Grassroots AIDS Knowledge: Implications for the Boundaries of Science and Collective Action
by David Rier
D. Indyk and D. Rier, 1993. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 15:3-43.
{Reprinted in Doing Community-Based Research: A Reader; D. Murphy, M. Scammell, and R. Sclove (eds). Amherst, MA: The Loka Institute; 1997}.
Grassroots AIDS groups create, disseminate, and interpret knowledge. Their success in these new roles shows that:... more Grassroots AIDS groups create, disseminate, and interpret knowledge. Their success in these new roles shows that: traditional, top-down dissemination theories are inadequate; the debate over marginal innovation has defined marginality too simplistically; and the scientific journal is not the only source of scientific information. This, and "boundary work" by mainstream scientists, indicates that, despite problems, AIDS grassroots knowledge production challenges traditional definitions and boundaries of scientific work, offering a gateway to wider democratization of science. A resource mobilization approach is applied to assess whether the grassroots' AIDS knowledge production model can work for toxic exposures and women's health issues.
31 views
Seen by:244 views
Seen by:Not So 'Gay'After AllConstructing (Homo) Sexuality In AIDS Research In the South African Medical Journal, 1980 - 1990
Published in the _South African Historical Journal_, 60, 3, 2008, pp.477 — 499.
Throughout the 1980s, the medical narrative of AIDS was linked to sexuality – specifically homosexuality. The first... more
Throughout the 1980s, the medical narrative of AIDS was linked to sexuality – specifically homosexuality. The first article in the South African Medical Journal (SAMJ) to report on a rise in immune deficiency related deaths was titled ‘Immuniteitstekort en Homoseksualiteit’ (Immune Deficiency and Homosexuality)
The sexuality represented in the ‘objective’ scientific/ medical journal that the SAMJ claimed to be, referred to a constructed white, male homosexuality that was commonly contrasted to a constructed white, male heterosexuality (an absent referent) imbued and influenced by the conservative racial, moral, and gendered discourses of apartheid South Africa. In the ‘public’ forum of the SAMJ, some medical practitioners created a stereotype of ‘male homosexuality’, represented it as ‘abnormal’ and ‘promiscuous’, and constructed ‘the homosexual’ as an (unscientific) research category. The resultant discourse around AIDS categorised it primarily as a syndrome of the ‘deviant few’, rather than a shared public health problem. Examining the discourse around homosexuality allows a glimpse into the inherently subjective nature of scientific research. It also reveals the concerns, interests and beliefs of a specific group of medical professionals creating ‘scientific facts’, and divulges as much about constructions of ‘white’, male ‘heterosexuality’ as it does about ‘white’ male ‘homosexuality’.
The Church has AIDS: Towards a positive theology for an HIV+ Church
by Dion Forster
Forthcoming in The Epworth Review - the Journal of Methodist ecclesiology and mission Vol 1, No 2, (May, 2010:6-24)
The Church has AIDS. The question is, how should the Church respond to that reality? The theology written in the early... more The Church has AIDS. The question is, how should the Church respond to that reality? The theology written in the early days, when the world was still discovering the harsh truth of HIV/AIDS, was primarily negative. Most of the theology written about HIV/AIDS has tended to focus on how the virus was transmitted and on the lifestyles of those who contracted it. It has taken a significant amount of time for the Church to realize that the Church can not distance itself from HIV. If Christians really are the Body of Christ, and there are members of this body who are HIV+, then Christ is HIV+.

