The end of the old flesh: beastly bodily becomings as contemporary parable
by JD Taylor
Presented at "The End of..." Conference, University of Kent, 22 January 2012.
In 1981 Gilles Deleuze read in Francis Bacon's paintings a 'zone of the indiscernible' between man and animal. Bacon's... more
In 1981 Gilles Deleuze read in Francis Bacon's paintings a 'zone of the indiscernible' between man and animal. Bacon's figures spasm through their wounded architectures, screams erupting as destabilised bodies attempt to escape their figurations. This paper develops this zone of the indiscernible to explore how human flesh has become a medium for representations of the end. In David Cronenberg's Videodrome [1983], a dark psychological conspiracy places the flesh under suspicion of suggestible media-corruption, as Max Renn transcends to abstracted data by orgiastically abandoning the old flesh.
Against the knowing futurism of Videodrome, this paper compares Charles Burns' Black Hole comic-book series [1995-2005], which uses the grotesque contagious corruption of teenage flesh as a dark analogy for growing up and loss of innocence in the haunted spaces of late 20th century Americana. Overtly Freudian, the rich contrasts of Burns' work introduces the becoming-monstrous and the eruption of contagion which racks modern American anxieties about the ending of the human, most familiar in recent zombie narratives. Taking a parallel track, in both accounts beastly becomings are played out on the flesh to mark internal turmoil whilst offering two directions for a contemporary bestiary of our culture. Whilst Burns offers a pessimistic Quietism and submission to the mysterious disease, Cronenberg's narrative alternatively calls to end the old flesh and embrace the possibilities of cybertechnology. Baudrillardian pessimism is spliced with 'biopunk' subcultures alongside Eugene Thacker's theoretical forays into life as the 'unthinkable' (2010, 2011) to finally ascertain why anxieties over life, technology and the end continue to play on a corrupted flesh. Does power embody itself through a zombified life, or will the skin continue to subvert and revolt against human (and posthuman) machinations?
‘Triptychs, Eternity and the Spirituality of the Body’
Published in Deleuze Studies, Vol 3:1, October 2009
One of Deleuze’s ambitions in 'Francis Bacon: The Logic of Sensation' is to outline an experimental conceptual... more
One of Deleuze’s ambitions in 'Francis Bacon: The Logic of Sensation' is to outline an experimental conceptual analogue of Bacon's paintings that demonstrates a genuine fidelity to the specificity of his work. His book represents an attempt to produce a philosophy of painting where Bacon is conceived as one of the great painters of immanence, a painter of the body-without-organs. His figural paintings are understood to repeatedly explore the vital intensities and sensations associated with the dynamisms of becoming, processes of individuation and the destratification of the organism, subject and individual. Deleuze suggests that a brutal form of realism is manifested by Bacon’s art, but it is not a realism associated with the violence of appearance but a violence of sensation associated with a spiritual realism of the body. Bacon’s paintings depict, he claims, a visceral topography of embodied sensation that is profoundly non-representational and spiritual.
One of the most complex and creative sections of the book is his philosophical analysis of the triptychs. In just a few dense pages he arguably provides one of the most powerful accounts yet written about triptychs in relation to the questions of what they are, how they function, and what the operative principles governing their production are. In this paper I develop a reading of Deleuze’s philosophical understanding of the triptychs that incorporates his arguments regarding their non-narrative status within the claims he makes about their capacity to express a spiritual sensation of the eternity of time. I demonstrate that the notion of eternity being elicited from Bacon’s triptychs is largely derived from Spinoza’s Ethics, namely, the eternity of substance and the eternal cycles of becoming. However, in order to fully grasp the significance of Deleuze’s claims regarding the eternal time of triptychs it is necessary to re-examine his initial analysis of classic religious painting which forms much of the context for his argument. Despite the fact that religious art still labours under the auspices of obvious narrative content, Deleuze will claim that it is still capable of conveying intense spiritual sensations associated with the celestial and abstract realm. Once we develop an understanding of how this was achieved in the past, the significance of Bacon’s liberation from the constraints of narrative has upon his ability to embody a Spinozistic sense of eternity within the mechanism of triptychs can be explored.
‘Gilles Deleuze’s Francis Bacon: The Logic of Sensation'
Review article published in Pli: Warwick Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 14, Winter 2003
When considered together the seventeen rubrics which make up the content of this 1981 book by Gilles Deleuze are... more When considered together the seventeen rubrics which make up the content of this 1981 book by Gilles Deleuze are intended to function as an account of a general ‘logic of sensation’ associated with a very specific task for painting. To grasp this logic of sensation in painting, it is necessary to inquire into the nature of the painterly task which functions as the operative presupposition of Deleuze’s Logic of Sensation. Deleuze’s account of this painterly task is explicitly mediated through the specificity of Bacon’s own response as a painter, and is articulated by Deleuze as that route in painting that is concerned with elaborating ‘haptic space’. Haptic space, for Deleuze, is neither a manual space opposed to a purely optical space of vision, nor is it a purely tactile space connected to the optical. It is rather a distinct kind of space that competes with optical space. This route would seem to indicate that painting itself should not be understood as the effort to merely perfect the representation or reproduction of visible forms. Such a notion of perfection would merely serve to impose linearity upon the historical development of painting and restrict what painting is actually able to achieve.

