Applying Cognitive Linguistics to Instructed L2 Learning: The English Modals
Tyler, A., Mueller, C. M., Ho, V. (2010). Applying cognitive linguistics to instructed L2 learning: The English modals. AILA Review, 23, 30-49.
This paper reports the results of a quasi-experimental effects-of-instruction study examining the efficacy of applying... more This paper reports the results of a quasi-experimental effects-of-instruction study examining the efficacy of applying a Cognitive Linguistic (CL) approach to L2 learning of the semantics of English modals. In spite of their frequency in typical input, modal verbs present L2 learners with difficulties, partly due to their inherent complexity — modals typically have two divergent senses — a root sense and an epistemic sense. ELT textbooks and most grammar books aimed at L2 teachers present the two meanings as homophones, failing to address any systematic semantic patterning in the modal system as a whole. Additionally, ELT texts tend to present modals from a speech act perspective. In contrast, CL analyses (e. g., Langacker 1991; Nuyts 2001; Sweetser 1990; Talmy 1988) offer both a systematic, motivated representation of the relationship between the root and epistemic meanings and a rather precise representation of the semantics of each modal. To test the pedagogical effectiveness of a CL account of modals, an effects-of-instruction study was conducted with three groups of adult, high-intermediate ESL learners: a Cognitive treatment group, a Speech Acts treatment group, and a Control group. Results of an ANCOVA indicated that the Cognitive treatment group demonstrated significantly more improvement than the Speech Acts treatment group. The experiment thus lends empirical support for the position that CL, in addition to offering a compelling analytical account of language, may also provide the basis for more effective grammar instruction than that found in most current ELT teaching materials.
Modality and the English Modal Verb System
Unpublished draft
To analyze the modality of the English modal verb system requires an understanding of the modality of the English... more To analyze the modality of the English modal verb system requires an understanding of the modality of the English language. All verb phrases in which a modal verb occupies the initial position express the irrealis modality of the subjunctive mood. The initial modal verb also expresses one of four modalities: epistemic, deontic, dynamic, and evidential. Verb phrases that contain a multiple modal express both epistemic modality (the initial modal verb) and deontic modality (the second and subsequent modal verb[s]). Although some linguists and logicians argue for an alternative description of modality, the analysis offered by Palmer best accounts for the modality expressed by modal verbs and the Modern English verb system in general.
Multiple Modals in Modern English: Use, History, and Structure of Periphrastic Modal Verbs
unpublished draft
Modal verbs are auxiliary verbs that express modality—the expression of possibility, necessity, permissibility, and... more Modal verbs are auxiliary verbs that express modality—the expression of possibility, necessity, permissibility, and contingency—in English. Multiple modals (double modals, triple modals) are periphrastic verb constructions characterized by the use of two or more modal verbs within a single verb phrase as in might could and used to could. Native speakers of many varieties of English including South Midland and Southern American Englishes, Northern British Englishes, Scottish Englishes, Irish Englishes, and Caribbean Englishes regularly use at least one multiple modal occasionally, particularly in facesaving contexts. First appearing in the English language approximately eight hundred years ago, multiple modals in Modern English most likely developed from Old English and subsequently Middle English modal constructions. Immigrants from Scotland and Northern England, in particular, influenced the spread of multiple modals to North America and the Caribbean during the late seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Although traditional linguistic analyses including the phrase-structure rule approach and the subcategorization approach allow for multiple modals provided that one modal is a full verb with a base form, multiple modals are not phrases generated by a syntactic rule but rather periphrastic verb forms similar to phrasal verbs, noun compounds, and other periphrastic idioms. The argument for multiple modals as single lexical items is supported by the syntactic and semantic restrictions on multiple modal constructions including the limited number of naturally occurring combinations.
