Behavioural Behavioral Ecology (in Biology)

Changing colony growth rates in Camponotus floridanus as a behavioral response to conspecific presence (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

by prassede calabi

Sexual differences in food re-caching by New Zealand robins

by Jayden van Horik

Burns, K.C & van Horik, J. 2007. Sexual differences in food re-caching by New Zealand robins (Petroica australis). Journal of Avian Biology. Vol. 38 (3): 394–398.

Embryonic Origin of Mate Choice In a Lizard With Temperature-Dependent Sex Determination

by Oliver Putz

O. Putz and D. Crews; Developmental Psychobiology 48, no. 1: 29-38, 2006

Individual differences in the adult sexual behavior of vertebrates are rooted in the fetal environment. In the leopard... more Individual differences in the adult sexual behavior of vertebrates are rooted in the fetal environment. In the leopard gecko (Eublepharis macularius), a species with temperature-dependent sex determination (TSD), hatchling sex ratios differ between incubation temperatures, as does sexuality in same-sex animals. This variation can primarily be ascribed to the temperature having direct organizing actions on the brain. Here we demonstrate that embryonic temperature can affect adult mate choice in the leopard gecko. Given the simultaneous choice between two females from different incubation temperatures (30.0 and 34.0
C), males from one incubation temperature (30.0
C) preferred the female from 34.0
C, while males from another incubation temperature (32.5
C) preferred the female from 30.0
C.We suggest that this difference in mate choice is due to an environmental influence on brain development leading to differential perception of opposite-sex individuals. This previously unrecognized modulator of adult mate choice lends further support to the view that mate choice is best understood in the context of an individual’s entire life-history. Thus, sexual selection results from a combination of the female’s as well as the male’s life history. Female attractiveness and male choice therefore are complementary.

A scientific note: Foragers deposit attractive scent marks in a stingless bee that does not communicate food location

by Elinor Lichtenberg

Behavioral suites mediate group-level foraging dynamics in communities of tropical stingless bees

by Elinor Lichtenberg

Open Access

Competition for floral resources is a key force shaping pollinator communities, particularly among social bees. The... more Competition for floral resources is a key force shaping pollinator communities, particularly among social bees. The ability of social bees to recruit nestmates for group foraging is hypothesized to be a major factor in their ability to dominate rich resources such as mass-flowering trees. We tested the role of group foraging in attaining dominance by stingless bees, eusocial tropical pollinators that exhibit high diversity in foraging strategies. We provide the first experimental evidence that meliponine group foraging strategies, large colony sizes and aggressive behavior form a suite of traits that enable colonies to improve dominance of rich resources. Using a diverse assemblage of Brazilian stingless bee species and an array of artificial "flowers" that provided a sucrose reward, we compared species' dominance and visitation under unrestricted foraging conditions and with experimental removal of group-foraging species. Dominance does not vary with individual body size, but rather with foraging group size. Species that recruit larger numbers of nestmates (Scaptotrigona aff. depilis, Trigona hyalinata, Trigona spinipes) dominated both numerically (high local abundance) and behaviorally (controlling feeders). Removal of group-foraging species increased feeding opportunities for solitary foragers (Frieseomelitta varia, Melipona quadrifasciata and Nannotrigona testaceicornis). Trigona hyalinata always dominated under unrestricted conditions. When this species was removed, T. spinipes or S. aff. depilis controlled feeders and limited visitation by solitary-foraging species. Because bee foraging patterns determine plant pollination success, understanding the forces that shape these patterns is crucial to ensuring pollination of both crops and natural areas in the face of current pollinator declines.

Olfactory eavesdropping between two competing stingless bee species

by Elinor Lichtenberg

(The first Supplemental video takes a few seconds to load.)

Foragers can improve search efficiency, and ultimately fitness, by using social information: cues and signals produced... more Foragers can improve search efficiency, and ultimately fitness, by using social information: cues and signals produced by other animals that indicate food location or quality. Social information use has been well studied in predator–prey systems, but its functioning within a trophic level remains poorly understood. Eavesdropping, use of signals by unintended recipients, is of particular interest because eavesdroppers may exert selective pressure on signaling systems. We provide the most complete study to date of eavesdropping between two competing social insect species by determining the glandular source and composition of a recruitment pheromone, and by examining reciprocal heterospecific responses to this signal. We tested eavesdropping between Trigona hyalinata and Trigona spinipes, two stingless bee species that compete for floral resources, exhibit a clear dominance hierarchy and recruit nestmates to high-quality food sources via pheromone trails. Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry of T. hyalinata recruitment pheromone revealed six carboxylic esters, the most common of which is octyl octanoate, the major component of T. spinipes recruitment pheromone. We demonstrate heterospecific detection of recruitment pheromones, which can influence heterospecific and conspecific scout orientation. Unexpectedly, the dominant T. hyalinata avoided T. spinipes pheromone in preference tests, while the subordinate T. spinipes showed neither attraction to nor avoidance of T. hyalinata pheromone. We suggest that stingless bees may seek to avoid conflict through their eavesdropping behavior, incorporating expected costs associated with a choice into the decision-making process.