Fifth- and fourth-millennium copper tools from south-east Europe from French findspots In France, in recent years, there have been several finds of metal objects that pre-date the oldest known evidence for metalworking there. These...
moreFifth- and fourth-millennium copper tools from south-east Europe from French findspots
In France, in recent years, there have been several finds of metal objects that pre-date the oldest known evidence for metalworking there. These objects are associated with the Cortaillod and Pfyn cultures and are made from ‘Mondsee copper’, demonstrating that they had been imported over several hundred kilometres. In addition, two axe-/adze-heads of Jászladány type, dating to the beginning of the fourth millennium BC, plus an axe-hammer head of Čoka type, have been identified among old collections. Two of these objects have been subjected to a detailed typo-chronological study and elemental and isotopic analyses.
While the findspot of the axe-/adze-head of Jászladány type found at Meaux (Seine-et-Marne) is not in doubt, that of Bû (Eure-et-Loir) has been identified more recently. As for the massive axehead of Čoka type, its findspot is not secure.
These three objects, which belong to the ‘Schwergeräte’ category, originated in south-east Europe. The axe-/adze-heads of Jászladány type belong to the Bodrogkeresztúr culture, centred on the eastern part of Hungary and dated to the beginning of the fourth millennium; as for the Čoka-type axe-hammer head, this probably belongs to the Tiszapolgar culture or to its transition to the Bodrogkeresztúr culture at the end of the fifth millennium.
It was possible to undertake elemental and isotopic analyses on the axe-hammer head from Meaux and on the Čoka-type specimen. While minor differences in composition were detected, both had been made from a very pure copper. The elemental and isotopic results for the Meaux object point clearly towards the mine of Majdanpek in Serbia, even though it had not necessarily been manufactured in that locality; it is known that copper from this mine had been exported to neighbouring areas (Romania and Hungary). By contrast, the results obtained from the Čoka-type axe-hammer head do not allow us to pinpoint the origin of the copper. However, Romania appears to be the most likely region.
The findspots of the two axe-hammer heads found at Meaux and Bû, and probably that of the unprovenanced example, are considerably to the west of their region of origin in the Carpathian Basin. Several routes are possible. The first, and least likely, is across central Europe; the second would have been along the northern margins of the Alps; the last, and most plausible, is via northern Italy and the south of France.
The two artefacts whose provenance is secure (Meaux and Bû) are currently the oldest metal objects known from France; but they are probably not the only objects to have reached France from south-east Europe at the end of the fifth and beginning of the fourth millennium BC. Other objects, such as perhaps the idol and the beads from Pauilhac (Gers), or the agrafes from Erdeven/Saint-Germain (Morbihan) could well be imports from south-east Europe at the end of the fifth millenniun BC. As for the gold disc-ring found at Guern an Floc’h/Maël-Pestivien (Côtes-d’Armor), this could be a local copy of the disc-rings of Alpine jade, made using imported gold. We should also mention here the idol made of haematite found at Plovan/Renongar (Finistère), which is most likely to be an imitation of a gold object from Bulgaria, made during the second half of the fifth millennium. But unfortunately, in all these cases, there are uncertainties about their dating and/or their precise findspot.
Thus, in France, metal objects originating in south-east Europe and dating to the transition between the fifth and fourth millennia may be less rare than had been suspected previously, even though these long-distance imports do not weaken the argument for a division of Europe at this period between an eastern ‘Europe of copper’ and a western ‘Europe of jade’.