation program in an LMIC-setting.
Costs were estimated based on projected expenses with regard to the
implementation structure of NIMHANS LSE model. We also used the Philippine
context as our basis to determine average wages and average costs for conducting
certain activities, particularly training sessions.
Costs were estimated for the first year of implementation and the third year
of implementation. This was based on the assumption that the pilot
implementation of the program during year 1 would likely involve a small number
of beneficiaries and thus fixed operational costs would appear disproportionately
high. We argue that the CEA for the third year of implementation would represent a
more accurate CEA of this type of program once it has increased in scale.
Table 1
Initial cost-effectiveness analysis for school-based teacher-delivered psychoeducation -
Year 1 and year 3 of implementation
Year of Estimated number of Unit $ per unit, $ per unit,
Operation beneficiaries total costs intervention
(students) costs only
1 300 (One school) GSES 68.22 1.31
3 1500 (Five schools) GSES 26.91 3.26
The study that examined the effectiveness of the NIMHANS LSE model
demonstrated improvements on several outcomes, specifically adolescent
adjustment in several contexts, self-esteem, self-efficacy, and classroom
behaviors. For this CEA, estimated improvements in self-efficacy—measured
using the General Self-Efficacy Scale—are considered, since self-efficacy is a
construct which is associated with a variety of other mental health outcomes.
14
EA Philippines Mental Health Charity Ideas Research, Deep Report
School-Based Teacher-Delivered Psychoeducation for Children in the Philippines and Low- to Middle-Income Countries
In our review of evaluation studies on school-based psychoeducation
programs, the mental health outcomes that were targeted and measured largely
varied. We were unable to find studies conducted in LMIC-settings which made use
of SWLS or DALYs.
This CEA demonstrates that this type of intervention might be relatively
expensive during the initial periods of implementation but may become
increasingly more cost-effective as it scales up. Whereas it would cost around $68
per one point increase in GSES scores per student during the first year of
implementation, in the third year it would be estimated to cost around $27 per
unit. Intervention costs increase over time but seem to be negligible as this
intervention is generally relatively inexpensive to run.
Weighted Factor Model
We used the following criteria for our WFM: effectiveness (20%),
acceptability (10%), ease of implementation (20%), ease of scaling (30%), and ease
of funding (20%). Effectiveness refers to the quality of evidence supporting
positive outcomes from the intervention. Acceptability is the extent to which
people participating or implementing the intervention see the intervention as
appropriate to themselves and the communities it aims to support. Additionally, it
considers how much of the intervention should be changed to make it applicable to
the participants. Ease of implementation refers to the minimum length of time an
intervention can be at least piloted. Ease of scaling evaluates whether the charity
meets the three criteria for scalability that say there shall be: 1) identified
communities/delivery settings for the intervention, 2) available workforce for
scaling, and 3) availability of implementation infrastructure for scaling. Lastly,
ease of funding is about the intervention’s likelihood of being funded based on its
timeliness or relevance in the region.
We created a weighted factor model evaluation of the intervention, taking
into account its perceived effectiveness based on the available evidence, its
acceptability in LMICs (how well it would fit into the social milieu), and how easy
it’s likely to be to implement, scale, and seek funding for. In rating ease of
implementation, we mainly considered the length of time that would be required
for the first full run of the intervention. We defined ease of scaling in terms of the
availability of infrastructures in the targeted contexts that could facilitate the
expansion of the intervention. This includes the availability of workforce. In
determining ease of funding, we considered priority areas for mental health
research and program development particularly in the Philippines, based on the
National Mental Health Research Agenda developed by the Philippine Council for
Health Research and Development.
Each member of the research team individually evaluated the intervention
on each factor, and the average ratings were calculated. We did this for each of the
15
EA Philippines Mental Health Charity Ideas Research, Deep Report
School-Based Teacher-Delivered Psychoeducation for Children in the Philippines and Low- to Middle-Income Countries
top 8 ideas. Based on the average ratings, we attempted to identify the top 4 ideas;
however, due to the ratings being close to each other as well as our own qualitative
insights regarding the value of several interventions, we first identified the top 6
most promising ideas. We then narrowed down these 6 interventions by ranking
each of them against each other based on the results of their respective
cost-effectiveness analyses. The three ideas with the highest rankings became our
top 3.
For school-based psychoeducation, we arrived at the following ratings for
each factor:
● Effectiveness – 3.75
● Acceptability – 4.25
● Ease of implementation – 3.38
● Ease of scaling - 3.38
● Ease of funding – 4.38
Our initial impressions of this intervention led to a final rating of 3.83. It
ranked the third highest in terms of cost-effectiveness.
Recommended Intervention
Description
In this section, we will be presenting our recommended revisions to the gold
standard intervention to optimize potential implementation in the Philippines.
These revisions are largely based on information gathered from interviews with
Filipino experts whom we identified as being adequately knowledgeable about
child and adolescent mental health, specific mental health issues prevalent among
the Filipino youth, the implementation of interventions for children and
adolescents in the Philippines, and the Philippine education system and education
policy. In particular, we spoke with Dr. Dinah Nadera, a psychiatrist and the
president of the Foundation for Advancing Wellness, Instruction, and Talents, Inc.
(Foundation AWIT). We also spoke with Dr. Teresita Rungduin, a professor from
the Philippine Normal University who specializes in child and adolescent
psychology and psychoeducation, among other areas of knowledge.
Both experts expressed having positive initial impressions about the
intervention idea, stating that it’s an important advocacy and that a “school that
promotes positive emotions well-being will likely be schools that produce good
citizens.” They considered such an intervention to be inclusive, because in addition
to drawing attention to the subclinical populations of students (“the forgotten
16
EA Philippines Mental Health Charity Ideas Research, Deep Report
School-Based Teacher-Delivered Psychoeducation for Children in the Philippines and Low- to Middle-Income Countries
middle who deal with everyday challenges”), school-based mental health
promotion activities would also benefit school administrators and educators.
The experts mentioned that programs of this type already exist in the
Philippines. As mandated by the Philippine Mental Health Law (RA 11036) as well
as the GMRC and Values Education Act (RA 11476) and the Guidance and Counseling
Act of 2004 (RA 9258), the Department of Education (DepEd) and the Commission
on Higher Education (CHED) are required to integrate mental health promotion
programs in schools based on the needs of students. DepEd has implemented a
number of mental health promotion programs for students particularly during the
COVID-19 pandemic.
Existing government programs face a number of limitations. For one, they
tend to be designed to address temporally relevant issues (e.g., coping during the
pandemic) rather than focus on lifespan-oriented concepts that can be integrated
into the school curriculum and continuously taught. These programs tend to be
implemented in individual schools, by individual school divisions, or initiated by
specific Local Government Units. Additionally, despite some of these programs
being based on needs analysis studies among students, the experts noted that the
information we have so far regarding the most efficient outcomes to target in
promoting mental health among the Filipino youth is not enough. Both experts
acknowledged a general lack of an overarching framework underlying these
programs as well as a lack of a unified system for delivering such programs across
schools in a consistent manner. Unless addressed, these issues can significantly
diminish the sustainability of school-based mental health programs.
With regard to whether curriculum-based interventions are preferable to
non-curriculum-based interventions, the experts expressed some conflicting
opinions. Both agreed that integrating mental health promotion into school
curricula would be ideal in that it would be more sustainable and would more
effectively facilitate systemic changes. Dr. Nadera acknowledged that such a task
would be easier said than done. Although she advocates for the integration of
mental health topics in existing school subjects, for a new charity aiming to
implement a school-based mental health program, she recommended designing
interventions that would aim to address a specific, timely problem (e.g. Balik
eskwela, or the anxiety faced by students and teachers as they return to school).
This would not only make the intervention more feasible but would also make it
more appealing to potential funding agencies.
With regard to the specific content of the intervention, both experts
recommended identifying topics that were both developmentally appropriate and
culturally grounded. Dr. Rungduin hoped to see an intervention that was rooted in
Filipino values and character strengths (e.g. pakikipagkapwa). Developmentally
appropriate interventions would entail focusing on mental health issues relevant
during each stage of childhood (e.g. body image issues that may arise during
17
EA Philippines Mental Health Charity Ideas Research, Deep Report
School-Based Teacher-Delivered Psychoeducation for Children in the Philippines and Low- to Middle-Income Countries
puberty).Dr. Nadera stressed the importance of presenting information that would
be culturally and developmentally relatable for students, otherwise we would “risk
leaving them with generic concepts.”
The experts recommended that, at least in the early years of
implementation, the intervention focus on only one grade level or a small set of
grade levels (rather than all grade levels simultaneously) as this would be more
feasible to implement as well as easier to monitor. In developing program modules,
topics should be identified and discussed differently per grade level and ideally
would build up on concepts learned from previous levels. Furthermore, the experts
recommended developing an intervention for grade levels 4-6. At this stage,
children are already capable of articulating their thoughts and emotions but do not
yet have the breadth and depth of influence that children in junior high school
have. Psychoeducational interventions presented at earlier ages would increase the
likelihood of knowledge being ingrained within children compared to if the
interventions were presented in later childhood.
Challenges identified by the experts in terms of implementing this type of
intervention were also identified. Bureaucracy in public schools would likely make
the groundworking tasks for this intervention more difficult in those settings
compared to private schools. Significant barriers to consider when proposing the
adoption of this type of program in schools are the school administrators’ attitudes
towards mental health promotion programs in general. This includes considering
how much the program would be aligned with existing policies and activities that
the school administrators already have in place.
Another important barrier to the implementation of the intervention is the
likelihood that it would not be manageable alongside the current workload of
teachers. Generally, teachers in the Philippines perform many ancillary tasks aside
from their regular responsibilities. Examples are their involvement in disaster
response activities whenever the need arises as well as their roles as coordinators
for the Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps), a government initiative under
the Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD) that aims to provide
financial support to poor households. This issue is particularly crucial to address
since a significant aspect of the intervention we are proposing is that it would be
implemented by trained teachers. The experts recommended that the intervention
involve devising a system through which teachers could develop a community of
support as well as provide means for teachers to seek assistance with their tasks
whenever necessary. Providing compensation to the trained teachers would also
serve as an additional motivator, but the sustainability of the compensation would
have to be considered.
Confidentiality and data privacy of students and teachers who would be
undergoing the program also need to be safeguarded. It was recommended that the
18
EA Philippines Mental Health Charity Ideas Research, Deep Report
School-Based Teacher-Delivered Psychoeducation for Children in the Philippines and Low- to Middle-Income Countries
training sessions with teachers should also include discussions revolving around
work ethics and understanding the value of being told confidential information.
In terms of ensuring the sustainability of the program, the experts
suggested that the development of an overarching, culturally grounded, and
developmentally appropriate framework to guide the intervention would support
its consistent and continuous implementation. Additionally, this would contribute
to the scalability of the program. In order expand the intervention to a greater
number of schools, schools should have a unified understanding of the concepts
being promoted as well as a defined catalog of activities included in the
psychoeducation program. Furthermore, adequate monitoring and evaluation
strategies are also valuable in ensuring the program would be sustainable and
scalable.
In terms of funding, Dr. Rungduin suggested that incorporating a research
component to the intervention would make it possible to seek funding from
institutions that offer grants for research activities. Potential funders would
include the National Research Council of the Philippines (NRCP), the Philippine
Social Science Council (PSSC), and agencies under the Philippine Department of
Science and Technology (DOST) such as the Philippine Council for Health Research
and Development. Dr. Nadera suggested that the special education fund allotted to
Local Government Units could also be tapped for funding school-based programs.
To summarize, based on the information that we had acquired from the
experts we had interviewed, we are recommending the following revisions to the
intervention:
● Design the program to be a form of action research that would aim to assess
the prevailing needs of stakeholders and evaluate the effectiveness of the
intervention in order to support its continual development.
● The content for the psychoeducation modules must be based on needs
analyses, grounded in indigenous values, and developmentally appropriate.
● Rather than high school students, the recommended intervention would
target intermediate level students (grades 4-6).
● During initial meetings with school administrators, the significance of this
type of intervention must be adequately communicated and provided with a
rationale vis-à-vis existing school policies, plans, and programs. These
discussions may be anchored on pertinent laws that mandate the integration
of mental health promotion initiatives into school curricula.
● In addition to developing program modules for students, it would also be
beneficial to develop program modules for teachers that would aim to
increase their awareness of mental health issues, learn skills that would
19
EA Philippines Mental Health Charity Ideas Research, Deep Report
School-Based Teacher-Delivered Psychoeducation for Children in the Philippines and Low- to Middle-Income Countries
allow them to support their own mental health as well as the mental health
of their students, safeguard confidentiality and data privacy, and identify
students exhibiting symptoms of more severe mental health problems and
refer them to the appropriate agencies. Furthermore, a system must be
devised for teachers to be able to easily seek support and guidance from
their fellow teachers as well as from the program implementers.
● The frequency of program assessment sessions between trainers and
teachers would be conducted more frequently—bi-monthly rather than
every six months.
Quality of Evidence
Dr. Nadera and Dr. Rungduin’s insights regarding the challenges that could
be faced by trained teachers are consistent with what existing literature has stated
about the challenges faced by lay workers involved in similar community-based
programs. These challenges include lack of compensation, limited training and
supervision, poor role definition, increased work pressure, lack of familiarity with
the program, low fidelity to training models, stigma towards mental health within
the community, issues related to boundaries and confidentiality, and system-level
barriers (e.g., leadership and infrastructure) (Barnett, 2021; Bunn et al., 2021;
Kakuma et al., 2011; Castillo et al., 2019). More specific to the Philippine context, a
study conducted among elementary and high school teachers in Metro Manila
found that the most common sources of stress for teachers are having too much
paperwork, financial difficulties (particularly low salaries along side high costs of
living), oversized classes, and having to juggle multiple roles at a given time
(including continuing their own professional education, parenting, and engaging
in community service)(Mingoa, 2017).
Addressing these challenges would be important in order to ensure the
success of a school-based intervention that would be requiring the involvement of
teachers in its implementation. In addition to facilitating teachers’ engagement in
the program, interventions with components that aim to reduce teacher stress and
burnout can also contribute to a downstream effect wherein students benefit as
well. Reductions in teachers’ self-reported stress and burnout have been found to
be associated with improvements in students’ perceptions of their teachers’
support in the classroom as well as improvements in academic self-perception
among students (Carroll et al., 2021).
Although a unified, developmentally-informed framework for school-based
mental health programs in the Philippines has not yet been created, a number of
studies have attempted to formulate wellbeing frameworks for the youth that take
into consideration values that are significant to Filipino culture. The BLOOMS
model developed by Cristobal and Bance (2021), though focused on university
students, provides an example of a framework for wellbeing that was formulated
20
EA Philippines Mental Health Charity Ideas Research, Deep Report
School-Based Teacher-Delivered Psychoeducation for Children in the Philippines and Low- to Middle-Income Countries
based on Filipino experiences. The model takes into account academic,
psycho-emotional, physical, social, and spiritual factors that influence wellbeing.
It then proposes the following strategies towards enhancing wellbeing and
promoting holistic growth: Building (caring for one’s physical health), Leveraging
(optimizing resources available in one’s environment), Owning (developing
awareness of negative affect), Opening (releasing thoughts and feelings), and
Molding (valuing and empowering the self).
Researchers have also looked into character strengths and values that, when
supported, could lead to improvements in mental health outcomes. These studies
validated the applicability of these constructs in the Philippine setting. For
instance, Datu and Bernardo (2020) found a significant relationship between the
interpersonal character strengths of fairness, teamwork, leadership, and kindness
to academic achievement, engagement, and life satisfaction among high school
students. This study was based on previous research that had demonstrated that
Filipino students’ achievement motivations tended to be related to socially
oriented motivations. In a separate study, Datu and Mateo (2020) found
associations between several character strengths and positive emotions, negative
emotions, interdependent happiness, and academic self-efficacy among high
school students. The character strengths of fairness, gratitude, and hope were
found to have positive relationships with academic self-efficacy. Love of learning
was associated with interdependent happiness, and gratitude was associated with
positive emotions. This study aimed to specifically highlight the importance of
cultivating character strengths in non-Western societies.
Studies provide examples of potential bases for the content of a
psychoeducation program for children and adolescents, but further research is
needed on indigenous conceptualizations of wellbeing that are relevant for the
youth.
In terms of conducting a needs assessment to identify the most pressing and
timely concerns of the youth, it would be worth it to consider investigating and
addressing the immediate mental health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the
youth as these have been significant and are likely to persist even as we are
transitioning into a post-pandemic world. One major concern that has been
identified is the loss of opportunities for cognitive and social development due to
social isolation and difficulty accessing educational resources. Adolescence is a life
stage characterized by rapid developmental change. During this time, access to
peer groups and rapid social stimuli are crucial for healthy development. Social
deprivation can inhibit or alter this development (Tatum, 2021). Rates of mental
health problems among the Filipino youth also seemed to increase during the
pandemic, evident in data collected by the Philippine General Hospital which
demonstrated a rise in the number of mental health consultations (compared to
consultations regarding other medical concerns) with adolescents from 17% in
2019 to 27% in 2020. Some of the commonly cited sources of stress were online
21
EA Philippines Mental Health Charity Ideas Research, Deep Report
School-Based Teacher-Delivered Psychoeducation for Children in the Philippines and Low- to Middle-Income Countries
learning and the loss of opportunities to socialize and be physically active. The
number of children living in poverty also was estimated to increase due to the
return of migrant workers because of the pandemic. Furthermore, reports of child
abuse during the pandemic increased in number, likely because quarantine
measures have led more children to be confined with their perpetrators.
Implementation
In this section, the final model of the intervention will be discussed with the
theory of change. A visualization of the theory of change for the intervention is
shown below.
Figure 1. Theory of change for school-based teacher-delivered psychoeducation
The following are the key assumptions for the intervention, supported by
information presented in the sections regarding the background and quality of
evidence regarding the intervention.
1. Task sharing of mental health promotion activities to lay workers—in this
case, teachers—would increase the accessibility of mental health
information and facilitate the improvement of attitudes towards mental
health in the community. Task sharing with non-professional or lay workers
has been significantly gaining attention as a promising means towards
addressing the mental health treatment gap. Lay workers, including
teachers, often share cultural and linguistic histories with the individuals
that they serve, and this puts them in an optimal position to alter prevailing
attitudes within their communities.
2. Schools are an important context for supporting the mental health of
children and adolescents (See Background).
22
EA Philippines Mental Health Charity Ideas Research, Deep Report
School-Based Teacher-Delivered Psychoeducation for Children in the Philippines and Low- to Middle-Income Countries
3. School infrastructures can facilitate the large-scale implementation of
mental health promotion programs and can help provide access to
additional support when needed (See Background).
Below is a general outline of the activities that would be involved in the
development and implementation of the intervention:
● Needs assessment
Development of the program modules must be grounded in a
comprehensive assessment of the current needs and issues faced by Filipino
children and adolescents. This may involve gathering data from students,
educators, school administrators, professionals who specialize in child and
adolescent mental health in the Philippines, and relevant government
agencies (e.g. DepEd, CHED). This study should take into consideration
potential differences in responses between public and private schools,
between rural and urban areas, and across different geographical locations
and ethnolinguistic groups. Additionally, it would be worthwhile to conduct
a comprehensive review of extant literature regarding culturally-specific
constructs or associated constructs that have been linked to wellbeing
outcomes in children and adolescents.
● Development of modules for trainers, teachers, and students
Based on the data gathered from the needs assessment, separate
modules must be developed for trainers, teachers, and students. In addition
to the relevant constructs identified during the needs assessment, the
modules for trainers and teachers must also include education about child
development as well as about risk and protective factors that are most
significant during childhood. Modules for trainers would include guidelines
for establishing rapport, maintaining coordination, and providing
supervision to the trained teachers. Modules for teachers would involve
discussions about the mental health needs of educators, skills for
supporting one’s own mental health, and where they could seek support.
Modules for students would involve psychoeducation and positive
skills-building activities that are grounded on cultural conceptualizations of
wellbeing. Similar to the NIMHANS Life Skills Education program discussed
in the Background, it would be valuable for this intervention to make use of
participatory learning methods such as role-plays, debates, and games.
● Recruitment and training of trainers
Trainers would be recruited as full-time staff. Training of trainers
would be held over five days. Trainers would be educated about the program
framework and trained in the delivery of the program modules. They would
also receive guidance on establishing rapport, maintaining communication
with trained teachers, providing supervision, and facilitating monitoring
and evaluation of the program.
23
EA Philippines Mental Health Charity Ideas Research, Deep Report
School-Based Teacher-Delivered Psychoeducation for Children in the Philippines and Low- to Middle-Income Countries
● Meetings and orientations with school administrators
Initial meetings with school administrators of prospective partner
schools must involve discussions about the importance of mental health and
the significance of the school context in determining optimal child
development. Program implementers must determine along with the school
administrators the number of teachers that would be trained and involved in
the program based on the school’s workforce, the student population, and
the teachers’ regular workload. This meeting may also involve an
assessment of existing mental health services that are accessible to the
school community.
● Capacity building and training for teachers
Training for teachers would be done over the course of three to five
whole day sessions. The feasible duration for the training sessions would be
determined during consultations with school administrators. It would be
worthwhile to consider providing incentives for the teachers who would be
participating, such as Continued Professional Development (CPD) credits,
food and transportation allowances, or financial compensation. A portion of
the training program would be focused on identifying mental health issues
commonly experienced by teachers and discussing ways in which teachers
could support their own mental health. The rest of the training program
would be focused on guidelines for implementing the modules for students.
Additionally, teachers would be trained on handling issues regarding
confidentiality, common signs of emotional and behavioral problems among
children, and systems of referral for students needing specialized services.
Lastly, the teachers would be oriented as to the tools and strategies for
monitoring and evaluating the program.
● Implementation of the psychoeducation program for students
Teachers would be facilitating weekly psychoeducation sessions with
their students, each lasting one hour and delivered over 12-20 weeks. They
would be asked to prepare periodical accomplishment reports regarding the
activities conducted as well as the number of students that were reached.
Accomplishment reports may also include data regarding the number of
students that were screened for emotional and/or behavioral problems as
well as the number of referrals that were made.
● Supervision sessions with teachers
Trainers would have group supervision sessions with teachers every
two months. In these sessions the teachers would present their
accomplishments during the period. This would also an opportunity for
them to seek support regarding any challenges they may face while
delivering the psychoeducation program. Despite these scheduled sessions,
teachers should have an easily accessible line of communication with
trainers for consultation whenever they require clarification regarding the
24
EA Philippines Mental Health Charity Ideas Research, Deep Report
School-Based Teacher-Delivered Psychoeducation for Children in the Philippines and Low- to Middle-Income Countries
modules or other forms of assistance. The information collected from
teachers during supervision sessions would be included as data for program
evaluation.
● Continuous evaluation of the program’s process and impact
Measures of mental health outcomes for students and for teachers
would be collected throughout implementation. Other sources of data would
be accomplishment reports submitted by teachers as well as feedback
obtained from classroom discussions and supervision sessions.
● Research and continual development of program
The data collected would not only be integral for the continued
improvement and development of the program but could also contribute to
research on mental health issues among children and on the effectiveness of
school-based mental health promotion programs, particularly in the
Philippine setting. Theoretical and practical aspects of the program such as
module content, the length of training sessions, the duration of
psychoeducation sessions, and frequency of supervision may be modified
based on the results of the evaluation.
Target Location
Our research is focused on identifying the best mental health interventions
in low-resource settings. Our main criterion for choosing the target location is the
scale of the problem of mental health in different regions. Ideally, we would use
country data to compare all low-to-middle-income countries. However, due to the
lack of easily analyzable data, we first compared the Disability-Adjusted Life Years
(DALYs) burden of mental disorders of world regions, as specified by the World
Health Organization (WHO) then the DALYs burden of mental disorders of the
countries in the top region. We used data from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD)
2019. Data was available for individuals aged 5 to 24 years old which is of a similar
range to our priority age group.
Southeast Asia turned out to be the region with the highest burden of mental
disorders, depressive disorders and anxiety disorders in number of DALYs among
the six world regions. The rest of the regions are ranked in descending order of
number of DALYs as follows: African Region, Americas, Western Pacific Region,
Eastern Mediterranean Region and European Region. Income demographics vary
across countries per region and this is important to note to make sure that targeted
locations are indeed low-resource.
For all regions except Southeast Asia, depression and anxiety combined
make up more than half of the DALYs burden of mental disorders. Thus, we looked
into other mental disorders when analyzing the DALYs burden for Southeast Asian
countries.
Indonesia, the Philippines and Vietnam make the top 3 countries with the
highest number of DALYs lost to mental disorders, depressive disorders, conduct
disorder and autism spectrum disorders in the region. Myanmar replaces Vietnam
25
EA Philippines Mental Health Charity Ideas Research, Deep Report
School-Based Teacher-Delivered Psychoeducation for Children in the Philippines and Low- to Middle-Income Countries
as the country having the third highest number of DALYs lost to anxiety disorders.
Indonesia remains the first while Vietnam ranks second and the Philippines ranks
third for the highest burden of substance use disorders in number of DALYs.
Indonesia and the Philippines rank first and second respectively as the countries
having the highest burden of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in
number of DALYs with Thailand joining as the third top country.
Substance use disorders are not considered mental disorders in the GBD
report but they are included in our PICO framework and are commonly addressed
by the studies we found across interventions. Conduct disorder, ADHD and autism
spectrum disorders are excluded in our PICO framework but they are common
target conditions in children in the studies we found.
Singapore is the only Southeast Asian country classified as high-income.
Malaysia and Thailand are upper-middle income countries and the rest are
lower-middle income countries. Thus, Indonesia, Philippines and Vietnam shall be
prioritized. Due to the researchers’ location and expertise, this research focuses on
the Philippines. We still expect the results to be somewhat generalizable to these
other two countries due to their similarities since the interventions we are
investigating are made for low-resource settings and to target common mental
health disorders.
In the Philippines, there is no available local data that can guide us in
prioritizing a specific region or community. The target location then is most likely
to be determined by where the charity can gain the most access to funding,
partnerships, talent and participants. Whether there are organizations doing
similar work shall be considered too.
Acceptability
Insights from the experts that we had interviewed highlighted important
factors that are likely to influence the acceptability of this type of intervention
among the targeted populations. Barriers that may make it more difficult for this
intervention to be accepted and adopted include prevailing stigma towards mental
health, lack of perceived value for this type of program among school
administrators, reluctance among teachers to learn and deliver psychoeducation
regarding the subject matter due to lack of familiarity with it, and the possibility
that the added responsibilities presented to teachers by this task sharing
intervention would compete with their other existing roles. Recognizing that some
of these barriers are unavoidable, the implementers of the final intervention ought
to work closely with school administrators and teachers, not only to communicate
the significance of promoting mental and emotional wellbeing in childhood and
adolescence and to dispel misconceptions regarding mental health, but also to
determine each school’s capacity to integrate such a program into existing systems
so that the intervention could be adapted with the resources available. The modules
for teachers as well as the increased strategies for supervision that would be
26
EA Philippines Mental Health Charity Ideas Research, Deep Report
School-Based Teacher-Delivered Psychoeducation for Children in the Philippines and Low- to Middle-Income Countries
included in the final intervention may also address issues regarding heightened
stress and burnout among teachers that tend to result from increased workload.
Funding
EA Funding
There is currently no funding opportunity for mental health charities from
Effective Altruism organizations aside from the seed funding that may be granted
by Charity Entrepreneurship at the end of their incubation program. The charity
can apply for the EA Global Health and Development Fund but they are not open to
applications at the moment and no mental health charity has received funding
from it in the past.
Non-EA International Funding
There is very limited funding allotted for mental health projects in places
outside developed countries. Two promising sources are listed below:
1. Wellcome is a foundation supporting research on mental health, infectious
diseases and climate and health. They offer funding schemes for mental
health research and interventions.
2. The National Institute of Mental Health is the United States’ lead federal
agency for mental disorders. They only offer grants for research which the
new charity can apply for pilot testing the intervention. They have Scale-Up
Hubs to conduct implementation research on evidence-based mental health
interventions for LMICs in the following regions: East Asia and the Pacific;
Europe and Central Asia; Latin America and the Caribbean; Middle East and
North Africa; South Asia; Sub-Saharan Africa. Their research networks in
Asia have not reached the Philippines yet.
Local Funding
In the Philippines, there are government agencies and other organizations
that can provide funding:
1. The Department of Science and Technology offers various grant
opportunities although they are also mostly for research. Calls from its
attached agencies Philippine Council for Health Research and Development
(PCHRD) and Philippine Council for Industry, Energy and Emerging
Technology Research and Development will be the most appropriate to apply
for. The latter provides grants for startups.
It's worth noting that, in 2018, the PCHRD released the National Mental
Health Research Agenda, which highlights priority areas in terms of
research and program development in the Philippines. One of the
recommendations made in this agenda was the conduct of evaluation
(“what works and what doesn’t) and action research regarding mental
health interventions, relevant and appropriate to the Philippine setting, at
individual, community, and institutional levels.
27
EA Philippines Mental Health Charity Ideas Research, Deep Report
School-Based Teacher-Delivered Psychoeducation for Children in the Philippines and Low- to Middle-Income Countries
2. The National Research Council of the Philippines also gives research grants.
3. As this intervention will be done in a school setting, the Department of
Education and the Commission on Higher Education may provide assistance.
The charity can also directly partner with schools, particularly private
schools, to get an allocation of their budget and for easy access to recipients.
4. Companies doing corporate social responsibility efforts may be worthy to
contact. The League of Corporate Foundations in the country have programs
for health, education, environment, arts and culture and enterprise
development. We think it is likely that they are open to mental health
initiatives.
5. Local Government Units may also be reached out to but interest in creating a
mental health program will vary across regions.
6. Other agencies and organizations can be identified based on the population
the intervention will service. Some populations mentioned by experts are
disaster survivors and drug users. The mental health intervention can be
part or developed as a rehabilitation program by different agencies and
organizations both locally and internationally.
Summary of funding
We expect there to be funding for pilot testing a mental health intervention
since most of the opportunities available are for research projects. Depending on
the target population’s location or mental health-related condition, other sources
may also be available. Funding for the actual implementation and scaling up will be
more difficult to receive but partnerships with the government and other
organizations may open up and be easier if the pilot test is successful.
Talent
The trainers to be recruited do not necessarily need to be licensed mental
heath professionals but preferably should have some background in education,
psychology, or learning and development. For the training of trainers, partnerships
with organizations that provide technical seminars and workshops on mental
health promotion can be sought. One such organization is the Philippine Mental
Health Association, Inc (PMHA), which itself has conducted capacity-building
activities for community health workers and school teachers to be able to advocate
for mental health in their respective communities and schools.
The currently proposed model of this intervention recommends recruiting
trainers as full-time staff, but an alternative approach would be to enlist
volunteers to fulfill this role. Several organizations have organized volunteer
programs that prioritize school-based initiatives in LMICs. For instance, TELUS
International, a Canadian technology company, has supported the renovation of
schools in the Philippines in line with DepEd’s Brigada Eskwela (National Schools
Maintenance Week) and has distributed learning and hygiene kits among students
in partner schools in the Philippines through its Days of Giving volunteer program.
28
EA Philippines Mental Health Charity Ideas Research, Deep Report
School-Based Teacher-Delivered Psychoeducation for Children in the Philippines and Low- to Middle-Income Countries
Hands On Manila is a group that organizes volunteer services for non-government
organizations and community-driven programs.
The teachers that would be trained to deliver the intervention would be
selected and recruited in coordination with partner school administrators or school
division officials.
Scaling
The most effective and sustainable strategy towards scaling up the program
would be to integrate it with government initiatives to promote mental health in
schools, in line with what is mandated in the Philippine Mental Health Law (RA
11036). However, large scale implementation of this program may be difficult in
the first few years of implementation and would only be feasible once there is
ample evidence of its impact. It may be more feasible to begin with seeking to scale
the program within school divisions or districts before seeking city- or
region-wide adoption. Within a country, differences in community characteristics
may be observed between rural and urban areas, different ethnolinguistic groups,
and other social groupings. This is a potential barrier to scaling as these differences
could mean that the intervention might turn out to not be generalizable to all
contexts.
Externalities
The externalities that were identified in the background for this type of
intervention would likely still apply for our final model. One difference is that the
impact of the program on teachers’ wellbeing would now be considered a direct
outcome rather than an externality. Despite the addition of mental health modules
for teachers as well as increased supervision, it’s still possible for the intervention
to add to their existing workload and contribute to burnout if not coordinated well
and tailored according to the needs of school administrators and teaching staff. An
additional benefit that could result from this type of intervention would be
increased awareness and improved attitudes towards mental health within the
school system, not limited to the direct beneficiaries of the program. Furthermore,
as mentioned in the background, improvements in mental health outcomes that
may result from this intervention can subsequently have positive impacts on
students’ general academic performance.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Modifications were made to variables included in the previous
cost-effectiveness analysis to take into account revisions made for designing the
final intervention. The following CEA considers projected costs for the
development of the training modules for trainers and teachers, which would likely
involve outsourcing professionals in child mental health, child development,
29
EA Philippines Mental Health Charity Ideas Research, Deep Report
School-Based Teacher-Delivered Psychoeducation for Children in the Philippines and Low- to Middle-Income Countries
educational psychology, and/or other related fields. Excluding the co-founders, the
estimated number of full-time staff for the charity in its first year of
implementation was raised to five from the original three. These full-time staff
would serve as the trainers. They would deliver training, maintain coordination,
and provide supervision to the identified teachers.
The final CEA takes into account the estimated expenses for initial
orientations and meetings with school administrators (“groundworking” costs)
and three whole-day training sessions for teachers. The latter would be the optimal
length for the training of teachers given the comprehensiveness of the modules,
but in practice the duration of this may vary based on the teachers’ availability. For
this CEA, it was estimated that 10 teachers would be trained during the pilot
implementation in order to reach approximately 300 students (30 students per
individual teacher). These figures are average approximates, but the number of
teachers and students may differ in practice based on each school’s available
workforce, the number of class sections per grade level, and the number of
students per section (which vary across schools). Estimated costs for holding
bi-monthly supervision sessions and for monitoring and evaluation activities were
also included in the CEA. This model includes providing financial compensation to
trained teachers based on the average hourly wages for teachers in the Philippine
context. Similar to the previous CEA, estimated improvements in mental health
outcomes as a result of the intervention are represented by changes in GSES scores.
The following table presents our final CEA estimates for this intervention:
Table 2
Final cost-effectiveness analysis for school-based teacher-delivered psychoeducation -
Year 1 and year 3 of implementation
Year of Estimated number of Unit $ per unit, $ per unit,
Operation beneficiaries (students) total costs interventio
n costs
only
1 300 (One school) GSES 85.93 4.34
3 1500 (Five schools) GSES 35.81 4.82
In its first year of implementation, cost-effectiveness estimates are $85.93
per GSES unit for total costs and $4.34 per GSES unit for intervention costs. While
the estimated total cost per unit is relatively high during year one, it decreases to
around $35.81 per GSES unit in the third year of implementation. These results are
based on the assumption that fixed costs for the charity remain consistent over
time (or increase only marginally) while the number of beneficiaries increases by a
large amount during the same period. This suggests that this is a potentially
30
EA Philippines Mental Health Charity Ideas Research, Deep Report
School-Based Teacher-Delivered Psychoeducation for Children in the Philippines and Low- to Middle-Income Countries
cost-effective intervention; however, it would be difficult to compare these results
with CEAs conducted for other interventions due to differences in the mental
health outcome measures used.
Weighted Factor Model
There is a substantial body of evidence supporting the effectiveness of
school-based psychoeducation in improving a variety of mental health outcomes;
however, it’s difficult to make conclusive statements regarding the impact of this
type of intervention in general due to the diversity in theoretical basis and
strategies for implementation among existing interventions. As the final
intervention would be grounded on needs assessments in the local context and
consultations with partner communities/schools, it can be expected that its
acceptability would be higher than an adaptation of a similar intervention that was
developed in another culture. Implementation of the final intervention may be a bit
more difficult and may require more time due to the inclusion of needs assessment
studies, modules for teachers, and intensified supervision and monitoring and
evaluation procedures. In terms of scaling, the school-based nature of the
intervention provides the infrastructure to facilitate large-scale implementation.
The primary concern would be sustainable talent, albeit the final intervention
would include strategies for mitigating this, as explained above.
Criteria Initial Intervention Recommended
Intervention
Effectiveness (20%) 3.75 3.75
Acceptability (20%) 4.25 4.5
Ease of 3.38 3.00
implementation (10%)
Ease of scaling (30%) 3.38 3.5
Ease of funding (20%) 4.38 4.5
Average 3.825 3.900
There are still many improvements that can be made to our recommended
intervention. Nevertheless, we think its current form is worth pursuing. Over time,
modifications will likely be made to its design based on feedback from
stakeholders.
31
EA Philippines Mental Health Charity Ideas Research, Deep Report
School-Based Teacher-Delivered Psychoeducation for Children in the Philippines and Low- to Middle-Income Countries
Conclusion
This intervention, as well as the other top mental health charity ideas
identified through this research, were the result of a review process that
emphasized evidence-based and contextually-sensitive decision-making. We
assessed these ideas based on the quality of the available evidence surrounding
them, the feasibility of their implementation, their cost-effectiveness, and their
value specifically in LMIC settings. Additionally, insights that we had obtained
from experts in relevant fields allowed us to further contextualize our models for
these ideas and evaluate their applicability in real-life settings. In doing so, we
were also able to identify challenges that must be anticipated once these ideas are
put into actual practice. Our recommendations for the implementation of these
ideas sought to address these challenges.
Through this process, we propose these ideas as viable and potentially
impactful charities that could be developed in LMIC contexts. This report
highlighted a prospective model for the implementation of the third ranked charity
idea—school-based teacher-delivered psychoeducation— in the Philippine
setting.
Whereas in many societies, mental health initiatives tend to focus on
interventions that aim to address existing mental health problems, over the years,
increased attention has been directed towards strategies that seek to prevent the
onset of problems by mitigating risk factors and/or promoting resilience factors.
One application of this approach is through the promotion of positive mental
health concepts in school settings. Several advantages to implementing mental
health programs through school systems have been identified in this report,
including the fact that the youth spend much of their time in this setting and
existing school infrastructures can facilitate the large-scale implementation of
such programs. Furthermore, school is a context wherein much of a child’s social,
cognitive, and emotional development takes place, and empowering them with the
knowledge and skills to promote their wellbeing in this setting during their
formative years potentially can have significant impacts on health outcomes in
later life.
The type of intervention that was the focus of this report involves task
sharing with teachers; i.e., training teachers to deliver psychoeducation to students
in their respective schools. Task sharing to non-specialist workers is a particularly
valuable strategy in LMICs where there is commonly a great lack in the
accessibility and availability of mental health information and services.
Overall evidence for school-based, teacher-delivered psychoeducation
programs demonstrate their effectiveness in promoting protective factors among
children, including self-efficacy, relationship skills, emotion coping skills, and
others. There is limited data on the effectiveness of these programs in reducing
32
EA Philippines Mental Health Charity Ideas Research, Deep Report
School-Based Teacher-Delivered Psychoeducation for Children in the Philippines and Low- to Middle-Income Countries
existing symptoms of psychopathology or in decreasing rates of mental health
problems in later life. Additionally, the diversity in the design and implementation
of such programs makes it difficult to make conclusions on the general
effectiveness of this type of intervention.
In the Philippine context, significant challenges to the implementation of
this program include the likelihood that teachers would be unable to balance
additional responsibilities with their existing duties, as well as prevailing negative
attitudes towards mental health which may influence the willingness of schools
and communities to adopt such programs.
Regardless of these limitations, the advantages this intervention offers for
communities where the mental health gap exists and where stigma towards mental
health is prevalent make it a potentially valuable intervention for LMIC contexts.
Recommendations presented in this report propose a model for this intervention
that seeks to address these limitations and provide a general protocol for a
school-based psychoeducation program that is responsive to the needs of target
populations and is culturally-appropriate. Cost-effectiveness analyses suggest
that this intervention is relatively costly during initial years of implementation but
is expected to become more cost-effective over time. The development of
school-based mental health programs has been mandated by local laws and has
been identified as a priority area in mental health research, and these may facilitate
the acquisition of funding for this type of initiative.
33
EA Philippines Mental Health Charity Ideas Research, Deep Report
School-Based Teacher-Delivered Psychoeducation for Children in the Philippines and Low- to Middle-Income Countries
Resources
Barnett, M.L., Sanchez, B.E.L., Rosas, Y.G., & Fingert, S.B. (2021).Future directions
in lay health worker involvement in children’s mental health services in the
US. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 50(6), 966-978.
Barry, M.M., Clarke, A.M., Jenkins, R., & Patel, V. A systematic review of the
effectiveness of mental health promotion interventions for young people in
low and middle income countries. BMC Public Health 2013, 13(835).
Bradshaw, M., Gericke, H., Coetzee, B., Stallard, P., Human, S., & Loades, M. (2021).
Universal school-based mental health programmes in low- and
middle-income countries: A systematic review and narrative
synthesis. Preventive Medicine, 143,
106317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106317
Bunn, M., Gonzalez, N., Falek, I., Weine, S., & Acri, M. (2021). Supporting and
sustaining nonspecialists to deliver mental health interventions in low- and
middle-income countries: An umbrella review. Intervention, 19(2), 155-179.
Carroll, A., York, A., Fynes-Clinton, S., Sanders-O'Connor, E., Flynn, L., Bower, J.,
Forrest, K. and Ziaei, M., 2021. The Downstream Effects of Teacher
Well-Being Programs: Improvements in Teachers' Stress, Cognition and
Well-Being Benefit Their Students. Frontiers in Psychology, 12.
Castillo, E., Ijadi-Maghsoodi, R., Shadravan, S., Moore, E., Mensah, M., Docherty,
M., Aguilera Nunez, M., Barcelo, N., Goodsmith, N., Halpin, L., Morton, I.,
Mango, J., Montero, A., Rahmanian Koushkaki, S., Bromley, E., Chung, B.,
Jones, F., Gabrielian, S., Gelberg, L., Greenberg, J., Kalofonos, I., Kataoka, S.,
Miranda, J., Pincus, H., Zima, B. & Wells, K. (2019). Community
Interventions to Promote Mental Health and Social Equity. Current Psychiatry
Reports, 21(5).
Cristobal, N. and Bance, L., 2021. Come into BLOOM: A grounded theory of
well-being among Filipino university students. Philippine Social Science
Journal, 4(4), pp.40-49.
Datu, J. and Bernardo, A., 2020. The blessings of social-oriented virtues:
Interpersonal character strengths are linked to increased life satisfaction
and academic success among Filipino high school students. Social
Psychological and Personality Science, 11(7), pp.983-990.
Datu, J. and Jose Mateo, N., 2020. Character strengths, academic self-efficacy, and
well-being outcomes in the Philippines: A longitudinal study. Children and
Youth Services Review, 119, p.105649.
Fazel, M., Patel, V., Thomas, S. and Tol, W., 2014. Mental health interventions in
schools in low-income and middle-income countries. The Lancet Psychiatry,
1(5), pp.388-398.
34
EA Philippines Mental Health Charity Ideas Research, Deep Report
School-Based Teacher-Delivered Psychoeducation for Children in the Philippines and Low- to Middle-Income Countries
Gimba, S.M., Harris, P., Saito, A. et al. The modules of mental health programs
implemented in schools in low- and middle-income countries: findings
from a systematic literature review. BMC Public Health 20, 1581 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09713-2
Kakuma, R., Minas, H., Ginneken, N., Dal Paz, M.R., Desiraju, K., Morris, J.E.,
Saxena, S., & Scheffer, R.M. (2011). Human resources for mental health care:
current situation and strategies for action. Lancet, 2011(378), 1654-1663.
Kohrt, B.A., Asher, L., Bhardwaj, A., Fazel, M., Jordans, M.J.D., Mutamba, B.B.,
Nadkarni, A., Pedersen, G.A., Singla, D.R., & Patel, V. (2018). The role of
communities in mental health care in low- and middle-income countries: A
meta-review of components and competencies. International Journal of
Environmental Research and Public Health, 15.
Lukens, E. and McFarlane, W. (2004). Psychoeducation as Evidence-Based
Practice: Considerations for Practice, Research, and Policy. Brief Treatment
and Crisis Intervention, 4(3), pp.205-225.
Mingoa, T. (2017) Filipino teachers’ stress levels and coping strategies. Research
Congress 2017 De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines
Murphy, J., Abel, M., Hoover, S., Jellinek, M. and Fazel, M., 2017. Scope, Scale, and
Dose of the World’s Largest School-Based Mental Health Programs. Harvard
Review of Psychiatry, 25(5), pp.218-228.
Nguyen, A., Dang, H., Bui, D., Phoeun, B., & Weiss, B. (2020). Experimental
Evaluation of a School-Based Mental Health Literacy Program in two
Southeast Asian Nations. School Mental Health, 12(4), 716-731. doi:
10.1007/s12310-020-09379-6
Srikala, B., & Kumar, K. (2010). Empowering adolescents with life skills education
in schools - School mental health program: Does it work?. Indian Journal Of
Psychiatry, 52(4), 344. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.74310
Tatum, M., 2021. The impact of a year indoors for Filipino children. The Lancet Child
& Adolescent Health, 5(6), pp.393-394.
Xu, T., Tomokawa, S., Gregorio, E., Mannava, P., Nagai, M. and Sobel, H., 2020.
School-based interventions to promote adolescent health: A systematic
review in low- and middle-income countries of WHO Western Pacific
Region. PLOS ONE, 15(3), p.e0230046.
Zeman, J. & Suveg, C. (2016). Developmental psychopathology: Basic principles. In
J.E. Maddux & B.A. Winstead (Eds.). Psychopathology: Foundations for a
contemporary understanding (4th Edition, pp. 18-26). New York: Routledge.
35