The Interactive Dimension of Communication: The Pragmatics of the Palo Alto Group
Published in the Journal for Communication and Culture 1, no. 2 (winter 2011): 4-19 (with Codruta Porcar)
Our paper proposes to analyze from a semiotic perspective the process of communication, as conceived within the Palo... more Our paper proposes to analyze from a semiotic perspective the process of communication, as conceived within the Palo Alto Group. We will firstly show that, as a result of the Group‟s critiques and revisions of the linear or mechanistic theories of communication, new perspectives are brought about for the essential axes of transformation within communication: we do not communicate as from a distinct atom to another, through an isolated channel, but through parts which are equal to the whole, the whole itself being equal to the parts. This approach has been characterized as “organicist”, studying and understanding communication as a dynamic process where the relationship between the elements is of prime importance. Reciprocal inclusion replaces the discursive aspects of communication and expression replaces representation. The reference point is thus situated beyond the mechanical parts of a whole ready to be dis- and reassembled. We conclude that through this perspective on communication, the notion of interaction between partners and between codes becomes a capital one and that, in this point, semiotics intersects with disciplines such as conversational analysis and the ethnography of communication.
« The Art of Epochal Change » (2003)
by Michel Weber
« The Art of Epochal Change », in Franz Riffert and Michel Weber (eds.), Searching for New Contrasts. Whiteheadian Contributions to Contemporary Challenges in Neurophysiology, Psychology, Psychotherapy and the Philosophy of Mind (Whitehead Psychology Nexus Studies I), Frankfurt am Main, Peter Lang, 2003, pp. 252-281.
This paper argues that there is a possible cross-elucidation and reinforcement between the worldviews of Whitehead and... more This paper argues that there is a possible cross-elucidation and reinforcement between the worldviews of Whitehead and Watzlawick: Whitehead providing to Watzlawick a theoretic basis that seems as seducing—if not broader—as the one Watzlawick himself attempted to give to his claims; and Watzlawick giving to Whitehead practical consequences of his theory of novelty and societies, thereby asking for their inflexion.
14 views
Seen by:
