The Role of Empathy in Making Availability Judgments from Video and Silhouette Awareness Information
by Ehsan Baha
Ruyter, B.; Baha,S.E.; Pijl, M.; Markopoulos, P. (2011) The Role of Empathy in Making Availability Judgments from Video and Silhouette Awareness Information. The Ergonomics Open Journal, Vol. 4, 42-46.
This work has been a collaboration between:
* Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
* Philips Research Europe, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
This paper reports research concerning video media spaces for the home and specifically the extent to which different... more This paper reports research concerning video media spaces for the home and specifically the extent to which different approaches for video obfuscation can balance conflicting requirements for awareness between connected individuals and privacy. Different filtering techniques were compared regarding the ability of observers to make inferences regarding the observed, and with regards to the acceptability of being observed through such media. So far, related research has only considered individual differences between observers at a cursory level. We report on two experiments that evaluated whether people ability to empathize with others influences their ability to evaluate the availability of another person based on a video footage. We focused on supporting judgments of availability for communication comparing full video and on silhouette based obfuscation. The first experiment indicated a strong relation between empathy score and availability judgments. This effect was strongest for both males and females in the silhouette visualization condition. To further understand and confirm the effects found in this study, a second experiment involving more test participants and controlling for the correctness of availability judgments was conducted. Our findings suggest that empathetic skills specifically, and social cognition skills more generally, are critical factors for availability judgments.
Should children be seen and not heard? An examination of how children’s interruptions are treated in family therapy
(2006) Discourse Studies. 8 (4): 549-566.
This work adds to the growing literature on children’s talk and the extensive research on interruptions by combining... more This work adds to the growing literature on children’s talk and the extensive research on interruptions by combining the two. I investigate children in the institutional context of family therapy and their interactions with the parents and therapist. Drawing upon 22 hours of natural family therapy data and 4 families I use a discursive approach. I note that children are not attended to when they try to interrupt unless they persist and then the acknowledgement is negative. I show that when main topic is about extremes of behaviour the child’s none relevant interruption is ignored. There are occasions however when the child interrupts with a topic relevant issue and these are usually attended to. This research has wider implications for therapeutic practice and children’s role in therapy. There is a need for further study of children’s interruptive discourse practice as research in this area is limited.
What value is there in children’s talk?’ Investigating family therapist’s interruptions of parents and children during the therapeutic process.
Journal of Pragmatics. 40: 507-524. (2008)
In this paper, I explore the ways in which family therapists interrupt their clients during the process of therapy.... more In this paper, I explore the ways in which family therapists interrupt their clients during the process of therapy. Family therapy involves multi-party talk and allows for the possibility of overlapping speech, side conversations and interruptions. I focus here on speech acts that occur in the middle of another speaker’s turn and can be treated as an interruption. The family therapist interrupts the clients in different ways. When interrupting an adult/parent client the interruption is accompanied by politeness or an apology. When interrupting the children in the family, though, the interruptions are different. The family therapist makes no apology and does not orient to the speech act as being interruptive. Here, I investigate, through a discursive analysis, how these interruptions are constructed and treated.

