2 views
Seen by:4 views
Seen by:The Politics of Pity: Domesticating Loss in a Russian Province
by Serguei Alex. Oushakine (Сергей Ушакин)
in American Anthropologist. Vol. 108, No. 2 (2006): 297-311.
23 views
Seen by: and 2 moreGender Ideology and Turkish Nationalisms
by Karl Griggs
A general overview of the development of modern Turkish nationalism from Ottomanism and its fundamental intersection with gender identities. In this paper, I challenge the seemingly ubiquitous assumptions about the links between 'secularity' and women's rights, and the inverse association of 'Islamism' with oppression.
Gender Ideology and Turkish Nationalisms
by Karl Griggs
A general overview of the development of modern Turkish nationalism from Ottomanism and its fundamental intersection with gender identities. In this paper, I challenge the seemingly ubiquitous assumptions about the links between 'secularity' and women's rights, and the inverse association of 'Islamism' with oppression.
30 views
Seen by: and 8 moreDíaz-Andreu, M. 2005. Género y Arqueología: una nueva síntesis. In Sánchez Romero, M. (ed.) Arqueología y Género. Monografías de Arte y Arqueología nº 64. Granada, Universidad de Granada: 13-51.
En estos últimos años los estudios de género se han convertido en uno de los principales campos de investigación en la... more
En estos últimos años los estudios de género se han convertido en uno de los principales campos de investigación en la arqueología anglosajona, aunque su influencia ciertamente se ha venido extendiendo ininterrumpidamente a otros países de fuera de este área.
SECCIONES
- De mujer a género: hacia una arqueología postprocesual
- La crítica al sesgo androcéntrico: lenguaje, imágenes,
museos y enseñanza
- La identidad de género como multidimensional y
diversa
- El género en las actividades de subsistencia y de
producción
- El género y la cultura material
- El género en el paisaje de los vivos y de los muertos
- Género y poder
- Conclusiones
2012 (Gil J. Stein) “Food Preparation, Social Context, and Ethnicity in a Prehistoric Mesopotamian Colony” Pp 47-63 in: The Menial Art of Cooking: Archaeological Studies of Cooking and Food Preparation, edited by Sarah R. Graff and Enrique Rodriguez-Alegria. University Press of Colorado, Boulder, CO.
by Gil Stein
This chapter uses food preparation and consumption as a way to examine ethnicity and inter-cultural power relations in... more
This chapter uses food preparation and consumption as a way to examine ethnicity and inter-cultural power relations in the worlds earliest known colonial network – that established by Mesopotamia in its surrounding regions during the Uruk period (ca. 3700-3100 BC). Food preparation and consumption often occur in different social contexts, roughly corresponding to the contrast between the domestic and more public or socially inclusive spheres. For this reason, these two activities can reflect different context-dependent assertions of social identity (gender, class, ethnicity) and different degrees of consciousness in practice (habitus vs. intentional symbolic statements). As recent analyses by New World historical archaeologists have shown, these contrasts can be especially marked in multi-ethnic culture contact situations, especially those involving cross-cultural marriage in colonial encounters.
Excavations at the site of Hacınebi along the Euphrates valley trade route in southeast Turkey. Excavations indicate that in the mid fourth millennium BC, the earliest state societies of the Uruk culture in southern Mesopotamia established a trading enclave in the midst of this local Anatolian settlement. The Uruk enclave at Hacnebi forms part of the broader phenomenon called the “Uruk expansion” – the world’s earliest known colonial network. The organization of economic, social, and political relations between Uruk settlements and local communities in the Uruk expansion remains a hotly debated topic. Evidence for long term peaceful co-existence of Mesopotamians and Anatolians at Hacınebi suggests that social and economic relations were based on strategies of alliance rather than colonialist domination. In this paper I compare several aspects of food preparation (food choice, butchery, cooking practices and cooking vessels) with the social context of food consumption. Artifacts from the more domestic social context of food preparation are strongly Anatolian in style, while those from more public contexts of consumption are predominantly of Uruk Mesopotamian styles. Significantly, local Anatolian cooking pot styles predominate even in archaeological contexts that are otherwise overwhelmingly Uruk Mesopotamian in character. The evidence is consistent with the interpretation of gendered ethnic differences between the social arenas of food preparation and consumption. I suggest that the Mesopotamian colonists at Hacınebi forged marriage alliances with local elites, forming multi-cultural households composed of Uruk males and Anatolian females.
Seelentag - Biene oder Borstenschwein? Lebenswelt und Sinn des ‘Weiberiambos’ (Semonides frg. 7D)
submitted
I try to show that the world depicted in works like Semonides' “On the Origin of the Female Species” and Hesiod's... more I try to show that the world depicted in works like Semonides' “On the Origin of the Female Species” and Hesiod's “Works and Days”, its values and norms are reflections of a traditional peasant farmer society, of a certain ‘life-world’ with a particular set of norms and values. In this context misogyny had a very specific social function. Further, I offer a tentative exploration into the origins of the iambic genre.
SPACE, POSITION AND IMPERIALISM IN SOUTH TEXAS
by MARGO TAMEZ
In, Chicana/Latina Studies, 7:2, Spring 2008
15 views
Seen by:
