Does incentive provision increase the quality of peer review? An experimental study
"Research Policy" 2012, In Press
Although peer review is crucial for innovation and experimental discoveries in science, it is poorly understood in... more Although peer review is crucial for innovation and experimental discoveries in science, it is poorly understood in scientific terms. Discovering its true dynamics and exploring adjustments which improve the commitment of everyone involved could benefit scientific development for all disciplines and consequently increase innovation in the economy and the society. We have reported the results of an innovative experiment developed to model peer review. We demonstrate that offering material rewards to referees tends to decrease the quality and efficiency of the reviewing process. Our findings help to discuss the viability of different options of incentive provision, supporting the idea that journal editors and responsible of research funding agencies should be extremely careful in offering material incentives on reviewing, since these might undermine moral motives which guide referees’ behavior.
Personal identity: A theoretical and experimental analysis
Co-authored with Pablo Brañas, María Paz Espinosa, and Luis Miller; published in `Journal of Economic Methodology´, 2010.
This paper aims to analyze the role of personal identity in altruism. To this end, it starts by reviewing critically... more
This paper aims to analyze the role of personal identity in altruism. To this end, it starts by reviewing critically the growing literature on economics and identity. Considering the ambiguities that the concept of social identity poses, our proposal focuses on the concept of personal identity. A formal model to study how personal identity enters in individuals’ utility function when facing a dictator game decision is then presented.
Finally, this ‘identity-based’ utility function is studied experimentally. The experiment allows us to study the main parameters of the model, suggesting that we should move
with caution when attributing identities to individuals.
Does incentive provision increase the quality of peer review? An experimental study
Authors: Flaminio Squazzoni, Giangiacomo Bravo, Károly Takács
Forthcoming in Research Policy
Although peer review is crucial for innovation and experimental discoveries in science, it is poorly understood in... more Although peer review is crucial for innovation and experimental discoveries in science, it is poorly understood in scientific terms. Discovering its true dynamics and exploring adjustments which improve the commitment of everyone involved could benefit scientific development for all disciplines and consequently increase innovation in the economy and the society. We have reported the results of an innovative experiment developed to model peer review. We demonstrate that offering material rewards to referees tends to decrease the quality and efficiency of the reviewing process. Our findings help to discuss the viability of different options of incentive provision, supporting the idea that journal editors and responsible of research funding agencies should be extremely careful in offering material incentives on reviewing, since these might undermine moral motives which guide referees' behavior.
"Economía psicológica"
by Vicente Caballero de la Torre
Downloads from E-Prints (UCM):
http://eprints.ucm.es/est/index.php?action=show_detail_eprint;id=8511
Robles Rodríguez, Francisco José y Caballero de la Torre, Vicente (2009) Economía Psicológica. In Diccionario crítico de ciencias Sociales. Plaza y Valdés, Madrid-México. IISBN: 978-84-96780-14-9
Sección de libro (book chapter)
Key words:
Gabriel Tarde, Daniel Kahneman, Prospect theory
Sección de libro (book chapter)
Key words:
Gabriel Tarde, Daniel Kahneman, Prospect theory
2 views
Seen by:Trust and partner selection in social networks: An experimentally grounded model
Social Networks, 2012 in Press
This article investigates the importance of the endogenous selection of partners for trust and cooperation in market... more
This article investigates the importance of the endogenous selection of partners for trust and cooperation in market exchange situations, where there is information asymmetry between investors and trustees. We created an experimental-data driven agent-based model where the endogenous link between interaction outcome and social structure formation was examined starting from heterogeneous agent behaviour. By testing various social structure configurations, we showed that dynamic networks lead to more cooperation when agents can create more links and reduce exploitation opportunities by free riders. Furthermore, we found that the endogenous network formation was more important for cooperation than the type of network. Our results cast serious doubt about the static view of network structures on cooperation and
can provide new insights into market efficiency.
