High Medieval Archaeology
20 Followers
Recent papers in High Medieval Archaeology
The Zítkov castle (Pardubice Region, Czech Republic) near Choceň was investigated by means of metal detection in 2007–2011. The research was led by the archaeologist of the Regional Museum in Vysoké Mýto and focused on surface layers... more
The Zítkov castle (Pardubice Region, Czech Republic) near Choceň was investigated by means of metal detection in 2007–2011. The research was led by the archaeologist of the Regional Museum in Vysoké Mýto and focused on surface layers endangered by the illicit use of the metal detecting technology. The collection of finds illustrates life in the castle, mainly in the later 14th century and the early 15th century when the castle was besieged. Traces of unknown activities from the 13th century were detected as well.
The newly-discovered prehistoric and High Medieval settlements at Podrečje near Vir were located in the southern part of the Kamniška Bistrica lowlands or, in the broader sense, on the north-eastern edge of the Ljubljana basin. The... more
The newly-discovered prehistoric and High Medieval settlements at Podrečje near Vir were located in the southern part of the Kamniška Bistrica lowlands or, in the broader sense, on the north-eastern edge of the Ljubljana basin. The settlements were situated in the lowland basin, which was formed by the Pleistocene and Holocene fluvial deposits of the Kamniška Bistrica river.
Eight dwelling structures in sector I (Houses 1−8) were classified into the prehistoric settlement phase (Ist settlement phase). They formed two groups, which were separated by two ditches (Ditches 1 and 2). These were most probably drainage ditches, which were associated with Houses 6 and 8. Houses 6, 7, and 5, north of the above mentioned ditches, were bounded on the west by an enclosure fence. No fence was discovered to the south of the group of dwelling structures to the south of the two ditches. The buildings stood a few metres from each other and were built of with upright load-bearing posts. They most probably had compacted clay (cob) walls (elements of which were not preserved). The dimensions of these structures varied between 7 and 14 m in length and between 5 and 7m in width. House 2 stood out in terms of floor plan and dimensions. The surviving features suggest that the settlement extended to the west and east. The remains of the prehistoric settlement are dated to the period from the late Middle Bronze Age to the end of the Late Bronze Age in sector I. However the material from sector II suggests that the foundation of the settlement may be dated to as early as early mid Bonze Age. However, we need to emphasize that this date is based on an extremely modest assemblage of sherds representing 25 vessels (assemblage G1−25).
Taking into account the fact that remains of High Medieval pottery appeared only sporadically in sector I and based on the substantial High Medieval occupation layer (Context no. 4) and remains of three partially extant dwelling structures in sector II, there is incontrovertible evidence for the existence of a settlement or hamlet in the central part of sector II (settlement phase II). The best preserved dwelling structure was House 10, which had the remains of a hearth (probably of the open type) in the south-western part of the structure. The remains of other two dwelling structures were also recorded. House 9 was located in the extreme eastern part of the excavated area, whilst House 11, was represented by a mere three postholes, which were recorded in Section 1. These dwelling structures and a dense concentration of pottery in the area 10 m to the east of House 11 are proof that the settlement extended to the west and to the east of the excavated area. Štular states, that the period from the 8th to the 12th Century was a phase of fortified central settlements and undefended rural settlements from the perspective of settlement archaeology. These structures might represent log cabin type structures with an area of between 16 to 25m2, which would have been adapted to the micro location and environment (Štular 2001, 71, 72). The settlement at Podrečje near Vir might also be attributed to an open rural settlement type. On the basis of the pottery assemblage and the radiocarbon dates the settlement can be dated to the 11th and 12th Centuries (or possibly even to the transition from the 10th to the 11th Century).
The material from Podrečje revealed novelties or changes in the development of the potter’s knowledge. The first noticeable change was in the composition of certain pottery fabrics. Pottery made of very fine (120 vessels) and finely-grained (53 vessels) fabrics were still prevalent. However, a very finely-grained fabric frequently with individual quartz grains of small (28 vessels) or even very coarse texture (11 vessels) was also used for pottery production. Vessels made from such fabrics had a coarse appearance. This phenomenon is also known on other sites in Slovenia, Hungary, Podravina in Croatia and in Bavaria. The greatest changes were conditioned by the gradual introduction of an ever-faster potter’s wheel. The prevailing technique was the one of shaping with additional reworking on a potter’s wheel (determined on 131 vessels out of 201 in total). The perfect rotation of the vessel (from the bottom up) on a slow wheel was seen on 35 vessels. The technique of shaping on the fast pedal-operated potter’s wheel (from a lump of clay) has been recognised on 17 vessels. On eighteen vessels the shaping technique remains undetermined. The differences that occurred during the shaping of the vessels can be chronologically determined. Vessels made on the slow potter’s wheel are typical of the 9th and 10th Centuries and persisted into the 11th Century, but no longer appear at the transition from the 11th to the 12th Century. To a smaller extent, shaping on the fast potter’s wheel appeared around the middle of the 10th Century. It became more common in the 11th century, but began to expand in the transition from the 11th to the 12th Century. The incomplete oxidisation firing method was recognised on over half of the vessels (125 vessels). A significant proportion of the vessels were subject to firing in a reducing atmosphere (41 vessels). The decoration on the vessels was very diverse. The techniques used are varied and involve a wide selection of motifs. The most prevalent decoration is that of vertical, diagonal or horizontal combed decoration of the entire surface, which mostly formed the background on which single horizontal or wavy lines were grooved (or more rarely incised). Single horizontal and wavy lines were most frequently arranged in a row on the vessel body. The appliéd cordons with or without fingertip impressions appeared most often on bowls or dishes, but more rarely on the widest circumference of pots. The cordon was usually applied to the combed foundation. There is grooving or fluting on some vessels, either as decoration or part of the shaping of the vessel body. This is a phenomenon, which is also found on in the Drava valley in Croatia.
High medieval vessel types include pots, bowls or dishes, and pitchers. The most common type is that of the small globular pot with an internal neck diameter of between 7.40 and 12.20 cm (18 vessels). They were followed by middle-sized pots with a diameter of between 13.40 and 17.0 cm, which formed an almost identical proportion (17 vessels). There was a significantly smaller number of large pots (8 vessels) between 17.80 and 22.80 cm in diameter, whilst there was only one example in the category of very large pots (neck diameter 34 cm). The lack of large pots could be explained by a culinary culture, which made much less use of large pots after the introduction of open hearths. The spatial analysis of the distribution of pots around (most probably) an open type of hearth (Context no. 411) in House 10 revealed an interesting vessel distribution: three small pots (G46, G49, G69), four medium-sized pots (G44, G51, G67, and G81), whilst the smallest share of proportion of vessels was from the category of large pots – only two such vessels being present (G60 and G82). In terms of function, small pots would be used for warming food and cooking smaller meals, medium pots were largely used for the preparation of meals (for the family), while large pots were intended for the storage of various food types. The presence and absence of the rim specifically designed to fit the lid was also connected with cooking, since its presence (the groove inside the vessel) permitted the preparation of braised food. The analysis of appearance of pot lids showed the presence of the groove on rim edges (after Losert) of shapes 1f, 1H, 2f, 4d, 6b, 7b, and 9b (dated to the period between the 10th and the 12th Centuries). Important information for the pottery chronology of the High Medieval Period was offered by the shapes of pot rims (Štular 2007, 126, Fig. 6.1: Graphical presentation of the dating of form types (schematically shown rims); in Upper Franconia − Losert 1993). Variants 1d and 1H, 2d, 1f, 2f and 2H and 4b are the so-called earlier variants, which were especially common prior to 1000 (but also appear after this year, although rarely). The later rim variants 2c, 7a, 4c, 4d, 1f were, characteristic of the period from AD 900 to about AD 1200. Variants 7b and 7c were typical I of the period between AD 1000 and AD 1100. The latest rim group includes variants 6g, 9b, 5d, 5e, 5f, 5g, and 9b, the appearance of which was characteristic for the time from 1000 onwards,. These are largely undercut rim forms. The appearance of pitchers (G113, G114) in the 10th and 11th Centuries is also chronologically significant, because, since they are limited to this period. All five variants of bowls or dishes from Podrečje could, according to Losert’s classification, be assigned to conical bowl forms with a slightly outward convex walls (his first group), where forms with 1a rims were more frequent in the Early Middle Ages, and forms 4c and 10d in the High Middle Ages (Losert 1993, Fig. 7: 1a−f). An examination of the spatial distribution of bowls showed that they were largely concentrated around hearth Context no. 411 (either inside House 10, or in a 10m zone around House 10).
Eight dwelling structures in sector I (Houses 1−8) were classified into the prehistoric settlement phase (Ist settlement phase). They formed two groups, which were separated by two ditches (Ditches 1 and 2). These were most probably drainage ditches, which were associated with Houses 6 and 8. Houses 6, 7, and 5, north of the above mentioned ditches, were bounded on the west by an enclosure fence. No fence was discovered to the south of the group of dwelling structures to the south of the two ditches. The buildings stood a few metres from each other and were built of with upright load-bearing posts. They most probably had compacted clay (cob) walls (elements of which were not preserved). The dimensions of these structures varied between 7 and 14 m in length and between 5 and 7m in width. House 2 stood out in terms of floor plan and dimensions. The surviving features suggest that the settlement extended to the west and east. The remains of the prehistoric settlement are dated to the period from the late Middle Bronze Age to the end of the Late Bronze Age in sector I. However the material from sector II suggests that the foundation of the settlement may be dated to as early as early mid Bonze Age. However, we need to emphasize that this date is based on an extremely modest assemblage of sherds representing 25 vessels (assemblage G1−25).
Taking into account the fact that remains of High Medieval pottery appeared only sporadically in sector I and based on the substantial High Medieval occupation layer (Context no. 4) and remains of three partially extant dwelling structures in sector II, there is incontrovertible evidence for the existence of a settlement or hamlet in the central part of sector II (settlement phase II). The best preserved dwelling structure was House 10, which had the remains of a hearth (probably of the open type) in the south-western part of the structure. The remains of other two dwelling structures were also recorded. House 9 was located in the extreme eastern part of the excavated area, whilst House 11, was represented by a mere three postholes, which were recorded in Section 1. These dwelling structures and a dense concentration of pottery in the area 10 m to the east of House 11 are proof that the settlement extended to the west and to the east of the excavated area. Štular states, that the period from the 8th to the 12th Century was a phase of fortified central settlements and undefended rural settlements from the perspective of settlement archaeology. These structures might represent log cabin type structures with an area of between 16 to 25m2, which would have been adapted to the micro location and environment (Štular 2001, 71, 72). The settlement at Podrečje near Vir might also be attributed to an open rural settlement type. On the basis of the pottery assemblage and the radiocarbon dates the settlement can be dated to the 11th and 12th Centuries (or possibly even to the transition from the 10th to the 11th Century).
The material from Podrečje revealed novelties or changes in the development of the potter’s knowledge. The first noticeable change was in the composition of certain pottery fabrics. Pottery made of very fine (120 vessels) and finely-grained (53 vessels) fabrics were still prevalent. However, a very finely-grained fabric frequently with individual quartz grains of small (28 vessels) or even very coarse texture (11 vessels) was also used for pottery production. Vessels made from such fabrics had a coarse appearance. This phenomenon is also known on other sites in Slovenia, Hungary, Podravina in Croatia and in Bavaria. The greatest changes were conditioned by the gradual introduction of an ever-faster potter’s wheel. The prevailing technique was the one of shaping with additional reworking on a potter’s wheel (determined on 131 vessels out of 201 in total). The perfect rotation of the vessel (from the bottom up) on a slow wheel was seen on 35 vessels. The technique of shaping on the fast pedal-operated potter’s wheel (from a lump of clay) has been recognised on 17 vessels. On eighteen vessels the shaping technique remains undetermined. The differences that occurred during the shaping of the vessels can be chronologically determined. Vessels made on the slow potter’s wheel are typical of the 9th and 10th Centuries and persisted into the 11th Century, but no longer appear at the transition from the 11th to the 12th Century. To a smaller extent, shaping on the fast potter’s wheel appeared around the middle of the 10th Century. It became more common in the 11th century, but began to expand in the transition from the 11th to the 12th Century. The incomplete oxidisation firing method was recognised on over half of the vessels (125 vessels). A significant proportion of the vessels were subject to firing in a reducing atmosphere (41 vessels). The decoration on the vessels was very diverse. The techniques used are varied and involve a wide selection of motifs. The most prevalent decoration is that of vertical, diagonal or horizontal combed decoration of the entire surface, which mostly formed the background on which single horizontal or wavy lines were grooved (or more rarely incised). Single horizontal and wavy lines were most frequently arranged in a row on the vessel body. The appliéd cordons with or without fingertip impressions appeared most often on bowls or dishes, but more rarely on the widest circumference of pots. The cordon was usually applied to the combed foundation. There is grooving or fluting on some vessels, either as decoration or part of the shaping of the vessel body. This is a phenomenon, which is also found on in the Drava valley in Croatia.
High medieval vessel types include pots, bowls or dishes, and pitchers. The most common type is that of the small globular pot with an internal neck diameter of between 7.40 and 12.20 cm (18 vessels). They were followed by middle-sized pots with a diameter of between 13.40 and 17.0 cm, which formed an almost identical proportion (17 vessels). There was a significantly smaller number of large pots (8 vessels) between 17.80 and 22.80 cm in diameter, whilst there was only one example in the category of very large pots (neck diameter 34 cm). The lack of large pots could be explained by a culinary culture, which made much less use of large pots after the introduction of open hearths. The spatial analysis of the distribution of pots around (most probably) an open type of hearth (Context no. 411) in House 10 revealed an interesting vessel distribution: three small pots (G46, G49, G69), four medium-sized pots (G44, G51, G67, and G81), whilst the smallest share of proportion of vessels was from the category of large pots – only two such vessels being present (G60 and G82). In terms of function, small pots would be used for warming food and cooking smaller meals, medium pots were largely used for the preparation of meals (for the family), while large pots were intended for the storage of various food types. The presence and absence of the rim specifically designed to fit the lid was also connected with cooking, since its presence (the groove inside the vessel) permitted the preparation of braised food. The analysis of appearance of pot lids showed the presence of the groove on rim edges (after Losert) of shapes 1f, 1H, 2f, 4d, 6b, 7b, and 9b (dated to the period between the 10th and the 12th Centuries). Important information for the pottery chronology of the High Medieval Period was offered by the shapes of pot rims (Štular 2007, 126, Fig. 6.1: Graphical presentation of the dating of form types (schematically shown rims); in Upper Franconia − Losert 1993). Variants 1d and 1H, 2d, 1f, 2f and 2H and 4b are the so-called earlier variants, which were especially common prior to 1000 (but also appear after this year, although rarely). The later rim variants 2c, 7a, 4c, 4d, 1f were, characteristic of the period from AD 900 to about AD 1200. Variants 7b and 7c were typical I of the period between AD 1000 and AD 1100. The latest rim group includes variants 6g, 9b, 5d, 5e, 5f, 5g, and 9b, the appearance of which was characteristic for the time from 1000 onwards,. These are largely undercut rim forms. The appearance of pitchers (G113, G114) in the 10th and 11th Centuries is also chronologically significant, because, since they are limited to this period. All five variants of bowls or dishes from Podrečje could, according to Losert’s classification, be assigned to conical bowl forms with a slightly outward convex walls (his first group), where forms with 1a rims were more frequent in the Early Middle Ages, and forms 4c and 10d in the High Middle Ages (Losert 1993, Fig. 7: 1a−f). An examination of the spatial distribution of bowls showed that they were largely concentrated around hearth Context no. 411 (either inside House 10, or in a 10m zone around House 10).
Fragments of a pair of heavily gold-plated spurs made from a copper alloy were discovered during a metal detector survey on the grounds of a castle known today as Zítkov (cadastral territory of Choceň in the Pardubice Region). Even though... more
Fragments of a pair of heavily gold-plated spurs made from a copper alloy were discovered during a metal detector survey on the grounds of a castle known today as Zítkov (cadastral territory of Choceň in the Pardubice Region). Even though it is not clear how the spurs reached their findspot, these products are extraordinary evidence of work with non-ferrous metal in the 14th century or at the beginning of the 15th century. Their connection with the knightly milieu is evident from the craftsmanship of the artefacts and
the gold-plating of their surface.
the gold-plating of their surface.
Kamil SMÍŠEK-David VÍCH Abstrakt-Coins found single via the surface examination in Hedčany (Dašice cadastral community, Pardubice district). In 2008-2012, occasional metal detecting activities were organized near the Hedčany settlement.... more
Kamil SMÍŠEK-David VÍCH Abstrakt-Coins found single via the surface examination in Hedčany (Dašice cadastral community, Pardubice district). In 2008-2012, occasional metal detecting activities were organized near the Hedčany settlement. The coins found there can be characterized-without exception-as a sample of the contemporary coins of the lowest denominations in circulation. From the chronological point of view, the coins cover the interval from the end of the 14 th century to the time closely after the mid-18 th century. Bohemia, Late Medieval Period, Early Modern Period, lost coins Od roku 2008 byla prováděna příležitostná detektorová prospekce 1 na katastru osady Hedčany (k. ú. Da-šice)-průzkum byl organizován archeologickým pracovištěm Regionálního muzea ve Vysokém Mýtě. Lokalita se nachází při východním okraji osady Hedčany na mírném návrší nad inundací na pravém břehu řeky Loučné v nadmořské výšce okolo 230 m. n. m. Půdní pokryv je tvořen hlinitopísčitou půdou. V areálu lokality se kromě ojedinělé laténské keramiky podařilo získat především nálezy z doby řím-ské, mladší doby hradištní a vrcholného středověku. Nálezový materiál představují především keramické zlomky, zatímco kovové předměty se vyskytovaly spíše ojediněle. Významný podíl zjištěných kovových artefaktů tvoří numismatický materiál z období vrcholného středověku a raného novověku, jehož vyhod-nocení je předmětem tohoto příspěvku. Všechny zde prezentované mince jsou uloženy ve Východočes-kém muzeu v Pardubicích.
In 2013–2014 a collection of metal objects originating from various sites in Moravia and in the eastern half of Bohemia was handed over to the Regional museum in Vysoké Mýto. The only artefact which can be securely da - ted to prehistory... more
In 2013–2014 a collection of metal objects originating from various sites in Moravia and in the eastern half of Bohemia
was handed over to the Regional museum in Vysoké Mýto. The only artefact which can be securely da -
ted to prehistory is a club-shaped head of a bronze pin. The other objects date back to the Middle Ages and the
Modern Period. No certain information is available about the origin of this collection, but if we sum up the
available facts (exclusively metal objects, originating from fortified manors, castles, hillforts or their surroundings),
it is most probably a collection created with the help of a metal detector.
Some tools which are only rarely represented in museum collections (such as a scythe from Potštejn) may
be of more interest. The same is true for militaria – especially the finds of fragments of iron gun barrels and a
lead projectile from Velký Vřešťov are interesting. Although these objects were found in the immediate vicinity
of a prehistoric hillfort, it is beyond doubt that they are related to a siege camp established near the castle in
1467. In their majority, these are trivial objects which would only be of some indicative value if they were discovered
during a systematically led excavation including appropriate documentation.
was handed over to the Regional museum in Vysoké Mýto. The only artefact which can be securely da -
ted to prehistory is a club-shaped head of a bronze pin. The other objects date back to the Middle Ages and the
Modern Period. No certain information is available about the origin of this collection, but if we sum up the
available facts (exclusively metal objects, originating from fortified manors, castles, hillforts or their surroundings),
it is most probably a collection created with the help of a metal detector.
Some tools which are only rarely represented in museum collections (such as a scythe from Potštejn) may
be of more interest. The same is true for militaria – especially the finds of fragments of iron gun barrels and a
lead projectile from Velký Vřešťov are interesting. Although these objects were found in the immediate vicinity
of a prehistoric hillfort, it is beyond doubt that they are related to a siege camp established near the castle in
1467. In their majority, these are trivial objects which would only be of some indicative value if they were discovered
during a systematically led excavation including appropriate documentation.
In 2005–2016 a number of isolated metal finds of medieval and early modern date ended up in collections of various museums in eastern Bohemia and in the Bohemian-Moravian borderland. These especially include militaria, equestrian... more
In 2005–2016 a number of isolated metal finds of medieval and early modern date ended up in collections of various museums in eastern Bohemia and in the Bohemian-Moravian borderland. These especially include militaria, equestrian equipment, but other find categories are present as well. The objects have different evidential value, but in a number of cases, they represent valuable sources of knowledge about areas which are archaeologically still little known. Bohemian-Moravian borderland – Middle Ages – metal objects Úvod Od r. 2005 (po obsazení archeologického pracoviště v Regionálním muzeu ve Vysokém Mýtě) zde byla věnována značná pozornost problematice používání i zneužívání detekto-rů kovů. V této souvislosti tu byly přebírány náhodné nálezy učiněné s detektory kovů, později řadu nálezů poskytli spolupracovníci uvedené instituce, na řadě lokalit pak pro-váděl cílený detektorový průzkum archeolog Regionálního muzea ve Vysokém Mýtě za účasti spolupracovníků. Vedle kolekcí z nejrůznějších lokalit, které byly a jsou postupně předmětem prezentace v odborném tisku, docházelo rovněž k ojedinělým nálezům vrchol-ně středověkých artefaktů a artefaktů ze staršího novověku. I když jejich vypovídací hod-nota je značně nižší, protože nepochází z intaktních archeologických situací v rámci stan-dardních výzkumů či z větších nálezových kolekcí, které by usnadnily interpretaci, i tyto předměty si nepochybně zaslouží bližší pozornost. Jejich zveřejnění (mimo numismatické nálezy) je úkolem následujících řádků. 1 1 Příspěvek byl vypracován v rámci programu aplikovaného výzkumu a vývoje národní a kulturní identity (NAKI II) č. DG16P02R031 (Moravské křižovatky).
Metal detector survey of Zítkov Castle yielded about two hundred arrowheads, which attest that the castle has been besieged approximately at the turn between the 14th and 15th centuries. In about two thirds of all these projectiles it was... more
Metal detector survey of Zítkov Castle yielded about two hundred arrowheads, which attest that the castle has been besieged approximately at the turn between the 14th and 15th centuries. In about two thirds of all these projectiles it was also possible to document the position in which the one or another point was found; it mostly was perpendicular to the course of contour lines of the slope. The question remains whether this orientation follows the original shooting direction, or whether it is a result of post-depositional processes. The analysis of finds from Zítkov rather indicates the former possibility, but it will be necessary to verify it at other localities.
The paper presents small-scale rescue excavations in the Ústí nad Orlicí District in 2015, including
documentation. The represented periods include the High Middle Ages and the modern period, or
possibly also undated situations.
documentation. The represented periods include the High Middle Ages and the modern period, or
possibly also undated situations.
Early and high medieval inland watercraft were able to moor even on flat riverbanks without any constructions. The question of a harbour and the relevance of a river for a settlement is therefore also the question of river courses and... more
Early and high medieval inland watercraft were able to moor even on flat riverbanks without any constructions. The question of a harbour and the relevance of a river for a settlement is therefore also the question of river courses and banks in a particular period. To answer these questions, an interdisciplinary (geo)archaeological and geophysical point of view was applied within two case studies.
In Karlburg, the settlement is located on a flood-safe, Holocene floodplain-terrace of the Main – a potential flood would have to rise at least 1.5 m to threaten the settlement. A »buffer zone« next to the Main was apparently populated less intensively and marks the medieval shoreline area 40-100 m west of today’s river course. Boats could land at or even on the remaining naturally formed bank area. In the central area of Karlburg more complex constructions such as a quay may have supported Karlburg’s function as an Ufermarkt especially in the Carolingian period.
In the deserted settlement Mühlstatt, part of the royal palace complex Salz on the Franconian Saale, people lived on an elevated, flood-safe but riverine position on a calcite-cemented gravel layer / alluvial fan. Geological characteristics formed an anastomosing river with a largely constant river course over centuries. A simple, naturally formed landing
site with a gently sloping embankment about 1.5-2 m under today’s surface could be reconstructed there.
In Karlburg, the settlement is located on a flood-safe, Holocene floodplain-terrace of the Main – a potential flood would have to rise at least 1.5 m to threaten the settlement. A »buffer zone« next to the Main was apparently populated less intensively and marks the medieval shoreline area 40-100 m west of today’s river course. Boats could land at or even on the remaining naturally formed bank area. In the central area of Karlburg more complex constructions such as a quay may have supported Karlburg’s function as an Ufermarkt especially in the Carolingian period.
In the deserted settlement Mühlstatt, part of the royal palace complex Salz on the Franconian Saale, people lived on an elevated, flood-safe but riverine position on a calcite-cemented gravel layer / alluvial fan. Geological characteristics formed an anastomosing river with a largely constant river course over centuries. A simple, naturally formed landing
site with a gently sloping embankment about 1.5-2 m under today’s surface could be reconstructed there.
U sklopu realizacije programa „Arheološki park Turčišće – Goričan“ 2014. godine provedena su arheološka i povijesno-arhivska istraživanja srednjovjekovnog gradišta/mote na položaju Gradišće u Turčišću, Općina Domašinec. Gradišće čini... more
U sklopu realizacije programa „Arheološki park Turčišće – Goričan“ 2014.
godine provedena su arheološka i povijesno-arhivska istraživanja srednjovjekovnog
gradišta/mote na položaju Gradišće u Turčišću, Općina Domašinec. Gradišće čini
središnji plato zaštićen dvama opkopima te zemljanim nasipom. Arheološka istraživanja
pokazala su da je život na Gradišću trajao od sredine 12. do sredine 13. stoljeća,
kad je stradalo u požaru, dok su provedena povijesno-arhivska istraživanja omogućila
njegovo povezivanje s plemićkom obitelji Domaša, čije je ime ostalo sačuvano u nazivu
današnjeg naselja Domašinca. Arheološkim istraživanjima ustanovljeni elementi
konstrukcije srednjovjekovne građevine na središnjem platou Gradišća upućuju na
prijelazni oblik između gradnje s ukopanim stupovima i kanatne gradnje. S druge
strane, to je stariji tip gradnje s početka razvoja tradicionalne međimurske arhitekture,
kanatno građenih „šopanih hiža“.
godine provedena su arheološka i povijesno-arhivska istraživanja srednjovjekovnog
gradišta/mote na položaju Gradišće u Turčišću, Općina Domašinec. Gradišće čini
središnji plato zaštićen dvama opkopima te zemljanim nasipom. Arheološka istraživanja
pokazala su da je život na Gradišću trajao od sredine 12. do sredine 13. stoljeća,
kad je stradalo u požaru, dok su provedena povijesno-arhivska istraživanja omogućila
njegovo povezivanje s plemićkom obitelji Domaša, čije je ime ostalo sačuvano u nazivu
današnjeg naselja Domašinca. Arheološkim istraživanjima ustanovljeni elementi
konstrukcije srednjovjekovne građevine na središnjem platou Gradišća upućuju na
prijelazni oblik između gradnje s ukopanim stupovima i kanatne gradnje. S druge
strane, to je stariji tip gradnje s početka razvoja tradicionalne međimurske arhitekture,
kanatno građenih „šopanih hiža“.
La historia de las gentes que poblaron las tierras entre el río Duero y el Sistema Central durante los siglos VIII-XI es una gran desconocida. Tras la caída del Reino Visigodo y la efímera dominación de al-Ándalus este territorio quedó... more
La historia de las gentes que poblaron las tierras entre el río Duero y el Sistema Central durante los siglos VIII-XI es una gran desconocida. Tras la caída del Reino Visigodo y la efímera dominación de al-Ándalus este territorio quedó abandonado de una autoridad superior, pero sus habitantes permanecieron en sus aldeas, castros, castillos y ciudades y conformaron su propio sistema de organización social y política. Estas comunidades autónomas de bienes comunales, con el paso de los años, desarrollaron una jerarquización interna basada en el poder militar y económico. Sus élites fueron asimiladas en el feudalismo importado del norte cuando León y Castilla, que a la par de traer nuevos moradores, reorganizaron administrativamente estas tierras y sus gentes en procesos de repoblación.
Asimismo, con esta obra se pretende superar definitivamente los planteamientos historiográficos del siglo pasado y demostrar la amplia presencia poblacional en la mitad sur del valle del Duero y los valles portugueses del Vouga y Mondego. Así, se señalan los más de 1600 asentamientos existentes durante este periodo en un amplio catálogo acompañado de mapas y comentarios de las evidencias documentales, arqueológicas, epigráficas y toponímicas; unos asentamientos que vienen a “dejar patente que, a pesar de tratarse de una tierra de nadie, fue una tierra con gente”.
Asimismo, con esta obra se pretende superar definitivamente los planteamientos historiográficos del siglo pasado y demostrar la amplia presencia poblacional en la mitad sur del valle del Duero y los valles portugueses del Vouga y Mondego. Así, se señalan los más de 1600 asentamientos existentes durante este periodo en un amplio catálogo acompañado de mapas y comentarios de las evidencias documentales, arqueológicas, epigráficas y toponímicas; unos asentamientos que vienen a “dejar patente que, a pesar de tratarse de una tierra de nadie, fue una tierra con gente”.
Wie wichtig die Binnenschifffahrt im Mittelalter war, verdeutlichen die immensen Anstrengungen Karls des Großen, das Mammutprojekt eines Kanals zwischen Mein und Donau zu verwirklichen. Doch neben der "Fossa Carolina" gab es viele weitere... more
Wie wichtig die Binnenschifffahrt im Mittelalter war, verdeutlichen die immensen Anstrengungen Karls des Großen, das Mammutprojekt eines Kanals zwischen Mein und Donau zu verwirklichen. Doch neben der "Fossa Carolina" gab es viele weitere Anlagen, die ein dichtes Transportnetz bildeten und den Warenaustausch sicherstellten. Die meist nicht befestigten Häfen zu lokalisieren ist eine Herausforderung, der sich die Wissenschaftler des Schwerpunktsporgramms 1630 der DFG stellen.
Uherské Hradiště is one of the few towns in which there are most preserved artefacts in the objects from high Middle Ages made of organic materials due to high level of groundwater and constantly wet conditions of clay subbase. Thus the... more
Uherské Hradiště is one of the few towns in which there are most preserved artefacts in the objects from high Middle Ages made of organic materials due to high level of groundwater and constantly wet conditions of clay subbase. Thus the finds of leather artefacts are no exception and they were discovered during almost all larger researches within the historical core of the town. The aim of this contribution is to present the results of technological and typological as well as material analysis from the locality Zelný trh (Green Market) and thus enlarge present-day knowledge about Medieval Ages clothes, footwear and other objects of personal possession. The collection of leather artefacts discovered during an archaeological research in Zelný trh represents quite an interesting and, in some aspects also not very common, inventory of leather made products from the period of high Middle Ages dated to the second half of 13th century till the beginning of 15th century. Not very typical is a low percentage of finds of footwear or its particular components. The situation is even more surprising if we consider the site of the finds. It is the backs side of the plot neighbouring with a raceway the banks of which were continually reinforced with fluvial and anthropogenic layers of manure-like character. According to the level of wear and tear as well as to their overall fragmentation the finds cannot be considered as waste objects. The whole collection can be defined as the so called secondary or tertiary waste. That is the reason why the relatively low percentage (approximately 8% of all object found and 47% from the group of identifiable objects outside production waste) of footwear among the finds is so surprising, because it was footwear that in the high Middle Ages belonged to consumption goods with a high level of depreciation and thus it commonly dominates similar collections. On the other hand, it is obvious that the researched locality was not primarily meant to be a goal-directed and regular dump of this kind of waste because the collection despite its long time span is not very numerous.
From typological and morphological points of view it is necessary to mention several finds. The fragment of decorative belt is, for the time being, without direct analogies from home environment mainly due to preserved colouring in its gaps. The extent of original colouring remains questionable, i.e. the possibility that the whole product was painted red, which seems to be the most probable option. The range of present-day knowledge also does not make it possible for us to say whether such a colouring was common or whether we have to do with a luxurious product. In the Medieval Ages, the bet had not only a utility function but also fashion and decorative ones. Its style might have been plainly common but also very sumptuous. Such a product was considered more a jewel a sign of social status of a person ad their affiliation to a social group. The last very important find is that of narrow cases (sleeves) which were most probably used for styluses used for writing upon wax tables. The remaining majority of artefacts represent a common inventory typical exactly for this kind of collections.
The results of type purposes of the materials used may also be considered standard. Out of 19 artefacts researched 9 of them were identified as cowhide or calfskin which is also most probable with the remaining 8 ones. One artefact was made of goatskin. It was impossible to identify the material for just two artefacts. Material analysis may also be helpful from the point of view of the purpose of the objects researched. One of the indications might be the fact that calfskin was used mainly in production of artefacts which are considered to be remains of sheaths.
From typological and morphological points of view it is necessary to mention several finds. The fragment of decorative belt is, for the time being, without direct analogies from home environment mainly due to preserved colouring in its gaps. The extent of original colouring remains questionable, i.e. the possibility that the whole product was painted red, which seems to be the most probable option. The range of present-day knowledge also does not make it possible for us to say whether such a colouring was common or whether we have to do with a luxurious product. In the Medieval Ages, the bet had not only a utility function but also fashion and decorative ones. Its style might have been plainly common but also very sumptuous. Such a product was considered more a jewel a sign of social status of a person ad their affiliation to a social group. The last very important find is that of narrow cases (sleeves) which were most probably used for styluses used for writing upon wax tables. The remaining majority of artefacts represent a common inventory typical exactly for this kind of collections.
The results of type purposes of the materials used may also be considered standard. Out of 19 artefacts researched 9 of them were identified as cowhide or calfskin which is also most probable with the remaining 8 ones. One artefact was made of goatskin. It was impossible to identify the material for just two artefacts. Material analysis may also be helpful from the point of view of the purpose of the objects researched. One of the indications might be the fact that calfskin was used mainly in production of artefacts which are considered to be remains of sheaths.
The High Middle Ages settlement in Kapitulská street, site court of Eszterházy palace in Bratislava. This article is aimed on the processing of a part of archaeological research in 2004 in the court of the Eszterházy palace in Kapitulská... more
The High Middle Ages settlement in Kapitulská street, site court of Eszterházy palace in Bratislava. This article is aimed on the processing of a part of archaeological research in 2004 in the court of the Eszterházy palace in Kapitulská street, no. 6–8 in Bra-tislava. There are settlement features – 2_SI/2004, 4_SI/2004, 6_SI/2004 from trench SI/2004 and feature 1_SII/2004 from sonde SII/2004, in which were found archaeological material dated to an earlier phase of the High Middle Ages (12th – beginning of 13th century). In the feature 4_SI/2004 and 6_SI/2004 were also found younger artefacts from the 14th century, respectively in the feature 1_SII/2004 and 6_SI/2004 were as intrusion, findings from the Late La Tène period.
Related Topics
71.3 million researchers use this site every month. Ads help cover our server costs.