Competitiveness (Economics)

OECD Ülkelerinin Rekabet Gücünü Açıklayıcı Kurumsal ve Karma Modeller

by Seyit Muharrem GÖKMENOĞLU

Prof.Dr. Mustafa AKAL ve Yrd.Doç.Dr. Ali KABASAKAL ile birlikte hazırlanan makale Business and Economics Research Journal' de yayınlanmıştır.

Bu çalışmanın amacı OECD ülkelerinin rekabet gücünü kurumsal ve karma modeller geliştirerek açıklamaktır. Modellerde... more Bu çalışmanın amacı OECD ülkelerinin rekabet gücünü kurumsal ve karma modeller geliştirerek açıklamaktır. Modellerde 2008 küresel krizin etkilerinden kaçınmak maksadıyla 2007 yılına ait veriler kullanılmıştır. Tahminler sonucunda, bazı kuruluşlar tarafından ülkelerin kurumsal, politik ve sosyo-ekonomik yapılarını ortaya koymak maksadıyla oluşturulan göstergeleri dikkate alarak geliştirilen kurumsal modellerin işlevsel olduğu bulunmuştur. WEF rekabet gücü göstergesine dayalı kurumsal modellerin rekabet gücünü %47 ila %56 arası, IMD rekabet gücü göstergesine dayalı kurumsal modellerin rekabet gücünü %74 ila %84 arasında açıkladığı bulunmuştur. Teorik değişkenlerin de ilave edilerek kurulan karma modeller, kurumsal modellerin açıklama gücünü artırmış, karma modellerin rekabeti açıklayıcı gücü %63 ila %90 arasında olduğu bulunmuştur.

OECD Ülkelerinde Rekabet Gücünün Nedensellik İlişkisi: Ampirik Bir Analiz

by Seyit Muharrem GÖKMENOĞLU

Prof.Dr.Mustafa AKAL ile birlikte hazırladığımız makale TİSK Akademi Dergisinde yayımlanmıştır.

Çalışmada dış ticaret ve rekabet gücü teorisyenlerinin ileri sürdüğü ulusal rekabet gücünü belirleyici bazı faktörler... more Çalışmada dış ticaret ve rekabet gücü teorisyenlerinin ileri sürdüğü ulusal rekabet gücünü belirleyici bazı faktörler ile OECD Sekreteryası tarafından yayınlanan ulusal rekabet gücü göstergesi arasındaki nedensellik iliflkisinin yönünü tahmin etmek maksadıyla analiz için yeterli verileri temin edilebilen her bir OECD ülkesi için Granger Nedensellik Testleri uygulanmış ve bu testlerin sonuçları değerlendirilmiştir. Bahse konu testler neticesinde analize konu olan çoğu faktörün OECD ülkelerinde genel olarak rekabet gücüne neden olduğu tespit edilmesine karşın bazı parametreler için teorik beklentilerin aksini gösteren sonuçların ortaya çıktığı görülmüştür. Bu şekilde tezat bir ilişkinin mevcudiyetinin ulusal rekabet gücünün tüketici fiyatlarına dayalı reel efektif döviz kuru gibi kısıtlı bir göstergeye indirgenemeyecek kadar karmaşık bir kavram olmasından kaynaklandığı değerlendirilmiştir.

The mask of the symptoms

by Marcelo Manucci

The gap between environmental demands and the ability to adapt and respond generates symptoms in a human system. In a... more The gap between environmental demands and the ability to adapt and respond generates symptoms in a human system. In a system that has lost its ability to make decisions, the symptom decides for the system. In general terms, the masks have the function to hide some features while others becoming visible. Thus, masks are functional elements for interaction. The game of hide and show is only feasible in a wider context of significance. Without context, masks are worthless.

ICTs and Innovation

by Jeffrey Hart

written for inclusion in a booklet circulated by the G8 center prior to the Camp David Economic Summit (2012)

Le piattaforme logistiche come strumento di competitività del territorio

by marcucci edoardo

Technological Capacity as Fitness: An Evolutionary Model of Change in the International Political Economy

by Jeffrey Hart

published in William R. Thompson, (ed.), Evolutionary Interpretations of
World Politics (New York: Routledge, 2001).

The resurgence of U.S. international competitiveness on the basis of its relative strength in the new leading... more
The resurgence of U.S. international competitiveness on the basis of its relative strength in the new leading sectors – computers and other information industries – has brought about a debate on adopting the U.S. model of business and industrial institutions
among firms and governments in other countries.  The United States is currently the most successful country in the world in adjusting to the so-called Information Revolution.  The existence (or creation) of appropriate governance structures – industrial structures,
government policies and institutions, and other institutional environments – explains the U.S. success in the computer and other information industries.

Explaining the Resurgence of US Competitiveness: the Rise of Wintelism

by Jeffrey Hart

(with Sangbae Kim) The Information Society, 18 (February 2002), 1-12.

A new regional competitiveness index: theory, methods and findings

by Kornelia Kozovska

Co-authored with P.Annoni and L.Dijkstra, Working Paper, Directorate-General for Regional Policy, European Commission

The Concept of Competitiveness in the Area of Tourism Destinations

by Sadegh Rast

Prepare for transformation

by Marcelo Manucci

The concern to keep levels of economic performance maintaining personal well-being conditions is a topic of major... more The concern to keep levels of economic performance maintaining personal well-being conditions is a topic of major interest in most organizations under the current conditions of life context and the demands of production. On the one hand, it is clear the limit of growth rates in many manufacturing sectors in all regions of the world. Furthermore, due to global interdependence the instability is present in all levels of decision.

Реализация принципа пропорциональности в конкурентом праве

by Bronislav Totskyi

Опубликовано: Евразийский юридический журнал №6 (37) 2011 – с.127-130

The Politics of Global Competition in the Telecommunications Industry

by Jeffrey Hart

published in The Information Society, 5 (1988), 169-201.

Politics of Global Competition in the Semiconductor Industry

by Jeffrey Hart

published in Pacific Focus, 1 (Fall 1986), 93-119.

Auction theory: bidder's perspective in a public out-cry English auction

by Jagannath Aryal

National Champions

by Jeffrey Hart

published in R.J.Barry Jones (ed.), Encyclopedia of International Political Economy (London: Routledge, 2001).

Industry Creation and the New Geography of Innovation: The Case of Flat Panel Displays

by Jeffrey Hart

with Thomas P. Murtha and Stefanie Ann Lenway, in Martin Kenney and Richard Florida (eds.), Locating Global Advantage: Industry Dynamics in the International Economy (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2004).

Can Industrial Policy be Good Policy?

by Jeffrey Hart

published in Douglas Nelson (ed.), The Political Economy of Policy Reform: Essays in Honor of J. Michael Finger (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2005).

Flat Panel Displays

by Jeffrey Hart

published in Jeffrey T. Macher and David C. Mowery (eds.), Running Faster to Keep Up: Prospering in Global Innovation Networks (Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2008).

Globalization's Impact on High-Tech Industries in the United States

by Jeffrey Hart

published in Beverly Crawford and Edward Fogarty (eds.), The Impact of Globalization on the United States: Volume 3 Business and Economics (Westport, Conn.: Praeger, 2008).

Globalization and National Innovation Policies: A Co-Evolutionary Approach

by Jeffrey Hart

in Kenneth Rogerson (ed.), The American Footprint: The Impact of U.S. Technology and Technology Policy on the World (London: Palgrave, forthcoming).

It is tempting to think of competition in high technology industries as a race to the finish line with governments... more It is tempting to think of competition in high technology industries as a race to the finish line with governments jockeying for position via well chosen industrial policies.  A more accurate way of thinking about competition in high technology is to see governmental policies and industrial strategies as gradually co-evolving so that there is a better fit between what governments do and firms need for general prosperity.  In this chapter, I compare the horse-race model to the co-evolutionary model. I use the examples of the rollout of broadband telecommunications services and the rise of biotechnology (and other high-tech competitions) to demonstrate the superiority of the latter.