ETHNOMUSICKING: A VALUED MUSIC OCCUPATION OR AUDACIOUS ANTICS IN THE PURGA MUSIC MUSEUM

by Sandra Kirkwood

This paper appears was delivered at the Cultural Diversity in Music Education Conference held at the Sydney Conservatorium of Music on 11 January, 2010. It appears in the Conference Proceedings -- peer reviewed and accepted for publication 31 October, 2009.

Music history research of Indigenous and Scottish groups in Ipswich, Australia, reveals that people have had varying... more

Download (.pdf) (212kb) Quick view

Teaching Music and Dance of Namibia

by David Hebert

Hebert, D. G. (2006). Teaching Music and Dance of Namibia: A Review Essay. International Journal of Education and the Arts, Vol. 7 [http://www.ijea.org/v7r1/index.html].

Book Review and Interview Essay

Doing, being and becoming more active through playing part in community-based museum scenarios

by Sandra Kirkwood

The concept of occupational performance can be applied to museums in regard to how we synthesise relationships between... more

Special Issue on Popular Music Pedagogy, Journal of Popular Music Studies

by Susan Oehler Herrick

Susan Oehler, co-guest editor with Jason Hanley. Peer-reviewed journal of the International Association for the Study of Popular Music-US Branch. Issue 21, No. 1. 2009.
Note: I published as Susan E. Oehler through 2009.

Ethnomusicology as tool for the Christian Missionary (aka Ethnomusicology's Missionary Position)

by John Vallier

Vallier, John Bellarmine. 2003. "Ethnomusicology as Tool for the Christian Missionary". European Meetings in Ethnomusicology. 10: 85-97.

I originally presented this paper at the 46th Meeting of the Society for Ethnomusicology (SEM): Detroit, MI. October 27, 2001.

Music has an impressive capacity to influence human behavior. From jingles marketing the consumption of goods and... more

Reply to Schrag-Coulter's Response

by John Vallier

This is my reply to Coulter and Schrag's response to my paper, "Ethnomusicology As Tool For the Christian" (presented @ SEM in 2001 & published in EME in 2003). Writing a reply to their response was complicated by the fact that I received two different versions of their response. Both versions included many of the same criticism of my paper, but they differed in one significant way: the first unpublished response included the following honest description of their motivation, while the second published response did not:

"We are, first and foremost, followers of Jesus Christ.  We believe that God created musical and social diversity around the world that is stupefying in its beauty and creative genius.  We also believe that God wants–even requires–all people to create for him, acknowledging him as their ultimate source.  Approaches, ideas, and methodologies in the field of ethnomusicology help us to understand, appreciate, and respect the musical cultures in which we work, but that does not mean we uncritically accept the ethical values of everyone around us as equally valid" (Coulter and Shcrag, unpublished version, 2003).

Not only did the second published response not include this admission, it also excluded the statement that the ethnomusicianary “fight is … against Satan and all evil, which ultimately is for the benefit of all people and cultures.” In the second published version, the authors sidestepped any discussion of  “winning the lost” and instead focused exclusively on the practice of encouraging the development of indigenous hymnody among existing churches. Though I was concerned with the theosophical nature of these statements in their first response, I did respect their candor. I also believed these statements to be essential in understanding the ethnomusicianary: viewed in this context, it is clear that any professional code of ethics becomes subservient to a bulwark of moral certitude.

Unfortunately, the co-authors’ honest self-portrayal was replaced by, among other things, a diversionary accusation that my paper re-examined charges already explored in the field of anthropology and with a curious analogy between the activities of missionaries and the experience of 1960s blues revivalists. They also criticized me for not interviewing any of the ethnomusicianaries I cited: “insight from even a single interview would have helped the paper immensely” (Schrag and Coulter 2003). In an effort to address this criticism, I applied for and attained special funding from the Librarians Association of the University of California (LAUC) to travel to, attend, and speak with ethnomusicianaries at the 2003 Global Consultation on Music and Missions Conference (GCOMM): http://www.gcommhome.org. Since I was unable to find a way to register for the conference, I called one of the co-authors and asked for instructions on how to accomplish this. These efforts were met with resistance. I was told that I was “immoral” and that the GCOMM participants—to put it mildly—would not welcome me. I canceled my trip and returned the funding.

I was asked by the EME editor not to refer to the co-authors' unpublished version in my response.

x

Log In

or reset password

Need an account? Click here to sign up

Reset Password

Enter the email address you signed up with, and we'll send a reset password email to that address

Academia © 2012