Müssen wir erkennen, was wir denken? – Die semiotische Seele bei Ockham
by Martin Lenz
Forthcoming in: Abschied vom Seelischen? Ed. by Hans-Ulrich Rüegger, Zürich: vdf Hochschulverlag 2012
Locke as a Social Externalist
by Martin Lenz
Draft; forthcoming (with a commentary by Michael Ayers) in the Dawes Hicks Lectures on Philosophy: Proceedings of the British Academy,Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012
What determines the meaning of linguistic expressions: the mental states of language users or external factors? John... more What determines the meaning of linguistic expressions: the mental states of language users or external factors? John Locke is still taken to hold the simple thesis that words primarily signify the ideas in the mind of the speaker and thus to commit himself to an untenable mentalism. The present paper challenges this widespread view and sketches an argument to the effect that Locke should be seen as defending a kind of social externalism, since, for Locke, it is primarily the speech community that plays the essential role in determining meaning.
Normative Concepts: a connectedness model
co-authored with François Schroeter
An elaboration of jazz model of meaning: we seek to characterize not just linguistic communication, but normative thinking. We focus on the cognitive role of concepts in keeping track of a topic, through changes in associated descriptive beliefs and motivations. A relational account of meaning identity, we argue, better explains this tracking ability. It also affords new resources for vindicating realism about normative properties.
This paper proposes a relational account concepts and explains how the model fits normative terms like 'is right'. Our... more This paper proposes a relational account concepts and explains how the model fits normative terms like 'is right'. Our connectedness model builds social and historical facts into the foundations of concept identity. This aspect of the model, we argue, reshapes normative epistemology and provides new resources for a vindication of realism in ethics.
Do Moral Realists Need Convergence?
(with François Schroeter)
Doe a moral realist need to posit ideal convergence in moral judgments? Richard Boyd has argued that moral realists... more Doe a moral realist need to posit ideal convergence in moral judgments? Richard Boyd has argued that moral realists don't need to accept that all competent speakers will converge in their moral judgments, if they opt for a certain type of externalist account of the reference of moral terms. Boyd's account has been highly influential: even realists who reject naturalistic and causal aspects of his account have taken his approach as a template for reference determination for moral terms (e.g. Sayre-McCord, van Roojen). But a closer examination of Boyd’s account of reference and the ways it could be developed or modified, we’ll argue, suggests that explaining co-reference without convergence in the moral domain is a much more challenging problem than many realists have supposed.
10 views
Seen by:2 views
Seen by:1 views
Seen by:
