CALL FOR PAPERS: Journal Special Issue: Interventions: International Journal of Postcolonial Studies
CALL FOR PAPERS:
Journal Special Issue: Interventions: International Journal of Postcolonial Studies
Journal Special Issue: Interventions: International Journal of Postcolonial Studies
Disability and Colonialism: (dis)encounters and anxious intersectionalities
Guest Editors: Shaun Grech (Manchester Metropolitan University) & Karen Soldatic (University of New South Wales)
We are pleased to announce that we will be guest editing a special edition entitled Disability and Colonialism: (dis)encounters and anxious intersectionalities on behalf of the established refereed journal Interventions: International Journal of Postcolonial Studies.
The aim of this special issue is to position disability within the colonial (the real and imagined), through which to explore a range of (often anxious) intersectionalities as disability is theorised, constructed, and lived as a post/neocolonial condition. While postcolonial theory and associated fields (e.g. critical theory, cultural studies etc.) have engaged with race, gender and ethnicity in the exploration of themes of identity, representation, space, historicity and the neocolonial, they have almost wholly bypassed disabled people- paradoxically limited to the subjectification of the able-bodied, or rather disembodying colonialism. Westerncentric fields of study such as disability studies often remain detached from the global South, the histories, contexts and cultures of these specific geopolitical spaces, and how disability is ontologically constructed and lived through a history replete with signifiers of power and empire and that frame the global. While some have adopted colonialism as a metaphor for the experience of disability (see for example Shakespeare, 2000), of colonized bodies by the medical profession, the colonial encounter per se, its creation of and implications for the disabled subject, remains inadequately theorised. In turn, disability is persistently removed from history and any contemplation of the post or neocolonial and efforts (discursive or material) at decolonizing these spaces and those within.
The special issue aims to transcend disciplinary, epistemological, methodological, spatial and historical boundaries. Engaging indigenous, post/neocolonial, disability studies, critical theory, psychology, Latin American Cultural Studies, and a range of other perspectives and literatures, and prioritising voices from the global South, we invite authors to engage in critical debate around colonialism to explore a range of thematic concerns (not exclusively):
• Colonial representations and the construction of the disabled body and mind
• The violence and disablism of colonialism
• Intersections of race, ethnicity, culture, gender and disability
• Empire and the domestication of bodies: globalisation, economics and beyond
• Disabled identities, metaphors and language, and their roles in subjugation
• From the colonial to the post/neocolonial: disability and contemporary lineages of imperialism
• Social identities and visions of disability
• Colonial medicalisation: identifying, labelling and ‘treating’ the disabled body
• The Christianising mission, biblical renditions and the disabled subject
• Decolonizing epistemologies, practices and lives: renegotiating power and contemplating global justice
We encourage authors to engage work on Southern theory and movements and approaches prioritising and promoting Southern epistemologies and counter-hegemonic knowledges emerging from struggles for justice.
Those wishing to submit an article, please email your full manuscript to both Shaun Grech (S.Grech@mmu.ac.uk) and Karen Soldatic (ajks123@bigpond.com). Please insert ‘Submission for Disability and Colonialism Special Issue’ in the subject line. Manuscripts will be sent anonymously for double peer review, and comments and recommendations relayed to authors through the editors.
Articles should not exceed 8,000 words in length, and include a 300 word abstract. The journal style guide is available here: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/journal.asp?issn=1369-801X&linktype=44.
Manuscripts should be submitted by no later than: 1st January 2013
152 views
Seen by: and 38 more391 views
Seen by: and 18 more14 views
Seen by: and 1 moreHope from Hopelessness: Finding Contemporary Southern Literature through Anne Tyler’s Use of The Sound and the Fury
by Amy Elliott
Presented at Southern Writers, Southern Writing Conference, University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS. Jul. 2002.
Written at the University of Connecticut.
Critical debate focuses on the trend of Southern writers and the classification of their work within the tradition of... more Critical debate focuses on the trend of Southern writers and the classification of their work within the tradition of Southern literature. One side of the argument supports contemporary writers as part of the Southern literary tradition. That is, it proposes that contemporary Southern writers continue to write Southern literature not by writing with the same style and magnitude as Faulkner and Warren, but by basing their writing on this tradition and modernizing it. An excellent example lies in Anne Tyler’s use of William Faulkner’s The Sound and the Fury as a foundation for her Dinner at the Homesick Restaurant. Through characterization and structure Tyler builds on traditional Southern literature to create contemporary Southern literature. By borrowing from Faulkner’s characterization of the Compson family, as each of the Tulls align with an equivocal Compson, and through her structure, which mimics Faulkner’s, Tyler continues to write in the Southern literary tradition. However, as much as Tyler’s characters align with Faulkner’s, it is precisely the differences in the characters, constructiveness and hope opposed to Faulkner’s destruction and hopelessness, that make Tyler’s work a piece of contemporary Southern literature.
Partial Annotation of The Sound and the Fury
by Amy Elliott
Presented at the Belmont University Research Symposium, 2001.
Written at Belmont University.
A partial annotation of William Faulkner’s The Sound and the Fury, this project focuses on the Quentin section,... more A partial annotation of William Faulkner’s The Sound and the Fury, this project focuses on the Quentin section, specifically, pages 125-145 of the First Vintage International Edition, October 1990. Annotations define and explain selected words and phrases from the text that are likely to be unknown, unfamiliar, or misunderstood by the average reader. This project examines linguistics, archaic words, and colloquialisms in some depth, while still including aspects of rural life (i.e. facts, folklore, customs, songs, and sayings); references to local history, laws, and customs; analogues; and various allusions and references. Further, it reflects extensive research drawn from literary criticism, numerous dictionaries and other reference materials, and linguistic text books. All entries are organized by page and line number.
Review essay of "How Celtic Culture Invented Southern Literature"
published in eKeltoi, 2006
Criticism of a book representative of recent efforts to "Celticise" the American South. Criticism of a book representative of recent efforts to "Celticise" the American South.
Horse-Trade, Mule-Trade, Woman-Trade: Comparative Economic Geographies in Faulkner's Snopes Trilogy
Given as a panel paper at the 38th Annual Faulkner & Yoknapatawpha Conference on 20 July 2011.

