Quantum Cosmology

Unified Field and Four Forces

by Cetin Dincer

In fact, there is not a gravitational field. But there is an energy field. This interaction of energy to... more In fact, there is not a gravitational field. But there is an energy field. This interaction of energy to mass/particle, mass/particle will cause of shows some resistance to energy and accelerates. This acceleration is direction of the energy and this acceleration is proportional with the energy. There are no weights of the mass in space. Masses accelerate easily, even in very small effects. All this depends to direction of flow and shape of energy from mass. On the other hand, we know that an object shrinks when they lost their energy. In the same way that, radiant mass accelerates into the interior of their own. The mass effects distance to the other mass. Masses/Particles accelerate when they receive the energy. Frictionless space, all objects, this effect cause of movements direction of across to the mass. This acceleration is proportional with the energy. The connection between mass/particle and energy:

                                      E=ma

Cosmology and Theology

by Hans Halvorson

The causal interpretation of quantum mechanics and the singularity problem in quantum cosmology

by Acacio de Barros

Phenomenological Sociography and Time Travel

by Peter Theodoropoulos

Related to questions of Time, structure and aspectual dimensions of relational time. Related theories that I am working on to discuss this are syntactogenerics and syntactogenesis, Syntacto generics and Semanto Generics, Syntactogenesis and Semantogenesis relations, and the nature of time as emminative, immanent and transcendent meaning both virtual and ontological. Please offer your input if you so wish.

What is time? How is time non linear? What are the relational or assemblages of subjective structure, how can we... more What is time? How is time non linear? What are the relational or assemblages of subjective structure, how can we create a taxonomy of types of relational time? By what features does time seem linear, and what is the nature of conditioning, or ritual space that instantiates regularities IN the mind? How is this relation both physical and immaterial? IS there such thing as the immaterial? Can time be said to be Immaterial and materializable? Is time instantiative or phasic, normative and bound to rules or flexible? How do we understand distinctions in subjective and objective time, how can we quantify and compare and contrast variables of each? Is there such thing as a phase shift in which ontological bias may be met with nomological or noumenal objectivity, if so what are the expectations, means of discernment and systems available to explore critique, modify and experiment with time relations? What, finally, are some means to codify and structure simulations of these relations utilizing electromagnetic fields that may interface with the Neural correlates of Consciousness study to explore results? What should our ethical considerations with regards to this sort of study be? How was your day?

"Between-Two: On the Borderline of Being & Time"

by Gregory Nixon

*Journal of Consciousness Exploration & Research* 2(2), March, 2011, pp. 150-164.

The purpose of this review article is to attempt to come to grips with the elusive vision of Gordon Globus, especially... more The purpose of this review article is to attempt to come to grips with the elusive vision of Gordon Globus, especially as revealed in this, his latest book. However, one can only grip that which is tangible and solid and Globus’s marriage of Heideggerian anti-concepts and “quantum neurophilosophy” seems purposefully to evade solidity or grasp. This slippery anti-metaphysics is sometimes a curse for the reader seeking imagistic or conceptual clarity, but, on the other hand, it is also the blessing that allows Globus to go far beyond (or deep within) the usual narrative explanations at the frontiers of physics, even that of the quantum variety.

Realitivistic Relativity 2.0

by Robert L. DeMelo

published in 'NPA-18 conference proceeding', 2010

This work introduces an alternative theoretical framework to Einstein’s SRT. It is a velocity dependent relativity... more This work introduces an alternative theoretical framework to Einstein’s SRT. It is a velocity dependent relativity theory similar in respect to SRT with regards to length contraction, but significantly different in all other aspects. It includes size scaling dependent on velocity and a Universal static frame of reference. It details that star and atomic systems are the same thing at two different points on the velocity spectrum, where star systems exist at low velocities and atomic systems exist at high velocities near and at the speed of light, and that our Solar System is a celestial Beryllium atom. The mathematical observations detailed in this work are beyond doubt extremely interesting. It mathematically derives the elementary charge 1.6022E(−19) and also derives Avogadro’s constant 6.022E(−23). The observations show that mass and charge are the same thing at two different points on the velocity spectrum, that gas-giant planets in the outer system have a direct scale relationship to electrons, that rock planets in the inner system are directly related to neutrons, that the star itself is related to protons and that asteroids are related to photons. This radical, simple and highly intuitive work maps celestial objects to their quantum counter-parts mathematically with extraordinary accuracy.

Universe Without Singularities. A Group Approach to De Sitter Cosmology

by Ignazio Licata

The Archaic Universe: Big Bang, Cosmological Term and the Quantum Origin of Time In Projective Cosmology

by Ignazio Licata